Abstract
Introduction
Femoral stem subsidence can lead to aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for stem subsidence as it can affect the initial stability and osteointegration. We evaluated whether reduced bone mineral density is related to higher subsidence of the femoral stem after primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation.
Methods
79 patients who had undergone primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation were analyzed retrospectively. Subsidence of the femoral stem was measured on standing pelvic anterior–posterior radiographs after 4–6 weeks and one year. Patient individual risk factors for stem subsidence (stem size, canal flare index, canal fill ratio, body mass index (BMI), demographic data) were correlated. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed of the formal neck and the lumbar spine including the calculation of T-score and Z-score. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated 12 months postoperatively.
Results
Stem subsidence appeared regardless of BMD (overall collective 2.3 ± 1.64 mm). Measure of subsidence was even higher in patients with normal BMD (2.8 ± 1.7 mm vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.05). High BMI was correlated with increased stem subsidence (p = 0.015). Subsidence had no impact on improvement of patient-related outcome measures (WOMAC, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) after THA. Patients with low BMD reported lower quality of life 12 month postoperatively compared to patients with normal BMD (EQ-5D-5L 0.82 vs. 0.91, p = 0.03).
Conclusion
Stable fixation of a cementless stem succeeds also in patients with reduced BMD. Regarding stem subsidence, enhanced recovery rehabilitation can be safely applied in patients with low BMD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597):1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2018) Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty: 2018 annual report. AOA, Adelaide Australia
Campbell D, Mercer G, Nilsson KG et al (2011) Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study. Int Orthop 35(4):483–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0913-z
Froimson MI, Garino J, Machenaud A et al (2007) Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. J Arthroplast 22(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.03.003
Al-Najjim M, Khattak U, Sim J et al (2016) Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem. J Orthop 13(4):322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2016.06.026
Ström H, Nilsson O, Milbrink J et al (2007) Early migration pattern of the uncemented CLS stem in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238785.98606.9d
Selvaratnam V, Shetty V, Sahni V (2015) Subsidence in collarless Corail hip replacement. Open Orthop J 9:194–197. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010194
Warth LC, Grant TW, Naveen NB et al (2020) Inadequate metadiaphyseal fill of a modern taper-wedge stem increases subsidence and risk of aseptic loosening: technique and distal canal fill matter! J Arthroplast 35(7):1868–1876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.024
Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS et al (2011) Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(5):500–509. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00774
Aro HT, Alm JJ, Moritz N et al (2012) Low BMD affects initial stability and delays stem osseointegration in cementless total hip arthroplasty in women: a 2-year RSA study of 39 patients. Acta Orthop 83(2):107–114. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.678798
Piarulli G, Rossi A, Zatti G (2013) Osseointegration in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 25(Suppl):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0103-0
Nixon M, Taylor G, Sheldon P et al (2007) Does bone quality predict loosening of cemented total hip replacements? J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(10):1303–1308. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B10.19038
Franklin J, Malchau H (2007) Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 38(6):655–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.049
Narayanan R, Elbuluk Am, Chen KK et al (2021) Does femoral morphology and stem alignment influence outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty with proximally coated double-tapered titanium stems? Hip Int: J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 31(3):354–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700019891702
Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20(7):1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.050304
Blake GM, Fogelman I (2007) The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Postgrad Med J 83(982):509–517. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2007.057505
Moritz N, Alm JJ, Lankinen P et al (2011) Quality of intertrochanteric cancellous bone as predictor of femoral stem RSA migration in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 44(2):221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.012
Mears SC, Richards Am, Knight TA et al (2009) Subsidence of uncemented stems in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic cadaveric femora. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H, J Eng Med 223(2):189–194. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM445
Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ et al (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148–165
Zhao R, Cai H, Liu Y et al (2017) Risk factors for intraoperative proximal femoral fracture during primary cementless THA. Orthopedics 40(2):e281–e287. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20161116-06
Vidalain J-P (2011) Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem. Int Orthop 35(2):189–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1117-2
Russell LA (2013) Osteoporosis and orthopedic surgery: effect of bone health on total joint arthroplasty outcome. Curr Rheumatol Rep 15(11):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-013-0371-x
Konstantinidis L, Helwig P, Hirschmüller A et al (2016) When is the stability of a fracture fixation limited by osteoporotic bone? Injury 47(Suppl):2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(16)47005-1
Dyreborg K, Sørensen MS, Flivik G et al (2021) Preoperative BMD does not influence femoral stem subsidence of uncemented THA when the femoral T-score is > – 2.5. Acta Orthop 92(5):538–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1920163
Aro HT, Engelke K, Mattila K et al (2021) Volumetric bone mineral density in cementless total hip arthroplasty in postmenopausal women: effects on primary femoral stem stability and clinical recovery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 103(12):1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01614
Nazari-Farsani S, Vuopio M, Löyttyniemi E et al (2021) Contributing factors to the initial femoral stem migration in cementless total hip arthroplasty of postmenopausal women. J Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110262
Troelsen A, Malchau E, Sillesen N et al (2013) A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(7):2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7
Vind TD, Jørgensen PB, Vainorius D et al (2023) Migration pattern of cemented Exeter short stem in Dorr type A femurs. A prospective radiostereometry study with 2-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143(2):1071–1080
Leiss F, Götz JS, Meyer M et al (2022) Differences in femoral component subsidence rate after THA using an uncemented collarless femoral stem: full weight-bearing with an enhanced recovery rehabilitation versus partial weight-bearing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(4):673–680
Ries C, Boese CK, Dietrich F et al (2019) Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study. Int Orthop 43(2):307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4020-x
Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M et al (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34(7):859–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00040-9
Søballe K, Toksvig-Larsen S, Gelineck J et al (1993) Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses. A Roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 75(5):681–687. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8397213
Nebergall AK, Rolfson O, Rubash HE et al (2016) Stable fixation of a cementless, proximally coated, double wedged, double tapered femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: a 5-year radiostereometric analysis. J Arthroplasty 31(6):1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.036
Kärrholm J, Borssén B, Löwenhielm G et al (1994) Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Jt Surg Br 76(6):912–917
Engh CA, O’Connor D, Jasty M et al (1992) Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:13–29
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Regensburg (22-2764-104).
Consent to participate
For this type of study consent to participate was not required.
Consent for publication
For this type of study consent for publication was not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Leiss, F., Goetz, J.S., Schindler, M. et al. Influence of bone mineral density on femoral stem subsidence after cementless THA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 451–458 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05006-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05006-6