Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Latissimus Dorsi and Teres major tendon transfer increases internal rotation torque following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty with subscapularis insufficiency

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Limitation of active Internal Rotation (IR) following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with massive Rotator Cuff Tears (mRCTs) with subscapularis insufficiency remains a challenge. Recently, RSA with Latissimus dorsi and Teres major (LDTM) transfer in patients with limited active IR has been demonstrated as a reliable treatment option. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare the IR torque following LDTM transfer with RSA in mRCT with subscapularis insufficiency to RSA without tendon transfer.

Methods

Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested (mean age: 64.5 ± 1.9 years) using a custom shoulder testing system that permits loading conditions of mRCT with subscapularis insufficiency. Two conditions were tested and compared. The first condition was RSA alone and the second condition was RSA with LDTM transfer. RSA with a medialized glenoid and lateralized humerus design was used for all specimens. The specimens were tested at 0°, 20° and 40° abduction at three different muscle loads: baseline, double, and triple, while the Teres minor and deltoid loads were kept constant. IR torque was measured with a torque wrench at 0°, 20°, and 40° abduction and 60° and 45° IR positions. Force required for anterior dislocation was measured at 20° abduction and 10° IR position.

Results

RSA with LDTM transfer had significantly higher IR torque at all abductions and muscle loading compared with RSA without transfer (average at all positions; RSA without transfer: 0.80 ± 0.02 Nm, LDTM transfer for all loads: 1.43 ± 0.10 Nm). RSA with LDTM transfer (91.4 ± 3.9 N) needed higher force for anterior dislocation compared to RSA alone (89.4 ± 4.1 N), but there was no significant difference.

Conclusion

LDTM transfer with RSA increases IR torque compared to RSA without tendon transfer in a cadaveric model. LDTM transfer with RSA may be a reliable treatment option for patients with mRCT and subscapularis insufficiency who are expected to have limited active IR following RSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F (2005) Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1 Suppl S):147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Drake GN, O’Connor DP, Edwards TB (2010) Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(6):1526–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1188-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Holcomb JO, Cuff D, Petersen SA, Pupello DR, Frankle MA (2009) Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid baseplate failure after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18(5):717–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clouthier AL, Hetzler MA, Fedorak G, Bryant JT, Deluzio KJ, Bicknell RT (2013) Factors affecting the stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(4):439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutiérrez S, Levy JC, Frankle MA, Cuff D, Keller TS, Pupello DR et al (2008) Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17(4):608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kontaxis A, Chen X, Berhouet J, Choi D, Wright T, Dines DM et al (2017) Humeral version in reverse shoulder arthroplasty affects impingement in activities of daily living. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(6):1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liou W, Yang Y, Petersen-Fitts GR, Lombardo DJ, Stine S, Sabesan VJ (2017) Effect of lateralized design on muscle and joint reaction forces for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(4):564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C (2005) Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14(5):524–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Streit JJ, Shishani Y, Gobezie R (2015) Medialized versus lateralized center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 38(12):e1098–e1103. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151120-06

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerber C, Pennington SD, Lingenfelter EJ, Sukthankar A (2007) Reverse Delta-III total shoulder replacement combined with latissimus dorsi transfer. A preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol 89(5):940–947. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.F.00955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim MS, Jeong HY, Kim JD, Ro KH, Rhee SM, Rhee YG (2020) Difficulty in performing activities of daily living associated with internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(1):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rojas J, Joseph J, Liu B, Srikumaran U, McFarland EG (2018) Can patients manage toileting after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review. Int Orthop 42(10):2423–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3900-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau P, Rumian AP, Zumstein MA (2010) Reversed shoulder arthroplasty with modified L’Episcopo for combined loss of active elevation and external rotation. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19(2 Suppl):20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Neyton L, Trojani C (2007) Modified latissimus Dorsi and Teres major transfer through a single delto-pectoral approach for external rotation deficit of the shoulder: as an isolated procedure or with a reverse arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(6):671–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi LL, Cahill KE, Ek ET, Tompson JD, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2015) Latissimus Dorsi and Teres major transfer with reverse shoulder arthroplasty restores active motion and reduces pain for posterosuperior cuff dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(10):3212–3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4433-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Young BL, Connor PM, Schiffern SC, Roberts KM, Hamid N (2020) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without latissimus and teres major transfer for patients with combined loss of elevation and external rotation: a prospective, randomized investigation. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(5):874–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Werthel JD, Schoch BS, Hooke A, Sperling JW, An KN, Valenti P et al (2021) Biomechanical effectiveness of tendon transfers to restore active internal rotation in shoulder with deficient subscapularis with and without reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 30(5):1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan K, Langohr GDG, Athwal GS, Johnson JA (2022) The biomechanical effectiveness of tendon transfers to restore rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: latissimus versus lower trapezius. Should Elb 14(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573220946257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baek CH, Kim JG, Baek GR (2022) Restoration of active internal rotation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major combined transfer. J Shoulder Elb Surg 31(6):1154–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baek CH, Kim JG, Baek GR (2022) Outcomes of combined anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 31(11):2298–2307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Werthel JD, Walch G, Vegehan E, Deransart P, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Valenti P (2019) Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. Int Orthop 43(10):2349–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04365-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gutiérrez S, Comiskey CA, Luo ZP, Pupello DR, Frankle MA (2008) Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol 90(12):2606–2615. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.00012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gutiérrez S, Greiwe RM, Frankle MA, Siegal S, Lee WE 3rd (2007) Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(3 Suppl):S9-s12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L (2014) Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(2):151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gulotta LV, Choi D, Marinello P, Knutson Z, Lipman J, Wright T et al (2012) Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(9):1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Erickson BJ, Shishani Y, Bishop ME, Patel M, Jones S, Romeo AA et al (2020) Subscapularis repair during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a stem-based double-row repair: sonographic and clinical outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med 8(3):2325967120906806. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120906806

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Baek GR, Kim JG, Kwak D, Nakla AP, Chung MS, McGarry MH et al (2022) Biomechanical comparison of combined latissimus Dorsi and Teres major tendon transfer versus latissimus Dorsi tendon transfer in shoulders with irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oh JH, Shin SJ, McGarry MH, Scott JH, Heckmann N, Lee TQ (2014) Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(8):1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2012) Are there advantages of the combined latissimus-dorsi transfer according to L’Episcopo compared to the isolated latissimus-dorsi transfer according to Herzberg after a mean follow-up of 6 years? A matched-pair analysis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(11):1499–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mulla DM, Hodder JN, Maly MR, Lyons JL, Keir PJ (2020) Glenohumeral stabilizing roles of the scapulohumeral muscles: implications of muscle geometry. J Biomech 100:109589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferle M, Pastor MF, Hagenah J, Hurschler C, Smith T (2019) Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28(5):966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Henninger HB, Barg A, Anderson AE, Bachus KN, Burks RT, Tashjian RZ (2012) Effect of lateral offset center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(9):1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Franceschetti E, de Sanctis EG, Ranieri R, Palumbo A, Paciotti M, Franceschi F (2019) The role of the subscapularis tendon in a lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: repair versus nonrepair. Int Orthop 43(11):2579–2586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4275-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Friedman RJ, Flurin PH, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Roche CP (2017) Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(4):662–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vourazeris JD, Wright TW, Struk AM, King JJ, Farmer KW (2017) Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in patients with subscapularis repair versus tenotomy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(3):450–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Werner BC, Wong AC, Mahony GT, Craig EV, Dines DM, Warren RF et al (2018) Clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without subscapularis repair: the importance of considering glenosphere lateralization. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26(5):e114–e119. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by Yeosu Baek Hospital, Yeosu-si, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea. The funding source did not play a role in the investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, 800 S Raymond Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA

    Gyu Rim Baek, Gyuna Baek, Min-Shik Chung, Owen Kao, Michelle H. McGarry & Thay Q. Lee

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeosu Baek Hospital, Yeosu-si, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea

    Jung Gon Kim & Chang Hee Baek

Authors
  1. Gyu Rim Baek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jung Gon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chang Hee Baek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gyuna Baek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Min-Shik Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Owen Kao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michelle H. McGarry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thay Q. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Methodology: MHM, MS; TQL, Ph.D.; data collection and analysis were performed by GRB, BS; CHB, MD; JGK, MD; Gyuna Baek; M-SC, BS; OK, BS; MHM, MS. Funding acquisition: TQL, Ph.D. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GRB, BS and JGK, MD and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Investigation performed at Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thay Q. Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was not required for this cadaveric study.

Informed consent

NA as this was a basic science cadaveric study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baek, G.R., Kim, J.G., Baek, C.H. et al. Latissimus Dorsi and Teres major tendon transfer increases internal rotation torque following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty with subscapularis insufficiency. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 5759–5766 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04861-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04861-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation