Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of an augmentative plating in the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Owing to its distinct biomechanical properties, nonunion is common (7–20%) after intramedullary (IM) nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Unlike diaphyseal nonunion, it is difficult to provide sufficient stability by exchanging nailing alone in subtrochanteric nonunion. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion initially treated with an IM nail and subsequently managed with minimally invasive augmentative plate fixation.

Materials and methods

Nineteen patients were enrolled retrospectively. The mechanisms of initial injury were traffic accidents in 8, falls from a height in seven, and slipping in two patients. Two patients with atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures without a specific trauma history were further included. All patients underwent IM nailing as the index operation. Nonunion surgery was performed an average of 45.2 weeks after the initial surgery. In cases of hardware damage and/or atrophic nonunion, exchange nailing and bone grafting were performed in addition to augmentative plating, as necessary. Conversely, augmentative plating alone was performed in cases of hypertrophic nonunion without any failure of the preexisting IM nail or malalignment. A narrow locking compression plate was fixed after contouring according to the shape of the proximal femur. The mean follow-up period was 36.1 months.

Results

Bony union was achieved in 18/19 patients (94.7%), at an average of 19.8 weeks after nonunion surgery. In the case that did not heal even after exchange nailing, additional plating and bone grafting, further autogenous bone grafting was required after 11 months, which healed uneventfully. There were 2 cases of soft tissue irritation over the plate, but no major complications were observed.

Conclusions

Additional plate augmentation over a retained IM nail yields satisfactory outcomes in terms of the bony union in subtrochanteric nonunion. Given its expected biomechanical superiority and relatively easy surgical technique, it may be a reasonable option for the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krappinger D, Wolf B, Dammerer D, Thaler M, Schwendinger P, Lindtner RA (2019) Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:769–777

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ (2004) Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur. Clin Orthop 419:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yun HH, Oh CH, Yi JW (2013) Subtrochanteric femoral fracture during trochanteric nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft fracture. Clin Orthop Surg 5:230–234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon RS, Donegan DJ, Liporace FA (2015) Reducing subtrochanteric femur fractures: tips and tricks, do’s and dont’s. J Orthop Trauma 29(Suppl 4):S28-33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig NJ, Sivaji C, Maffulli N (2001) Subtrochanteric fractures. A review of treatment options. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 60:35–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang S, McAndrew MP, Johnson KD (1995) The reconstruction locked nail for complex fractures of the proximal femur. J Orthop Trauma 9:453–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG, Rueda D, Larrauri PM, Soler JJ (1998) Use of the gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker MJ, Dutta BK, Sivaji C, Pryor GA (1997) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Injury 28:91–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siebenrock KA, Müller U, Ganz R (1998) Indirect reduction with a condylar blade plate for osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 29(3 Suppl.):C7-15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sims SH (2002) Subtrochanteric femur fractures. Orthop Clin N Am 33:113–26.viii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giannoudis PV, Ahmad MA, Mineo GV, Tosounidis TI, Calori GM, Kanakaris NK (2013) Subtrochanteric fracture nonunions with implant failure managed with the “Diamond” concept. Injury 44(Suppl 1):S76-81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lo YC, Su YP, Hsieh CP, Huang CH (2019) Augmentation plate fixation for treating subtrochanteric fracture nonunion. Indian J Orthop 53:246–250

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Brinker MR, O’Connor DP (2007) Exchange nailing of ununited fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89-A:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amorosa LF, Jayaram PR, Wellman DS, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2014) The use of the 95-degree-angled blade plate in femoral non-union surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:953–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lotzien S, Rausch V, Schildhauer TA, Gessmann J (2018) Revision of subtrochanteric non-unions after intramedullary nailing with dynamic condylar screw. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:448

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Balasubramanian N, Babu G, Prakasam S (2016) Treatment of nonunions of subtrochanteric fractures using an anatomical proximal femur locked compression plate-a prospective study of 13 patients. J Orthop Case Rep 6:65–68

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Somford MP, van den Bekerom MP, Kloen P (2013) Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 8:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pihlajamäki HK, Salminen ST, Böstman OM (2002) The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16:394–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swanson EA, Garrard EC, Bernstein DT, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR (2015) Results of a systematic approach to exchange nailing for the treatment of aseptic femoral nonunions. J Orthop Trauma 29:21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietze C, Brand A, Friederichs J, Stuby F, Schneidmueller D, von Rüden C (2022) Results of revision intramedullary nailing with and without auxillary plate in aseptic trochanteric and subtrochanteric nonunion. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48:1905–1911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson KD, Tencer AF, Blumenthal S, August A, Johnston DW (1986) Biomechanical performance of locked intramedullary nail systems in comminuted femoral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 206:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weresh MJ, Hakanson R, Stover MD, Sims SH, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ (2000) Failure of exchange reamed intramedullary nails for ununited femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 14:335–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Banaszkiewicz PA, Sabboubeh A, McLeod I, Maffulli N (2003) Femoral exchange nailing for aseptic non-union: not the end to all problems. Injury 34:349–35624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang KH, Kim JR, Park J (2012) Nonisthmal femoral shaft nonunion as a risk factor for exchange nailing failure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Gupta N, Vijay V (2016) Plate augmentation with retention of intramedullary nail is effective for resistant femoral shaft non-union. J Orthop 13:242–245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. de Vries JS, Kloen P, Borens O, Marti RK, Helfet DL (2006) Treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions. Injury 37:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen CM, Su YP, Hung SH, Lin CL, Chiu FY (2010) Dynamic compression plate and cancellous bone graft for aseptic nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral fracture. Orthopedics 33:393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chiang JC, Johnson JE, Tarkin IS, Siska PA, Farrell DJ, Mormino MA (2016) Plate augmentation for femoral nonunion: more than just a salvage tool? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:149–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Garnavos C (2017) Treatment of aseptic non-union after intramedullary nailing without removal of the nail. Injury 48(Suppl 1):S76–S81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jhunjhunwala HR, Dhawale AA (2016) Is augmentation plating an efffective treatment for non-union of femoral shaft fractures with nail in situ? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42:339–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shukla S, Johnston P, Ahmad MA, Wynn-Jones H, Patel AD, Walton NP (2007) Outcome of traumatic subtrochanteric femoral fractures fixed using cephalomedullary nails. Injury 38:1286–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Barquet A, Mayora G, Fregeiro J, Lopez L, Rienzi D, Francescoli L (2004) The treatment of subtrochanteric non-unions with the long gamma nail: twenty-six patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 18:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HR22C1832).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Wug Oh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The design and protocol of this study were approved by the institutional review board of Kyungpook National University Hospital.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JW., Oh, CW., Park, KH. et al. The role of an augmentative plating in the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 4915–4923 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04767-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04767-4

Keywords

Navigation