Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing bilateral feet computed tomography scans can improve surgical decision making for subtle Lisfranc injury

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Subtle Lisfranc injuries (SLIs) are challenging to diagnose. Although weightbearing (WB) radiographs have been suggested to identify SLIs, approximately 20% are missed on initial radiographic assessment. Computed tomography (CT) has been suggested as an alternative, but has not provided any diagnostic guideline. Therefore we compared measurement techniques on radiographs and bilateral foot CT scans for the efficiency of diagnosis and making surgical decisions for SLI.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated patients diagnosed with SLIs between January 2014 and January 2020. Distances between both medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base (C1M2), and the first and second metatarsal bases (M1M2), were measured on bilateral WB radiographs. Bilateral foot CT scans were taken, and the distances between C1M2 were checked on the axial and three points of the coronal plane (top, middle, and base). The surgical indication was > 1 mm of diastasis on CT scan. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at final follow-up. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were assessed.

Results

Thirty patients with SLIs were reviewed. Twenty-four patients underwent surgical fixation (Group A) and six patients were treated conservatively (Group B). The side-to-side difference (STSD) of C1M2 and M1M2 distances greater than 1 mm showed 91.7% and 54.2% sensitivity, and 66.7% and 16.7% specificity, respectively. Investigating STSDs of all points on CT scans were informative to discriminate both groups (P ≤ 0.038). Clinical outcomes showed no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.631). Intraclass and interclass correlation coefficient values showed good to very good reliability, except for STSD of WB M1M2 distance and the coronal top plane.

Conclusion

Investigating bilateral foot CT scans was significantly efficient and reliable for the diagnosis and treatment plan for SLI. On radiographs, STSD of WB C1M2 distance was more sensitive than STSD of WB M1M2 distance.

Level of evidence

Case control study; III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberta FG, Aronow MS, Barrero M, Diaz-Doran V, Sullivan RJ, Adams DJ (2005) Ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plate and transarticular screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int 26:462–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman DG (2020) Practical statistics for medical research Chapman and Hall, second edition. London and New York

  3. Arntz CT, Veith RG, Hansen ST Jr (1988) Fractures and fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joint. J Bone Jt Surg Am 70:173–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Backer HC, Vosseller JT (2020) Fibula fracture: plate versus nail fixation. Clin Orthop Surg 12:529–534

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan BY, Markhardt BK, Williams KL, Kanarek AA, Ross AB (2019) Os conundrum: identifying symptomatic sesamoids and accessory ossicles of the foot. AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:417–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi JY, Yu OJ, Suh JS (2021) Factors influencing postoperative residual diastasis after the operative treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04058-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coss HS, Manos RE, Buoncristiani A, Mills WJ (1998) Abduction stress and AP weightbearing radiography of purely ligamentous injury in the tarsometatarsal joint. Foot Ankle Int 19:537–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis MJ, Myerson M, Szura B (1993) Tarsometatarsal joint injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 21:497–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebraheim NA, Yang H, Lu J, Biyani A (1996) Computer evaluation of second tarsometatarsal joint dislocation. Foot Ankle Int 17:685–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eleftheriou KI, Rosenfeld PF, Calder JD (2013) Lisfranc injuries: an update. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1434–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faciszewski T, Burks RT, Manaster BJ (1990) Subtle injuries of the Lisfranc joint. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:1519–1522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta RT, Wadhwa RP, Learch TJ, Herwick SM (2008) Lisfranc injury: imaging findings for this important but often-missed diagnosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 37:115–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haapamaki V, Kiuru M, Koskinen S (2004) Lisfranc fracture-dislocation in patients with multiple trauma: diagnosis with multidetector computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int 25:614–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haapamaki VV, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK (2004) Ankle and foot injuries: analysis of MDCT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:615–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalia V, Fishman EK, Carrino JA, Fayad LM (2012) Epidemiology, imaging, and treatment of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations revisited. Skeletal Radiol 41:129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitsukawa K, Hirano T, Niki H, Tachizawa N, Nakajima Y, Hirata K (2015) MR imaging evaluation of the lisfranc ligament in cadaveric feet and patients with acute to chronic Lisfranc injury. Foot Ankle Int 36:1483–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Knijnenberg LM, Dingemans SA, Terra MP, Struijs PAA, Schep NWL, Schepers T (2018) Radiographic anatomy of the pediatric Lisfranc joint. J Pediatr Orthop 38:510–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo RS, Tejwani NC, Digiovanni CW, Holt SK, Benirschke SK, Hansen ST Jr, Sangeorzan BJ (2000) Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82:1609–1618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Skie M, Porshinsky B, Yeasting RA (1997) Radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of Lisfranc dislocation: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 18:351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ly TV, Coetzee JC (2006) Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88:514–520

    Google Scholar 

  21. Malhotra G, Cameron J, Toolan BC (2014) Diagnosing chronic diastasis of the syndesmosis: a novel measurement using computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int 35:483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nunley JA, Vertullo CJ (2002) Classification, investigation, and management of midfoot sprains: Lisfranc injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 30:871–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Panchbhavi VK, Andersen CR, Vallurupalli S, Yang J (2008) A minimally disruptive model and three-dimensional evaluation of Lisfranc joint diastasis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:2707–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pearce CJ, Calder JD (2010) Surgical anatomy of the midfoot. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:581–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peicha G, Labovitz J, Seibert FJ, Grechenig W, Weiglein A, Preidler KW, Quehenberger F (2002) The anatomy of the joint as a risk factor for Lisfranc dislocation and fracture-dislocation. An anatomical and radiological case control study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:981–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ponkilainen VT, Partio N, Salonen EE, Laine HJ, Maenpaa HM, Mattila VM, Haapasalo HH (2021) Outcomes after nonoperatively treated non-displaced Lisfranc injury: a retrospective case series of 55 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:1311–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ponkilainen VT, Partio N, Salonen EE et al (2020) Inter- and intraobserver reliability of non-weight-bearing foot radiographs compared with CT in Lisfranc injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03391-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Potter HG, Deland JT, Gusmer PB, Carson E, Warren RF (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of the Lisfranc ligament of the foot. Foot Ankle Int 19:438–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Preidler KW, Brossmann J, Daenen B, Goodwin D, Schweitzer M, Resnick D (1996) MR imaging of the tarsometatarsal joint: analysis of injuries in 11 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1217–1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rankine JJ, Nicholas CM, Wells G, Barron DA (2012) The diagnostic accuracy of radiographs in Lisfranc injury and the potential value of a craniocaudal projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W365-369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenbaum A, Dellenbaugh S, Dipreta J, Uhl R (2011) Subtle injuries to the Lisfranc joint. Orthopedics 34:882–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Saxena A, Eakin C (2007) Articular talar injuries in athletes: results of microfracture and autogenous bone graft. Am J Sports Med 35:1680–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Seo DK, Lee HS, Lee KW, Lee SK, Kim SB (2017) nonweightbearing radiographs in patients with a subtle Lisfranc injury. Foot Ankle Int 38:1120–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siddiqui NA, Galizia MS, Almusa E, Omar IM (2014) Evaluation of the tarsometatarsal joint using conventional radiography, CT, and MR imaging. Radiographics 34:514–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sivakumar BS, An VVG, Oitment C, Myerson M (2018) Subtle Lisfranc injuries: a topical review and modification of the classification system. Orthopedics 41:e168–e175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Solan MC, Moorman CT 3rd, Miyamoto RG, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM (2001) Ligamentous restraints of the second tarsometatarsal joint: a biomechanical evaluation. Foot Ankle Int 22:637–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sripanich Y, Steadman J, Krahenbuhl N, Rungprai C, Mills MK, Saltzman CL, Barg A (2020) Asymmetric lambda sign of the second tarsometatarsal joint on axial weight-bearing cone-beam CT scans of the foot: preliminary investigation for diagnosis of subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in a cadaveric model. Skeletal Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03445-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sripanich Y, Weinberg M, Krahenbuhl N, Rungprai C, Saltzman CL, Barg A (2020) Change in the first cuneiform-second metatarsal distance after simulated ligamentous Lisfranc injury evaluated by weightbearing CT scans. Foot Ankle Int 41:1432–1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sripanich Y, Weinberg MW, Krahenbuhl N, Rungprai C, Mills MK, Saltzman CL, Barg A (2020) Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review. Skeletal Radiol 49:31–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sripanich Y, Weinberg MW, Krahenbuhl N, Rungprai C, Saltzman CL, Barg A (2021) Reliability of measurements assessing the Lisfranc joint using weightbearing computed tomography imaging. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:775–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stavlas P, Roberts CS, Xypnitos FN, Giannoudis PV (2010) The role of reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: a systematic review of the literature. Int Orthop 34:1083–1091

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Stein RE (1983) Radiological aspects of the tarsometatarsal joints. Foot Ankle 3:286–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang CW, Roidis N, Vaishnav S, Patel A, Thordarson DB (2003) Position of the distal fibular fragment in pronation and supination ankle fractures: a CT evaluation. Foot Ankle Int 24:561–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thompson MC, Mormino MA (2003) Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint complex. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vuori JP, Aro HT (1993) Lisfranc joint injuries: trauma mechanisms and associated injuries. J Trauma 35:40–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Watson TS, Shurnas PS, Denker J (2010) Treatment of Lisfranc joint injury: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:718–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu-Kai Y, Shiu-Bii L (2015) Anatomic parameters of the Lisfranc joint complex in a radiographic and cadaveric comparison. J Foot Ankle Surg 54:883–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: DWS. Data curation: EC, DWS, SCS. Formal analysis: S-YS, JWL. Funding acquisition: N/A. Investigation: DWS, EC, Y-CP, SCS. Methodology: S-YS, JWL. Project administration: JWL, Y-CP. Resources: EC, DWS, SCS. Software: DWS, Y-CP. Supervision: JWL. Validation: Y-CP, S-YS. Visualization: DWS, JWL, S-YS. Writing—original draft: DWS. Writing—review and editing: S-YS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Yong Sung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary’s Institutional Review Board (IS20RISI0058).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shim, D.W., Choi, E., Park, YC. et al. Comparing bilateral feet computed tomography scans can improve surgical decision making for subtle Lisfranc injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 3705–3714 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04182-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04182-7

Keywords

Navigation