Skip to main content
Log in

Eighteen-year outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate patient reported outcomes and radiographic arthritic changes of transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstrings (HS) auto-grafts at a minimum of 15-year follow-up.

Methods

Ninety-four patients (51 of the HS group, 43 of BPTB group) who were operated between the years 2000 to 2005 in two tertiary referral hospitals were contacted and invited to a retrospective evaluation. The interview included subjective outcomes using the Lysholm knee scoring questionnaire, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Tegner activity level scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and patients’ satisfaction scale. Knee examination included measurements of motion and stability. Knee radiographs were evaluated for osteoarthritic changes according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score.

Results

The average evaluation time from surgery was 18.6 years. Subjectively, there was no significant difference between groups except for a better post-operative level of activity and satisfaction in the HS group. Objectively, there was no significant difference between groups in knee stability and range of motion. Most patients had grade KL ≤ 1 radiographic osteoarthritits changes and there was no significant difference between groups. Recurrent complete tear of the reconstructed graft occurred in 3 patients of each group. In both groups 84% had no further surgery while the indications for further surgery were mostly a meniscal tear or tibial hardware removal.

Conclusions

Very long-term outcomes and clinical stability of transtibial HS or BPTB graft ACL reconstruction are good with low rate of graft failure and radiographic osteoarthritis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This manuscript has associated data in a data repository available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Delincé P, Ghafil D (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:48–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1614-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murawski CD, van Eck CF, Irrgang JJ, Tashman S, Fu FH (2014) Operative treatment of primary anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:685–694. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Piedade SR, Leite Arruda BP, Antunes de Vasconcelos R, Parker DA, Maffulli N (2022) Rehabilitation and advances in Surgical Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: what has changed since the 1960s? - state of the art. J ISAKOS 18:S2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2022.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM (2007) The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 35:1756–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507307396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lohmander LSO, stenberg A, Englund M, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum 50:3145–3152. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnussen RA, Carey JL, Spindler KP (2011) Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:462–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1277-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meuffels DE, FavejeeMM, Vissers MM, Heijboer MP, Reijman M, Verhaar JAN (2009) Ten year follow-up study comparing conservative versus operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures: a matched-pair analysis of high level athletes. Br J Sports Med 43:347–351. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.049403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sollberger VD, Korthaus A, Barg A, Pagenstert G (2023) Long-term results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft with a minimum follow-up of 10 years-a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:4277–4289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04687-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Keays AC (2023) The development of long-term osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament injury: reconstruction vs no reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:3201–3211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04662-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa-Paz M, Garcia-Mansilla I, Marciano S, Ayerza MA, Muscolo DL (2019) Knee-related quality of life, functional results and osteoarthritis at a minimum of 20 years’ follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 26:666–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Curado J, Hulet C, Hardy P, Jenny JY, Rousseau R, Lucet A, Steltzlen C et al (2020) Very long-term osteoarthritis rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 182 cases with 22-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106:459–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng C, Lei G, Gao S, Luo W (2018) Methods and devices for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 292018(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858

  13. Everhart JS, Yalcin S, Spindler KP (2022) Twenty-year outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a systematic review of prospectively Collected Data. Am J Sports Med 50:2842–2852. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211027302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grassi A, Pizza N, Al-Zu’bi BBH, Fabbro GD, Lucidi GA, Zaffagnini S (2022) Clinical outcomes and osteoarthritis at very long-term follow-up after ACL Reconstruction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 10:23259671211062238. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211062238

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagemans FJA, Jonkers FJ, van Dam MJJ, von Gerhardt AL, van der List JP (2020) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon graft and femoral cortical button fixation at Minimum 20-Year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 48:2962–2969. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520951796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salmon LJ, Heath E, Akrawi H, Roe JP, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2018) 20-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 46:531–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517741497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shelbourne KD, Benner RW, Gray T (2017) Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autografts: objective factors associated with the development of osteoarthritis at 20 to 33 years after surgery. Am J Sports Med 45:2730–2738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517718827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sporsheim AN, Gifstad T, Lundemo TO, Engebretsen L, Strand T, Mølster A et al (2019) Autologous BPTB ACL reconstruction results in lower failure rates than ACL repair with and without synthetic augmentation at 30 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:2074–2081. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoge CG, Matar RN, Khalil LS, Buchan JA, Johnson CM, Grawe BM (2022) Outcomes following anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon vs Hamstring autografts: a systematic review of Randomized controlled trials with a Mean follow-up of 15 years. Arch Bone Jt Surg 10:311–319. https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2021.53662.2668

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Holm I, Oiestad BE, Risberg MA, Aune AK (2010) No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38:448–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509350301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hartnett N, Leigh WB, Richmond AK (2016) Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a 15-Year follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med 44:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515611886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson SM, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Linklater J, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA (2016) Twenty-year outcome of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon or Hamstring Autograft. Am J Sports Med 44:3083–3094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516658041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lebel B, Hulet C, Galaud B, Burdin G, Locker B, Vielpeau C (2008) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone patellar tendon bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 36:1275–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508314721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis PB, Parameswaran AD, Rue JPH, Bach BR (2008) Systematic review of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a baseline assessment for consideration of double-bundle techniques. Am J Sports Med 36:2028–2036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508322892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9CD005960. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005960

  26. Bjornsson H, Samuelsson K, Sundemo D, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2016) A Randomized Controlled Trial with Mean 16-Year follow-up comparing hamstring and patellar Tendon autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:2304–2313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516646378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sajovic M, Stropnik D, Skaza K (2018) Long-term comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a 17-Year follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med 46:1800–1808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518768768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kessler MA, Behrend H, Henz S, Stutz G, Rukavina A, Kuster MS (2008) Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0498-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McDaniel WJ Jr, Dameron TB Jr (1980) Untreated ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:696–705 doi N/A

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506296042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR et al (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient: a prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659402200511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Keays SL, Newcombe PA, Bullock-Saxton JE, Bullock MI, Keays AC (2010) Factors involved in the development of osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 38:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509350914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li RT, Lorenz S, Xu Y, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ (2011) Predictors of radiographic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:2595–2603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511424720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen T, Zhang P, Chen J, Hua Y, Chen S (2017) Long-term outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using either synthetics with Remnant Preservation or Hamstring autografts: a 10-Year longitudinal study. Am J Sports Med 45:2739–2750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517721692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fairbank TJ (1948) Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 30:664–670 doi N/A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu WH, Hackett T, Richmond JC (2002) Effects of meniscal and articular surface status on knee stability, function, and symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term prospective study. Am J Sports Med 30:845–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465020300061501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Raggi F, Signorelli C et al (2017) Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus extra-articular lateral tenodesis with hamstring tendon grafts: prospective evaluation with 20-Year Minimum follow-up. Am J Sports Med 45:3233–3242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517723013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors: conceptualization, data curation, writing – review and editing, project administration. Lee Yaari, Jonathan Singer, Dan Goldberg: methodology, formal analysis, investigation. Barak Haviv, Yiftah Beer: writing-original draft, supervision.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by an institutional review board of Rabin Medical Center, Israel: number 0277-20-RMC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barak Haviv.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaari, L., Singer, J., Goldberg, D. et al. Eighteen-year outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05317-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05317-2

Keywords

Navigation