Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Technical challenges and surgical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in patients with upper lumbar disc herniation: a prospective clinical study

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Upper lumbar disc herniation (ULDH) constitutes a considerably complex and rare anatomic entity. As such, there are only a handful of studies investigating the application of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the management of this cause of low back pain.

Research question

To elucidate the safety and effectiveness of PTED in patients with ULDH.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-six (26) individuals with diagnosed ULDH (L1–L2, L2–L3) according to clinical and radiologic criteria were prospectively evaluated in a 2-year follow-up period. All patients were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Clinical evaluation was conducted with visual analogue scale for lower limb (VAS-LP) and low back (VAS-BP) pain in conjunction with Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Medical Health Survey Questionnaire. Potential complications were recorded in each follow-up interval.

Results

One patient (3.8%) featured temporary postoperative dysesthesia that was completely resolved at 6 weeks. No other major perioperative complications were observed. Values of all studied indices were found to be statistically significantly ameliorated at the end of follow-up. Improvement was depicted to be quantitatively maximal at 6 weeks postoperatively.

Conclusions

PTED constitutes a safe and effective technique for surgical management of ULDH that merits further assessment in current clinical practice in the framework of multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Level of evidence

Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu C, Xue J, Liu J, Ma G, Moro A, Liang T, Zeng H, Zhang Z, Xu G, Lu Z, Zhan X (2021) Is there a correlation between upper lumbar disc herniation and multifidus muscle degeneration? Retrospect Study MRI Morphol 22:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03970-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Echt M, Holland R, Mowrey W, Cezayirli P (2021) Surgical outcomes for upper lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J 11:802–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220941815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanderson SP, Houten J, Errico T, Forshaw D, Bauman J, Cooper PR (2004) The unique characteristics of “upper” lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 55:385–389. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000129548.14898.9b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim JU, Liu WC (2009) Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration. Acta Neurochir 151:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0204-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jing Z, Li L, Song J (2021) Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective comparative study. Am J Transl Res 13:3111–3119

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang F, Dong Z, Li YP, Miao DC, Wang LF, Shen Y (2019) Wedge-shaped vertebrae is a risk factor for symptomatic upper lumbar disc herniation. J Orthop Surg Res 14:265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1314-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. He S, Ren Z, Zhang X, Li J (2020) Neurophysiologic monitoring for treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a case report on the significance of an increase in the amplitude of motor evoked potential responses after decompression and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 67:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.01.042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim HS, Paudel B, Jang JS, Lee K, Oh SH, Jang IT (2018) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for all types of lumbar disc herniations (LDH) including severely difficult and extremely difficult LDH cases. Pain Physician 21:E401-e408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapetanakis S, Gkantsinikoudis N, Chaniotakis C, Charitoudis G, Givissis P (2018) Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in obese patients: health-related quality of life assessment in a 2-year follow-up. World Neurosurg 113:e638–e649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapetanakis S, Gkantsinikoudis N, Charitoudis G (2021) Implementation of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in competitive elite athletes with lumbar disc herniation: original study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 49:3234–3241. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211032612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapetanakis S, Gkantsinikoudis N, Charitoudis G (2019) The role of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy in surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a health-related quality of life approach. Neurospine 16:96–104. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836334.167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapetanakis S, Floros E, Gkantsinikoudis N (2021) Extreme cases in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery: case series and brief review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2021.1944981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu J, Zhang C, Zheng W, Hong CS, Li C, Zhou Y (2016) Analysis of the Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation. World neurosurgery 92:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Z, Zhang C, Chen W, Li S, Yu B, Zhao H, Shen J, Zhang J, Wang Y, Yu K (2020) Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy versus conventional open lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative cohort study. BioMed Res Int 2020:1852070. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1852070

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang SQ, Zhang SM, Wu GN, Jin J, Lin H (2020) Treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy through two different approaches. Zhongguo gu shang = China J Orthopaed Traumatol 33:621–627. https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.07.006

  16. Kambin P, Brager MD (1987) Percutaneous posterolateral discectomy. Anatomy and mechanism. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res:145–154

  17. Lee JJ, Lee MK, Kim JE, Kim HZ, Park SH, Tae JH, Choi SS (2015) Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients. Pain Physician 18:E195-200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly AM (1998) Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 5:1086–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02667.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guilfoyle MR, Seeley H, Laing RJ (2009) The short form 36 health survey in spine disease–validation against condition-specific measures. Br J Neurosurg 23:401–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690902730731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jha RT, Syed HR, Catalino M, Sandhu FA (2017) Contralateral approach for minimally invasive treatment of upper lumbar intervertebral disc herniation: technical note and case series. World Neurosurg 100:583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Badejo OA, Okunlola AI, Shokunbi MT (2018) Upper lumbar disc prolapse. J West Afr Coll Surg 8:113–122

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Karaaslan B, Aslan A, Börcek A, Kaymaz M (2017) Clinical and surgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations: a retrospective study. Turk J Med Sci 47:1157–1160. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1604-113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yüce I, Kahyaoğlu O, Mertan P, Çavuşoğlu H, Aydın Y (2019) Analysis of clinical characteristics and surgical results of upper lumbar disc herniations. Neurochirurgie 65:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapetanakis S, Gkantsinikoudis N, Thomaidis T, Georgoudis M (2020) The endoscopic aspect of foraminal anatomy and dorsal root ganglion in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. Clin Case Rep 8:3616–3618. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.3347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin TY, Wang YC (2019) Surgical outcomes for upper lumbar disc herniation: decompression alone versus fusion surgery. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Son S, Lee SG, Kim WK, Ahn Y (2018) Advantages of a microsurgical translaminar approach (keyhole laminotomy) for upper lumbar disc herniation. World Neurosurg 119:e16–e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kapetanakis S, Gkasdaris G, Angoules AG, Givissis P (2017) Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy using transforaminal endoscopic spine system technique: pitfalls that a beginner should avoid. World J Orthoped 8:874–880. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i12.874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shin MH, Bae JS, Cho HL, Jang IT (2019) extradiscal epiduroscopic percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation a technical note. Clin Spine Surg 32:98–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu W, Yang B, Lai X, Hong X, Chen Z, Yu D (2021) Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 100:e27914. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000027914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Department and Deformities, Interbalkan European Medical Center, 55535, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Stylianos Kapetanakis, Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis & Sotirios Apostolakis

  2. Department of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Spine Surgery, Athens Medical Center, 15125, Athens, Greece

    Stylianos Kapetanakis

Authors
  1. Stylianos Kapetanakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sotirios Apostolakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stylianos Kapetanakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Protocol of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Interbalkan European Medical Center.

Informed consent

Patients provided written informed consent for the collection, processing and publication of their data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kapetanakis, S., Gkantsinikoudis, N. & Apostolakis, S. Technical challenges and surgical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in patients with upper lumbar disc herniation: a prospective clinical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 4613–4623 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04725-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04725-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation