Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing risk factors for treatment failure in fracture-related infection

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Fracture-related infection (FRI) represents a challenging clinical scenario. Limited evidence exists regarding treatment failure after initial management of FRI. The objective of our investigation was to determine incidence and risk factors for treatment failure in FRI.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for FRI between 2011 and 2015 at three level 1 trauma centers. One hundred and thirty-four patients treated for FRI were identified. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the medical record. Treatment failure was defined as the need for repeat debridement or surgical revision seven or more days after the presumed final procedure for infection treatment. Univariate comparisons were conducted between patients who experienced treatment failure and those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent associations with treatment failure.

Results

Of the 134 FRI patients, 51 (38.1%) experienced treatment failure. Patients who failed were more likely to have had an open injury (31% versus 17%; p = 0.05), to have undergone implant removal (p = 0.03), and additional index I&D procedures (3.3 versus 1.6; p < 0.001). Most culture results identified a single organism (62%), while 15% were culture negative. Treatment failure was more common in culture-negative infections (p = 0.08). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common organism associated with treatment failure (29%; p = 0.08). Multivariate regression demonstrated a statistically significant association between treatment failure and two or more irrigation and debridement (I&D) procedures (OR 13.22, 95% CI 4.77–36.62, p < 0.001) and culture-negative infection (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.26–17.83, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The rate of treatment failure following FRI continues to be high. Important risk factors associated with treatment failure include open fracture, implant removal, and multiple I&D procedures. While MRSA remains common, culture-negative infection represents a novel risk factor for failure, suggesting aggressive treatment of clinically diagnosed cases remains critical even without positive culture data.

Level of evidence

Retrospective cohort study; Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metsemakers WJ, Kuehl R, Moriarty TF et al (2018) Infection after fracture fixation: current surgical and microbiological concepts. Injury 49(3):511–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ (2002) The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23(4):183–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah RP, Plummer DR, Moric M, Sporer SM, Levine BR, Della Valle CJ (2016) Diagnosing infection in the setting of periprosthetic fractures. J Arthroplasty 31(9 Suppl):140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birt MC, Anderson DW, Bruce Toby E, Wang J (2017) Osteomyelitis: recent advances in pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. J Orthop 14(1):45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Darouiche RO (2004) Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med 350(14):1422–1429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakobsen TH, Eickhardt SR, Gheorghe AG et al (2018) Implants induce a new niche for microbiomes. APMIS 126(8):685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zimmerli W (2014) Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infection. J Intern Med 276(2):111–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, Senneville E et al (2020) General treatment principles for fracture-related infection: recommendations from an international expert group. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(8):1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tintle SM, Forsberg JA, Potter BK, Islinger RB, Andersen RC (2009) Prosthesis retention, serial debridement, and antibiotic bead use for the treatment of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics 32(2):87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moojen DJ, Zwiers JH, Scholtes VA, Verheyen CC, Poolman RW (2014) Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection. Acta Orthop 85(4):383–388

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Greene LR (2012) Guide to the elimination of orthopedic surgery surgical site infections: an executive summary of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology elimination guide. Am J Infect Control 40(4):384–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilgili F, Balci HI, Karaytug K et al (2015) Can normal fracture healing be achieved when the implant is retained on the basis of infection? An experimental animal model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(10):3190–3196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Foster AL, Moriarty TF, Zalavras C et al (2021) The influence of biomechanical stability on bone healing and fracture-related infection: the legacy of Stephan Perren. Injury 52(1):43–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tornero E, Morata L, Martinez-Pastor JC et al (2015) KLIC-score for predicting early failure in prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement, implant retention and antibiotics. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(8):786.e9-786.e17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Son MS, Chang ET, Zimmerli W, Parvizi J (2018) Are we winning or losing the battle with periprosthetic joint infection: trends in periprosthetic joint infection and mortality risk for the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 33(10):3238–3245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J (2012) Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty 27(8 Suppl):61-65.e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, McNally MA et al (2018) Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury 49(3):505–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hellebrekers P, Leenen LP, Hoekstra M, Hietbrink F (2017) Effect of a standardized treatment regime for infection after osteosynthesis. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hellebrekers P, Verhofstad MHJ, Leenen LPH, Varol H, van Lieshout EMM, Hietbrink F (2019) The effect of early broad-spectrum versus delayed narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy on the primary cure rate of acute infection after osteosynthesis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01182-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rightmire E, Zurakowski D, Vrahas M (2008) Acute infections after fracture repair: management with hardware in place. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(2):466–472

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gitajn IL, Heng M, Weaver MJ, Ehrlichman LK, Harris MB (2016) Culture-negative infection after operative fixation of fractures. J Orthop Trauma 30(10):538–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spitzmuller R, Gumbel D, Guthoff C et al (2019) Duration of antibiotic treatment and risk of recurrence after surgical management of orthopaedic device infections: a multicenter case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1):184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ovaska MT, Makinen TJ, Madanat R, Vahlberg T, Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J (2013) Predictors of poor outcomes following deep infection after internal fixation of ankle fractures. Injury 44(7):1002–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berkes M, Obremskey WT, Scannell B et al (2010) Maintenance of hardware after early postoperative infection following fracture internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(4):823–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi HR, Kwon YM, Freiberg AA, Nelson SB, Malchau H (2013) Periprosthetic joint infection with negative culture results: clinical characteristics and treatment outcome. J Arthroplasty 28(6):899–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim YH, Kulkarni SS, Park JW, Kim JS, Oh HK, Rastogi D (2015) Comparison of infection control rates and clinical outcomes in culture-positive and culture-negative infected total-knee arthroplasty. J Orthop 12(Suppl 1):S37-43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Torbert JT, Joshi M, Moraff A et al (2015) Current bacterial speciation and antibiotic resistance in deep infections after operative fixation of fractures. J Orthop Trauma 29(1):7–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Metsemakers WJ, Onsea J, Neutjens E et al (2017) Prevention of fracture-related infection: a multidisciplinary care package. Int Orthop 41(12):2457–2469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanchette KA, Wenke JC (2018) Current therapies in treatment and prevention of fracture wound biofilms: why a multifaceted approach is essential for resolving persistent infections. J Bone Jt Infect 3(2):50–67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Halawi MJ, Morwood MP (2015) Acute management of open fractures: an evidence-based review. Orthopedics 38(11):e1025–e1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Estes CS, Beauchamp CP, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ (2010) A two-stage retention debridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(8):2029–2038

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Park SH, Silva M, Bahk WJ, McKellop H, Lieberman JR (2002) Effect of repeated irrigation and debridement on fracture healing in an animal model. J Orthop Res 20(6):1197–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(4):453–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Metsemakers WJ, Kortram K, Morgenstern M et al (2018) Definition of infection after fracture fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to evaluate current practice. Injury 49(3):497–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Depypere M, Kuehl R, Metsemakers WJ et al (2020) Recommendations for systemic antimicrobial therapy in fracture-related infection: a consensus from an International Expert Group. J Orthop Trauma 34(1):30–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Govaert GAM, Kuehl R, Atkins BL et al (2020) Diagnosing fracture-related infection: current concepts and recommendations. J Orthop Trauma 34(1):8–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Mayahi M, Betz M, Muller DA et al (2013) Remission rate of implant-related infections following revision surgery after fractures. Int Orthop 37(11):2253–2258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Morgenstern M, Kuehl R, Zalavras CG et al (2021) The influence of duration of infection on outcome of debridement and implant retention in fracture-related infection. Bone Joint J. 103-B(2):213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work of this study was not supported by external funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taylor M. Yong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

This study underwent institutional review board (IRB) approval.

Informed consent

The requirement of informed consent was waived in this retrospective, minimal-risk study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yong, T.M., Rackard, F.A., Dutton, L.K. et al. Analyzing risk factors for treatment failure in fracture-related infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 1387–1392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04277-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04277-1

Keywords

Navigation