Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Active robotic technologies for total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

When active robotic technologies for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) were introduced over 20 years ago, broad usage of robotic technology was not felt to be needed as early data suggested no clear improvement in clinical outcomes compared to conventional techniques of implantation. Only recently has there been renewed enthusiasm for use of robotic technologies for implantation.

Materials and methods

Active robotic technology specifically refers to the use of a robot for planning and executing the surgical procedure—with surgeon guidance and control. The physical work of bone preparation is performed by a milling tool, following a cut path defined by a CT-based preoperative plan. This manuscript describes the IDE experience of the only active robotic system (ARoS) available in the US, which took place from February 2017 through December 2018.

Results

115 patients were enrolled in an IDE study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an ARoS for TKA. No previously described safety issues for TKA occurred. Three-dimensional accuracy of component placement used the preoperative CT plan compared to the 3-months postoperative CT scan to demonstrate accuracy of all autonomous resections to within 1.5 mm and/or 1.5 degrees. Surgical planning and execution to restore alignment along kinematic principles were used in 40 procedures and to achieve mechanical alignment in 75 procedures.

Conclusions

This FDA study of an active robotic approach for TKA represented the first multicenter trial and first US experience with this technology. Results demonstrated an excellent safety profile and high degree of accuracy. Advantages of this approach relate to standardization of the technique, multiple device options in the implant library, an excellent safety and accuracy profile, and consistency of results. Active robotics for TKA represents a viable and safe technique for primary TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borner M, Wiesel U, Ditzen W (2004) Clinical experience with ROBODOC and the Duracon Total Knee. In: Stiehl J, Konermann W, Haaker R (eds) Navigation and robotics in total joint and spine surgery. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 362–366

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF (2002) Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 9:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan J, Auld TS, Long WJ, Kreuzer S, Campanelli V, Liebelt R et al (2020) Active robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): initial experience with the TSolution One ® TKA system. Surg Technol Int 37:299–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren Y, Cao S, Wu J, Weng X, Feng B (2019) Efficacy and reliability of active robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty compared with conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J 95:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campanelli V, Lozano R, Akhlaghpour H, Brar AS, Maislin D, Nedopil AJ et al (2020) Implant placement accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: validation of a CT-based measurement technique. Quant Imaging Med Surg 10:475–484. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2020.01.02

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahure SA, Teo GM, Kissin YD, Stulberg BN, Kreuzer S, Long WJ (2021) Learning curve for active robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06452-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeon S-W, Kim K-I, Song SJ (2019) Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty does not improve long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. J Arthroplasty 34:1656–1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Song E-K, Seon J-K, Park S-J, Jung WB, Park H-W, Lee GW (2011) Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1400-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL (2013) Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho K-J, Seon J-K, Jang W-Y, Park C-G, Song E-K (2019) Robotic versus conventional primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years. Int Orthop 43:1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00264-018-4231-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liow MHL, Goh GS-H, Wong MK, Chin PL, Tay DK-J, Yeo S-J (2017) Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4076-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by THINK to conduct the IDE study to receive FDA approval of the TSolution One active robotic system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayson D. Zadzilka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Stulberg received research support from THINK as a PI for the IDE study. He is also a paid consultant/speaker for THINK and has stock or stock options in THINK. Mr. Zadzilka received research support from THINK as a research coordinator.

Ethical approval

The study received ethical approval from the Western Institutional Review Board.

Informed consent

The written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their participation in study activities.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stulberg, B.N., Zadzilka, J.D. Active robotic technologies for total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 2069–2075 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04044-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04044-2

Keywords

Navigation