Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complete blood platelet and lymphocyte ratios increase diagnostic accuracy of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Systemically, changes in serum platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PVR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte to lymphocyte (MLR) represent primary responses to early inflammation and infection. This study aimed to determine whether PLR, PVR, NLR, and MLR can be useful in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients.

Methods

A total of 464 patients that underwent revision THA with calculable PLR, PVR, NLR, and MLR in 2 groups was evaluated: 1) 191 patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of PJI, and 2) 273 matched patients treated for revision THA for aseptic complications.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of PLR combined with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial white blood cell count (WBC) and synovial polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) (97.9%; 98.5%) is significantly higher than only ESR combined with CRP, synovial WBC and synovial PMN (94.2%; 94.5%; p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of PVR combined with ESR, CRP and synovial WBC, and synovial PMN (98.4%; 98.2%) is higher than only ESR combined with CRP, synovial WBC and synovial PMN (94.2%; 94.5%; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The study results demonstrate that both PLR and PVR calculated from complete blood counts when combined with serum and synovial fluid markers have increased diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in THA patients.

Level of evidence:III, case–control retrospective analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elmallah RK, Chughtai M, Khlopas A et al (2018) Pain control in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31:504–513. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arauz P, Klemt C, Limmahakhun S, et al (2018) Stair Climbing and High Knee Flexion Activities in Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: In Vivo Kinematics and Articular Contact Analysis. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.013

  4. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klemt C, Tirumala V, Smith EJ et al (2020) Development of a preoperative risk calculator for re-infection following revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. George DA, Konan S, Haddad FS (2015) Single-Stage Hip and Knee Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty 30:2264–2270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klemt C, Tirumala V, Oganesyan R et al (2020) Single-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved functional outcomes: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klemt C, Tirumala V, Smith EJ et al (2021) Development of a preoperative risk calculator for reinfection following revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 36:693–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K et al (2018) The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty 33:1309-1314.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernard L, Lubbeke A, Stern R et al (2004) Value of preoperative investigations in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: retrospective cohort study and literature review. Scand J Infect Dis 36:410–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365540410015240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carli AV, Abdelbary H, Ahmadzai N et al (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of serum, synovial, and tissue testing for chronic periprosthetic joint infection after hip and knee replacements: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:635–649. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shahi A, Kheir MM, Tarabichi M et al (2017) Serum D-Dimer test is promising for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection and timing of reimplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wyatt MC, Beswick AD, Kunutsor SK et al (2016) The alpha-defensin immunoassay and leukocyte esterase colorimetric strip test for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:992–1000. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sigmund IK, Holinka J, Gamper J, et al (2017) Qualitative alpha-defensin test (Synovasure) for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in revision total joint arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 99-B:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0295.R1

  15. Paziuk T, Rondon AJ, Goswami K et al (2019) A novel adjunct indicator of periprosthetic joint infection: platelet count and mean platelet volume. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tirumala V, Klemt C, Xiong L et al (2020) Diagnostic utility of platelet count/lymphocyte count ratio and platelet count/mean platelet volume ratio in periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim NY, Chun D-H, Kim SY et al (2019) Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory indices, NLR, PLR, and MPV, for predicting 1-year survival of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050589

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahsen A, Ulu MS, Yuksel S et al (2013) As a new inflammatory marker for familial Mediterranean fever: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Inflammation 36:1357–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-013-9675-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uslu AU, Deveci K, Korkmaz S et al (2013) Is neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio associated with subclinical inflammation and amyloidosis in patients with familial Mediterranean fever? Biomed Res Int 2013:185317. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/185317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Erre GL, Paliogiannis P, Castagna F et al (2019) Meta-analysis of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Clin Invest 49:e13037. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mukanova U et al (2019) The Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as an inflammatory marker in rheumatic diseases. Ann Lab Med 39:345–357. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2019.39.4.345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao K, Zhu W, Liu W et al (2019) Diagnostic value of the blood monocyte-lymphocyte ratio in knee osteoarthritis. J Int Med Res 47:4413–4421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519860686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiang J, Zhou L, Li X et al (2017) Preoperative monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood predicts stages, metastasis, and histological grades in patients with ovarian cancer. Transl Oncol 10:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2016.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vulliamy P, McCluney S, Mukherjee S et al (2016) Postoperative elevation of the neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio predicts complications following esophageal resection. World J Surg 40:1397–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3427-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, et al (2020) The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 103-B:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1

  26. Fan Y, Xiao Y, Sabuhi WA et al (2019) Longitudinal model of periprosthetic joint infection in the rat. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aron ZD, Mehrani A, Hoffer ED et al (2021) trans-Translation inhibitors bind to a novel site on the ribosome and clear Neisseria gonorrhoeae in vivo. Nat Commun 12:1799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22012-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Q, Zhang P, Wu R et al (2018) Identifying the best marker combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for lung cancer screening by combining ROC curve and logistic regression analyses: is it feasible? Dis Markers 2018:2082840. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2082840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nosrati M, Dey D, Mehrani A et al (2019) Functionally critical residues in the aminoglycoside resistance-associated methyltransferase RmtC play distinct roles in 30S substrate recognition. J Biol Chem 294:17642–17653. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.011181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mendez JH, Mehrani A, Randolph P, Stagg S (2019) Throughput and resolution with a next-generation direct electron detector. IUCrJ 6:1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252519012661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jafari SM, Coyle C, Mortazavi SMJ et al (2010) Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2046–2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1251-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kwon Y-M, Mahajan J, Tirumala V et al (2020) Sensitivity and Specificity of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers in Diagnosis of Infection in Head-Neck Taper Corrosion of Metal-On-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Klemt C, Padmanabha A, Esposito JG, et al Elevated ESR and CRP Prior to Second-Stage Reimplantation Knee Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Are Associated with Increased Reinfection Rates. J Knee Surg

  34. Riccio G, Cavagnaro L, Akkouche W et al (2018) Qualitative alpha-defensin versus the main available tests for the diagnosis of periprosthetic Joinfile:///Users/christian/Downloads/bandj_bjj103-B_1534.rist infection: best predictor test? J bone Jt Infect 3:156–164. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.26401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Saleh A, George J, Faour M et al (2018) Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections. Bone Joint Res 7:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonanzinga T, Zahar A, Dütsch M et al (2017) How reliable is the alpha-defensin immunoassay test for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection? a prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:408–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4906-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Unsal E, Aksaray S, Koksal D, Sipit T (2005) Potential role of interleukin 6 in reactive thrombocytosis and acute phase response in pulmonary tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J 81:604–607. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2004.030544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Malpani R, Haynes MS, Clark MG et al (2019) Abnormally high, as well as low, preoperative platelet counts correlate with adverse outcomes and readmissions after elective total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34:1670–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klim SM, Amerstorfer F, Gruber G et al (2018) Fibrinogen - a practical and cost efficient biomarker for detecting periprosthetic joint infection. Sci Rep 8:8802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27198-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao C, Zhang Z, Yao Y et al (2018) Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio for acute deep vein thrombosis after total joint arthroplasty: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 13:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0745-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen G, Wu C, Luo Z et al (2016) Platelet-lymphocyte ratios: a potential marker for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 11:2737–2740. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S111254

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gölge UH, Kaymaz B, Pazarcı Ö et al (2016) Nötrofil Lenfosit Orani Protezli Eklem Enfeksiyonlarinda Tanısal Belirteç Olabilir. J Clin Anal Med 7:218–221. https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.3918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sigmund IK, Holinka J, Staats K et al (2021) Inferior performance of established and novel serum inflammatory markers in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections. Int Orthop 45:837–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04889-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang Z, Ji Y, Wang Z et al (2018) The association between platelet indices and deep surgical site infection after open induction internal fixation for traumatic limb fractures. Infect Drug Resist 11:2533–2538. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S184877

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Li S, Liu K, Zhang R et al (2019) Lower lymphocyte to monocyte ratio is a potential predictor of poor outcome in patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Stroke Vasc Neurol 4:148–153. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lin Y, Peng Y, Chen Y et al (2019) Association of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio and risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Biomark Med 13:1263–1272. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2018-0423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Eo WK, Chang HJ, Kwon SH et al (2016) The lymphocyte-monocyte ratio predicts patient survival and aggressiveness of ovarian cancer. J Cancer 7:289–296. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.13432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Inaoka K, Kanda M, Uda H et al (2017) Clinical utility of the platelet-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy for clinical T2–4 gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 23:2519–2526. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i14.2519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Xu H, Xie J-W, Liu L, et al (2021) Combination of CRP with NLR is a sensitive tool for screening fixation-related infection in patients undergoing conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed internal fixation for femoral neck fracture. Bone Joint J 103-B:1534–1540. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2021-0105.R1

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Min Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained for the retrospective patient chart review.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klemt, C., Tirumala, V., Smith, E.J. et al. Complete blood platelet and lymphocyte ratios increase diagnostic accuracy of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 1441–1449 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04309-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04309-w

Keywords

Navigation