Abstract
Introduction
Arthrofibrosis is a relatively frequent complication after total knee arthroplasty. Although stiffness after total hip arthroplasty (THA), because of formation of heterotopic ossification or other causes, is not uncommon, to the authors’ best knowledge, arthrofibrosis after THA has not been described. The aim of this study is to describe the arthrofibrosis of the hip after primary THA using an established clinical and histological classification of arthrofibrosis.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively examined all patients who were histologically confirmed to have arthrofibrosis after primary THA during revision surgery by examination of tissue samples in our clinic. Arthrofibrosis was diagnosed according to the histopathological SLIM-consensus classification, which defines seven different SLIM types of the periimplant synovial membrane. The SLIM type V determines the diagnosis of endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis.
Results
The study population consists of 66 patients who were revised due to arthrofibrosis after primary THA. All patients had a limitation in range of motion prior to revision with a mean flexion of 90° (range from 40 to 125), mean internal rotation of 10° (range from 0 to 40) and mean external rotation of 20° (range from 0 to 50). All patients had histological SLIM type V arthrofibrosis, corresponding to endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis. Histological examination revealed that seven patients (10.6%) had particle-induced and 59 patients (89.4%) had non-particle-induced arthrofibrosis.
Conclusion
This is the first description of endoprosthetic-associated arthrofibrosis after primary THA on the basis of a well-established histological classification. Our study results could enable new therapeutic and diagnostic opportunities in patients with such an arthrofibrosis. Surgeons should keep arthrofibrosis as a possible cause for stiffness and pain after primary THA in mind.
Level of evidence
Diagnostic study, Level of Evidence IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Where plausible reasons for disclosure of the data are given, the data used may be explained to promote transparency.
References
Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, Bade MJ, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2017) Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32(8):2604–2611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.005
Tibbo ME, Limberg AK, Salib CG, Ahmed AT, van Wijnen AJ, Berry DJ, Abdel MP (2019) Acquired idiopathic stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 101(14):1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01217
Lee S, Sakurai T, Ohsako M, Saura R, Hatta H, Atomi Y (2010) Tissue stiffness induced by prolonged immobilization of the rat knee joint and relevance of AGEs (pentosidine). Connect Tissue Res 51(6):467–477. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008201003686941
Kalson NS, Borthwick LA, Mann DA, Deehan DJ, Lewis P, Mann C, Mont MA, Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik S, Williams FM, Toms A, Argenson JN, Bellemans J, Bhave A, Furnes O, Gollwitzer H, Haddad FS, Hofmann S, Krenn V (2016) International consensus on the definition and classification of fibrosis of the knee joint. Bone Jt J. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37957
Cohen MS, Schimmel DR, Masuda K, Hastings H 2nd, Muehleman C (2007) Structural and biochemical evaluation of the elbow capsule after trauma. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(4):484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.018
Peacock EE Jr (1966) Some biochemical and biophysical aspects of joint stiffness: role of collagen synthesis as opposed to altered molecular bonding. Ann Surg 164(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-196607000-00001
Mayr HO, Fassbender FF, Prall WC, Haasters F, Bernstein A, Stoehr A (2019) Immunohistochemical examination in arthrofibrosis of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(3):383–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03115-9
Stephenson JJ, Quimbo RA, Gu T (2010) Knee-attributable medical costs and risk of re-surgery among patients utilizing non-surgical treatment options for knee arthrofibrosis in a managed care population. Curr Med Res Opin 26(5):1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007991003676479
Morawietz L, Classen RA, Schroder JH, Dynybil C, Perka C, Skwara A, Neidel J, Gehrke T, Frommelt L, Hansen T, Otto M, Barden B, Aigner T, Stiehl P, Schubert T, Meyer-Scholten C, Konig A, Strobel P, Rader CP, Kirschner S, Lintner F, Ruther W, Bos I, Hendrich C, Kriegsmann J, Krenn V (2006) Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane. J Clin Pathol 59(6):591–597. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.027458
Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boettner F, Zustin J, Kolbel B, Ruther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Soder S, Muller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017
Rutherford RW, Jennings JM, Levy DL, Parisi TJ, Martin JR, Dennis DA (2018) Revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis. J Arthroplast 33(7s):S177–S181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.037
Thompson R, Novikov D, Cizmic Z, Feng JE, Fideler K, Sayeed Z, Meftah M, Anoushiravani AA, Schwarzkopf R (2019) Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Orthop Clin North Am 50(3):269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.005
Krenn V, Waldstein W, Najm A, Perino G, Gaulke R (2018) Histopathological classification principles of rheumatic joint diseases: contribution of pathology to the diagnosis. Orthop 47(11):941–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3649-x
Michalik R, Rath B, Springorum HR, Luring C, Tingart M (2016) Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: causes, diagnosis and treatment. Orthop 45(5):386–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3256-7
Cohen JS, Gu A, Lopez NS, Park MS, Fehring KA, Sculco PK (2018) Efficacy of revision surgery for the treatment of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplast 33(9):3049–3055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.036
Nikolajsen L, Brandsborg B, Lucht U, Jensen TS, Kehlet H (2006) Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide questionnaire study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50(4):495–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00976.x
Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, Kremers WK, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ (2017) Procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction: trends over two decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(2):532–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3799-x
Usher KM, Zhu S, Mavropalias G, Carrino JA, Zhao J, Xu J (2019) Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic outlooks for arthrofibrosis. Bone Res 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-019-0047-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TG: supervision, writing, editing, analysis. LA: data collection, analysis, statistics, writing. PL: data collection, analysis, writing, proof reading. JS: analysis, writing, proof reading. VK: data collection, writing, editing, analysis. MC: supervision, writing, editing, analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript. Independent from the submitted manuscript, received royalties/payments of all authors are listed: Payments for presentations from Waldemar Link, Zimmer Biomet, Heraeus, and Ceramtec.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was performed and has following number: WF-080/20.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gehrke, T., Althaus, L., Linke, P. et al. Arthrofibrosis following primary total hip arthroplasty: a distinct clinical entity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 511–515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03922-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03922-z