Skip to main content
Log in

Market resilience of orthopaedic hip/knee arthroplasty sales during COVID-19

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a marked decrease in elective surgical volume and orthopaedic device sales. The aim of this paper was to quantify this decrease and the related financial impact on the largest hip/knee arthroplasty companies by: (1) tracking individual hip/knee company valuations; (2) calculating aggregate changes in overall hip/knee arthroplasty market valuations; and (3) quantifying quarterly hip/knee revenues relative to prior years.

Materials and methods

Financial data on the top five hip/knee arthroplasty companies by size between January 1, 2019, and October 1, 2020, was collected from a Wall Street financial database, S&P Capital IQ. Changes in valuation of these companies were compared against benchmark market indices, the S&P500 and Vanguard Healthcare ETF. U.S. hip/knee arthroplasty-specific revenue for Q1 and Q2 of 2019 and 2020 was collected from Securities Exchange Commission 10-Q forms. Quarterly revenue changes were calculated using 1-2Q19 revenues as baselines and aggregate to approximate the overall hip/knee arthroplasty market.

Results

The top five hip/knee companies lost $179.2 billion (32.7% loss) in market value from pre COVID-19 market highs to COVID-19 market lows (March 2020), while S&P500 and Vanguard Healthcare ETF decreased 36.1 and 33.2%, respectively. From market lows to October 2020, arthroplasty companies rallied 38.6% while the S&P500 and Vanguard Healthcare ETF regained 43.5 and 56.4% respectively. Notably, this occurred while aggregate 1Q/2Q20 revenue lagged 7.1/41.8% relative to 2019, with an overall decrease of $1.58B (24.8%).

Conclusions

Similar to the overall market and healthcare sector, the top five hip/knee arthroplasty companies have recovered from their COVID market lows. Our results reveal that the valuations of hip/knee companies remained robust during COVID, even as revenues fell, likely due to strong investor confidence in the industry outlook and the greater overall healthcare system utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verma P, Dumka A, Bhardwaj A et al (2021) A statistical analysis of impact of COVID19 on the Global Economy and Stock Index returns. SN Comput Sci 2021(21):2–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42979-020-00410-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burlacu A, Crisan-Dabija R, Covic A et al (2020) Pandemic lockdown, healthcare policies and human rights: integrating opposed views on COVID-19 public health mitigation measures. Rev Cardiovasc Med 21:509–516. https://doi.org/10.31083/J.RCM.2020.04.274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (2023) WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard With Vaccination Data. World Health Organization. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 15 June 2021

  4. Jackson JK, Nelson RM, Sutter KM, Sutherland MD (2021) Global Economic effects of COVID-19. Congr Res Serv

  5. Kaye AD, Okeagu CN, Pham AD et al (2020) Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: international perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

  6. Anoushiravani AA, O’Connor CM, DiCaprio MR, Iorio R (2020) Economic impacts of the COVID-19 Crisis: an Orthopaedic Perspective. J Bone Jt Surg Am 102:937–941. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collaborative CO (2020) Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. Br J Surg 107:1440–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anand R, Graves SE, de Steiger RN et al (2011) What is the benefit of introducing new hip and knee prostheses? J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 3):51–54. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00867

  9. Maresova P, Klimova B, Honegr J et al (2020) Medical device development process, and Associated Risks and Legislative aspects-systematic review. Front Public Heal 8:308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:624–630. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips CH (2012) S&P Capital IQ. J Bus Financ Librariansh 17:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S&P Global Market Intelligence (2020) S&P Capital IQ Platform. S&P Global Market Intelligence. https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/solutions/sp-capital-iq-platform. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  13. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commision. EDGAR | Company Filings. SECGOV. https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  14. Wang J-J, Liang Y, Su J-T, Zhu J-M (2021) An analysis of the Economic Impact of US Presidential elections based on principal component and logical regression. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5593967. Complexity 2021:5593967

  15. JP Morgan (2020) How Are Markets Reacting to the U.S. Election? JP Morgan. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/research/market-reaction-2020-election. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  16. Cevik E, Kirci Altinkeski B, Cevik EI et al (2022) Investor sentiments and stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic. Financ Innov 8:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00375-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ben-Joseph O, Busby TF, Holmes D (2023) Orthopedic Industry Outlook Prompts Positive Market Sentiment. MedTech Strategist. https://www.outcomecapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Outcome-Capital-MTS-1-2023-LK.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2023

  18. Smith + Nephew (2020) Smith + Nephew Second Quarter and First Half 2020 Results. Smith + Nephew. https://www.smith-nephew.com/en/news/2020/07/29/20200729-sn-second-quarter-and-first-half-2020-results. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  19. Barnes CL, Zhang X, Stronach BM, Haas DA (2021) The initial impact of COVID-19 on total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 36:S56–S61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bedard NA, Elkins JM, Brown TS (2020) Effect of COVID-19 on hip and knee Arthroplasty Surgical volume in the United States. J Arthroplast 35:S45–S48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen AZ, Shen TS, Bovonratwet P et al (2021) Total joint arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review with implications for future practice. Arthroplast Today 8:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.12.028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Connor CM, Anoushiravani AA, DiCaprio MR et al (2020) Economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic: resuming Elective Orthopedic surgery and total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 35:S32–S36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kremers HM, Larson DR, Crowson CS et al (2014) Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg - Am Vol 97:1386–1397. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 89:780–785. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marsh M, Newman S (2021) Trends and developments in hip and knee arthroplasty technology. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 8:2055668320952043. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668320952043

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacofsky DJ, Allen M (2016) Robotics in Arthroplasty: a Comprehensive Review. J Arthroplast 31:2353–2363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Henderson RH, French D, Stewart E et al (2023) Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach. J Pharm Policy Pract 16(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00590-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wouters OJ, McKee M, Luyten J (2020) Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009–2018. JAMA 323(9):844–853. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dyrda L (2018) Top 10 orthopedic companies by market share — and where they’ll be in 2022. Becker’s Spine Review. https://www.beckersspine.com/spinal-tech/40549-top-10-orthopedic-companies-by-market-share-and-where-they-ll-be-in-2022.html. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  30. NuVasive (2021) Solutions. NuVasive. https://www.nuvasive.com/surgical-solutions/. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  31. Medtronic (2021) Spinal & Orthopaedic Products. Medtronic. https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/spinal-orthopaedic.html. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  32. Piuzzi NS, Ng M, Song S et al (2019) Consolidation and maturation of the orthopaedic medical device market between 1999 and 2015. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29:759–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02372-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bergquist S, Otten T, Sarich N (2020) COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Heal Policy Technol 9:623–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. eFinance M (2017) What is Enterprise Value? eFinance Management. https://efinancemanagement.com/financial-analysis/enterprise-value. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Mitchell K. Ng, William J. Kridel Jr., Nicolas S. Piuzzi. Methodology: Mitchell K. Ng, William J. Kridel Jr., Nicolas S. Piuzzi. Formal analysis and investigation: Mitchell K. Ng, Andy Kuo, Patrick P. Nian. Writing - original draft preparation: Mitchell K. Ng, Andy Kuo, Patrick P. Nian. Writing - review and editing: Mitchell K. Ng, Andy Kuo, Patrick P. Nian, Afshin E. Razi, Che Hang Jason Wong, Michael A. Mont, Nicolas S. Piuzzi. Funding Acquisition: N/A. Resources: Mitchell K. Ng, William J. Kridel Jr. Supervision: Mitchell K. Ng, Afshin E. Razi, Che Hang Jason Wong, Michael A. Mont, Nicolas S. Piuzzi.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick P. Nian.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The current investigation was exempt from our institution’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval process.

Conflict of interest

Mitchell Ng, MD: Paid consultant at Ferghana Partners, Inc. Nicolas Piuzzi, MD: Paid research support at Regenlab and Zimmer, Board member/committee member of ISCT and Orthopaedic Research Society. Michael Mont, MD: Royalties from Microport, Stryker. Paid consultant at DJ Orthopaedics, Johnson and Johnson, Medical Compression Systems, Merz, Orthosensor, Pacira, Sage Products, Inc., Stryker, Tissue Gene, US Medical Innovations. Research support from DJ Orthopaedics, Johnson and Johnson, National Institutes of Health (NIAMS and NICHD), Ongoing Care Solutions, Orthosensor, Stryker, Tissue Gene. Medical/orthopaedics governing board of American Journal of Orthopaedics, Journal of Arthroplasty, Journal of Knee Surgery, Orthopedics, Surgical Technology International. Board member of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Andy Kuo, Patrick Nian, William Kridel, Afshin Razi, Che Hang Jason Wong have no disclosures to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, M.K., Kuo, A., Nian, P.P. et al. Market resilience of orthopaedic hip/knee arthroplasty sales during COVID-19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 1835–1841 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05228-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05228-2

Keywords

Navigation