Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: three-dimensional measurement of drilling precision reveals high accuracy and no difference between fluoroscopically controlled core decompression and cancellous bone grafting

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) is a widespread disease affecting mostly young and active people, often exacerbating in progressive stages, ending in joint replacement. The most common joint preserving operative therapy for early stages is core decompression (CD), optional with cancellous bone grafting (CBG). For success it is vital that the necrotic area is hit and the sclerotic rim is broken by drilling into the defect zone to relieve intraosseous pressure. The aim of this study was to investigate if both techniques are precise enough to hit the center of the necrosis and if there is a difference in precision between drilling with small pins (CD) and the trephine (CBG).

Patients and methods

10 patients underwent CD, 12 patients CBG with conventional C-arm imaging. Postoperatively 3D MRI reconstructions of the necrotic area and the drilling channels were compared. The deviation of the drilling channel from the center of the necrotic area was measured. PROMs (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D, SF-36) were evaluated to compare the clinical success of these procedures.

Results

Neither with CD nor with CBG the defect zone was missed. The drilling precision of both procedures did not differ significantly: distance to center 3.58 mm for CD (range 0.0–14.06, SD 4.2) versus 3.91 mm for CBG (range 0.0–15.27, SD 4.7). PROMs showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

Concerning the most important difference between the two procedures—the surgical higher demanding technique of CBG—we suggest applying the less invasive technique of CD alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lieberman MR, Bery DJ, Mont MA, Aaron RK (2002) Osteonecrosis of the hip: management in the twenty-first century. J Bone Joint Surg 52:834–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koo KH, Lee JS, Lee YS, Kim KJ, Yoo JJ, Kim HJ (2006) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms in patients with nontraumatic femoral head osteonecrosis. J Orthop Res 24:1722–1728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rader C (2007) Transient osteoporosis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Risk factors, classification and differential diagnosis. Orthopade 36:423–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Houdek MT, Wyles CC, Martin JR, Sierra RJ (2014) Stem cell treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: current perspectives. Stem Cells Cloning 7:65–70

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Y, Li Y, Mao K (2003) Alcohol-induced adipogenesis in bone and marrow: a possible mechanism for osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:213–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mont MA, Jones LC, Hungerford DS (2006) Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg 88:1117–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee MS, Hsieh PH, Shih CH, Wang CJ (2010) Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head – from clinical to bench. Chang Gung Med J 33:351–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Y, Yue-Bai L, Yi-Sheng Y (2006) Dexamethasone-induced adipogenesis stromal cell cultures: mechanism of steroid-induced osteonecrosis. Chinese Med J 119:581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lukoschek M, Simank HG, Brocai D, Strauch K (1999) Core decompression in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: risk-factor-dependent outcome evaluation using survivorship analysis. Int Orthop 23:154–159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Adekile A, Haider M, Marouf R (2005) HLA-DRB1 alleles in Hb SS patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Am J Hematol 79:8–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Craiovan B, Baier C, Grifka J, Götz J, Schaumburger J, Beckmann J (2013) Bone marrow edema syndrome. Orthopade 42:191–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kramer J, Scheurecker G, Scheurecker A, Stöger A, Huber A, Hofmann S (2009) Femoral head necrosis. Radiologe 49:410–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang CJ, Wang FS, Huang CC, Yang KD, Weng LH, Huang HY (2005) Treatment for osteonecrosis of femoral head: comparison of extracorporeal shock waves with core decompression and bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg 87:2380–2387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aigner N, Petje G, Schneider W, Meizer R, Kotsaris S, Knahrl K et al (2005) Bone marrow edema syndrome of the femoral head: treatment with the prostacyclin analogue iloprost An MRI-controlled study. Wien Klin Wochenschr 117:130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajpura A, Wright A, Board T (2011) Medical management of osteonecrosis of the hip: a review. Hip Int 21:385–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li X, Xu X, Wu W (2014) Comparison of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and core decompression in treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7:5024–5030

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth A, Beckmann J, Bohndorf K, Fischer A, Heiss C, Kenn W et al (2016) S3-Guideline non-traumatic adult femoral head necrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:165–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adrian F, Deepak B, Riyaz J, David H (1994) Long term results of core decompression for ischemic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 76:42–49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simank HG, Brocai DR, Strauch K, Lukoschek M (1999) Core decompression in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: risk-factor-dependent outcome evaluation using survivorship analysis. Int Orthop 23:154–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rocchi M, Del Piccolo N, Mazzotta A, Giavaresi G, Fini M et al (2020) Core decompression with bone chips allograft in combination with fibrin platelet-rich plasma and concentrated autologous mesenchymal stromal cells, isolated from bone marrow: results for the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head after 2 years minimum follow-up. Hip Int 30:3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hernigou P, Gerber D, Auregan JC (2020) Knee osteonecrosis: cell therapy with computer-assisted navigation. Surg Technol Int 36:281–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinot P, Dartus J, Justo A, Riouach H, Cremer P et al (2020) Does augmented core decompression decrease the rate of collapse and improve survival of femoral head avascular necrosis? Case-control study comparing 184 augmented core decompressions to 79 standard core decompressions with a minimum 2 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106:1561–1568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang JS, Suh YJ, Moon K, Park JS, Roh TH et al (2018) Clinical efficiency of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a matched pair control study with simple core decompression. Stem Cell Res Ther 9:274

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Beckmann J, Goetz J, Baethis H, Kalteis T, Grifka J, Perlick L (2006) Precision of computer-assisted core decompression drilling of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:374–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Learmonth LD, Maloon S, Dall G (1990) Core decompression for early atraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 72:387–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Beckmann J, Tingart M, Perlick L, Lüring C, Grifka J, Anders S (2007) Navigated drilling for femoral head necrosis experimental and clinical results. Orthopade 36(4):58–465

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ficat R (1985) Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 67:3–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Beckmann J, Schmidt T, Schaumburger J, Rath B, Lüring C, Tingart M et al (2012) Infusion, core decompression, or infusion following core decompression in the treatment of bone edema syndrome and early avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Rheumatol Int 33:1561–1565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sallam A, Imam M, Salama K, Mohamed O (2017) Inverted femoral head graft versus standard core decompression in nontraumatic hip osteonecrosis at minimum 3 years follow-up. Hip Int 27:74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koo KH, Ahn I, Kim R, Song HR, Jeong ST, Na JB et al (1999) Bone marrow edema and associated pain in early stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: prospective study with serial MR images. Radiology 213:715–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tripathy S, Goyal T, Kumar R (2015) Management of femoral head osteonecrosis: current concepts. Indian J Orthop 49:28–45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaushik A, Das A, Cui Q (2012) Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: an update in year 2012. World J Orthop 3:49–57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Woerner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted after authorisation by the Institutional Ethical Board of the Medical University of Regensburg (No. 14-101-0108). It has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and has been carried out in accordance with regulations of the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Written informed consent for participation in this investigation was obtained from all patients.

Informed consent

Written informed consent for participation in this investigation was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The work was performed at University Hospital Regensburg, Department for Orthopaedic Surgery, Bad Abbach, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woerner, M., Voelkl, K., Ferner, F. et al. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: three-dimensional measurement of drilling precision reveals high accuracy and no difference between fluoroscopically controlled core decompression and cancellous bone grafting. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 4713–4719 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04753-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04753-2

Keywords

Navigation