Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal blocking screw placement for retrograde IM nail fixation of distal femur fracture: a standardized biomechanical study of “osteoporotic” synthetic bone

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Intramedullary (IM) nail use for metaphyseal fracture management is problematic in long bones like the femur because the larger medullary cavity allows increased fracture motion and potentially increased implant failure and malunion/nonunion risk; Achieving effective distal femur fracture fixation is even more difficult in osteoporotic bone. Blocking screws to control IM nail movement are known to be effective for tibia fracture management. Few studies have evaluated IM nail and blocking screw use efficacy for distal femur fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Methods

This study used an osteoporosis simulation synthetic bone model to evaluate retrograde IM nail fixation of a standardized non-comminuted, extra-articular distal femur fracture with and without blocking screws. The hypothesis was that use of one or two blocking screws would increase IM nail fixation stability as evidenced by greater peak IM nail load and lesser movement. A servohydraulic device under displacement control collected loading force versus movement deflection data. Shapiro–Wilk tests confirmed data normality. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were used to compare condition specific loading force and movement differences.

Result

In the coronal plane, blocking screw conditions displayed greater loading ranges (38.3 ± 2 vs. 19.1 ± 2 N, 100.5% difference) (p < 0.0001) and lesser movement (2.0 ± 0.3 vs. 6.86 ± 0.4 mm, 243% difference) (p < 0.0001). In the sagittal plane, the two blocking screw condition displayed a significantly greater loading magnitude (29.9 ± 6 vs. 20.8 ± 2.3 N, 43.8% difference) than the identical control condition without blocking screws (p = 0.018); however, movements were comparable (p = 0.82). Long-axis rotational loading failed to reveal load magnitude differences (p = 0.28); however, two different blocking screw conditions displayed decreased movement (1.32 ± 0.2 vs. 2.05 ± 0.3 mm, 53.8% difference) compared to other conditions (p ≤ 0.018).

Conclusions

Use of one or two blocking screws on the medial and lateral sides of the IM nail decreased coronal plane movement in the intramedullary canal. Combining retrograde IM nail implantation with blocking screws reduced medial–lateral IM nail movement and increased fracture stability. These characteristics may help prevent fixation failure, malunion, and even nonunion in patients with a distal femur fracture in osteoporotic bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ito K, Hungerbühler R, Wahl D, Grass R (2001) Improved intramedullary nail interlocking in osteoporotic bone. J Orthop Trauma 15(3):192–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200103000-00008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wähnert D, Hoffmeier K, Fröber R, Hofmann GO, Mückley T (2011) Distal femur fractures of the elderly—different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison. Injury 42(7):655–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim J, Kang S-B, Nam K, Rhee SH, Won Won J, Han H-S (2021) Retrograde intramedullary nailing for distal femur fracture with osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Surg 4:307–312. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2012.4.4.307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moloney GB, Pan T, Van Eck CF, Patel D, Tarkin I (2016) Geriatric distal femur fracture: are we underestimating the rate of local and systemic complications? Injury 47(8):1732–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan RW, Chahal GS, Davies M, Srinivas K (2014) A comparison of mortality following distal femoral fractures and hip fractures in an elderly population. Adv Orthop Surg. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/873785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Black DM, Abrahamsen B, Bouxsein ML, Einhorn T, Napoli N (2019) Atypical femur fractures: review of epidemiology, relationship to bisphosphonates, prevention, and clinical management. Endocr Rev 40:333–368. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahlborg HG, Rosengren BE, Teppo LN, Jarvinen TLN, Rogmark C, Nilsson J-A, Sernbo I, Karlsson MK (2010) Prevalence of osteoporosis and incidence of hip fracture in women - secular trends over 30 years. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010, 11:48. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/48. Accessed 19 Aug 2021

  8. Tennyson M, Krkovic M, Fortune M, Abdulkarim A (2020) Systematic review of the outcomes of poller screw augmentation in intramedullary nailing of long bone fracture. EFFORT Open Rev 5:189–203. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen AL, Strauss E (2004) Primary total knee arthroplasty for complex distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000132466.65220.62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buhren V, Maar DC, Maxey J (2010) T2 supracondylar nailing system operative technique. Stryker Trauma GmbH, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chao EY, Inoue N, Koo TK, Kim YH (2004) Biomechanical considerations of fracture treatment and bone quality maintenance in elderly patients and patients with osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000132263.14046.0c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18(8):494–502. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200409000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Auston D, Donohue D, Stoops K, Cox J, Diaz M, Santoni B, Mir H (2018) Long segment blocking screws increase the stability of retrograde nail fixation in geriatric supracondylar femur fractures: eliminating the “bell-clapper effect.” J Orthop Trauma 32(11):559–564. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Donald G, Seligson D (1983) Treatment of tibial shaft fractures by percutaneous Kuntscher nailing: Technical difficulties and a review of 50 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 178:64–73 (PMID: 6883869)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape HC, Miclau T (1999) The use of poller screws as blocking screws in stabilizing tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Jt Surg Br 81:963–968. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.10000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao K-D, Huang J-H, Li F, Wang Q-G, Li H-Q, Tao J, Wang J-D, Wu X-M, Wu X-F, Zhou Z-H, Wang F, Lu H-M (2009) Treatment of aseptic diaphyseal nonunion of the lower extremity with exchange intramedullary nailing and blocking screws without open bone graft. Orthop Surg 1(4):264–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7861.2009.00041.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim J-W, Yoon Y-C, Oh C-W, Han S-B, Sim J-A, Oh J-K (2018) Exchange nailing with enhanced distal fixation is effective for the treatment of infraisthmal femoral nonunions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 38:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2802-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seyhan M, Cakmak S, Donmez F, Gerell A (2013) Blocking screws for the treatment of distal femur fractures. Orthopedics 36(7):e936–e941. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130624-26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Stephan C, Möhlmann U, Tscherne H (1999) The mechanical effect of blocking screws (“Poller Screws”) in stabilizing tibia fractures with short proximal or distal fragments after insertion of small-diameter intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 13(8):550–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199911000-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wahnert D, Hoffmeier KL, Klos K, Stolarczyk Y, Frober R, Hofmann GO, Muckley T (2010) Biomechanical characterization of an osteoporotic artificial bone model for the distal femur. J Biomater Appl 26(5):565–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328210378057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2018. J Orthop Trauma 32(1):S1–S10. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson SG, Phillip RD, Roberts A (2018) How do orthopaedic surgeons and rehabilitation professionals interpret and assess ‘toe touch’ weight bearing and ‘partial’ weight bearing status in the rehabilitation setting? BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 4:e000326. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ostrum RF, Maurer JP (2009) Distal third femur fractures treated with retrograde femoral nailing and blocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 23(9):681–684. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e3181ad61f2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gavaskar AS, Chowdary N (2013) Blocking screws: an adjunct to retrograde nailing for distal femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 21(2):158–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901302100208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source. The authors declare they have no financial interests associated with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA

    R. Yakkanti, J. Kitchen, M. Voor, J. Nyland & B. Hartley

Authors
  1. R. Yakkanti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Kitchen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Voor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Nyland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Hartley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Nyland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yakkanti, R., Kitchen, J., Voor, M. et al. Optimal blocking screw placement for retrograde IM nail fixation of distal femur fracture: a standardized biomechanical study of “osteoporotic” synthetic bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 3827–3835 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04280-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04280-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation