Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthrofibrosis following primary total hip arthroplasty: a distinct clinical entity

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Arthrofibrosis is a relatively frequent complication after total knee arthroplasty. Although stiffness after total hip arthroplasty (THA), because of formation of heterotopic ossification or other causes, is not uncommon, to the authors’ best knowledge, arthrofibrosis after THA has not been described. The aim of this study is to describe the arthrofibrosis of the hip after primary THA using an established clinical and histological classification of arthrofibrosis.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively examined all patients who were histologically confirmed to have arthrofibrosis after primary THA during revision surgery by examination of tissue samples in our clinic. Arthrofibrosis was diagnosed according to the histopathological SLIM-consensus classification, which defines seven different SLIM types of the periimplant synovial membrane. The SLIM type V determines the diagnosis of endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis.

Results

The study population consists of 66 patients who were revised due to arthrofibrosis after primary THA. All patients had a limitation in range of motion prior to revision with a mean flexion of 90° (range from 40 to 125), mean internal rotation of 10° (range from 0 to 40) and mean external rotation of 20° (range from 0 to 50). All patients had histological SLIM type V arthrofibrosis, corresponding to endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis. Histological examination revealed that seven patients (10.6%) had particle-induced and 59 patients (89.4%) had non-particle-induced arthrofibrosis.

Conclusion

This is the first description of endoprosthetic-associated arthrofibrosis after primary THA on the basis of a well-established histological classification. Our study results could enable new therapeutic and diagnostic opportunities in patients with such an arthrofibrosis. Surgeons should keep arthrofibrosis as a possible cause for stiffness and pain after primary THA in mind.

Level of evidence

Diagnostic study, Level of Evidence IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Where plausible reasons for disclosure of the data are given, the data used may be explained to promote transparency.

References

  1. Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, Bade MJ, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2017) Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32(8):2604–2611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tibbo ME, Limberg AK, Salib CG, Ahmed AT, van Wijnen AJ, Berry DJ, Abdel MP (2019) Acquired idiopathic stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 101(14):1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee S, Sakurai T, Ohsako M, Saura R, Hatta H, Atomi Y (2010) Tissue stiffness induced by prolonged immobilization of the rat knee joint and relevance of AGEs (pentosidine). Connect Tissue Res 51(6):467–477. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008201003686941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalson NS, Borthwick LA, Mann DA, Deehan DJ, Lewis P, Mann C, Mont MA, Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik S, Williams FM, Toms A, Argenson JN, Bellemans J, Bhave A, Furnes O, Gollwitzer H, Haddad FS, Hofmann S, Krenn V (2016) International consensus on the definition and classification of fibrosis of the knee joint. Bone Jt J. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen MS, Schimmel DR, Masuda K, Hastings H 2nd, Muehleman C (2007) Structural and biochemical evaluation of the elbow capsule after trauma. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(4):484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peacock EE Jr (1966) Some biochemical and biophysical aspects of joint stiffness: role of collagen synthesis as opposed to altered molecular bonding. Ann Surg 164(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-196607000-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayr HO, Fassbender FF, Prall WC, Haasters F, Bernstein A, Stoehr A (2019) Immunohistochemical examination in arthrofibrosis of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(3):383–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03115-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stephenson JJ, Quimbo RA, Gu T (2010) Knee-attributable medical costs and risk of re-surgery among patients utilizing non-surgical treatment options for knee arthrofibrosis in a managed care population. Curr Med Res Opin 26(5):1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007991003676479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morawietz L, Classen RA, Schroder JH, Dynybil C, Perka C, Skwara A, Neidel J, Gehrke T, Frommelt L, Hansen T, Otto M, Barden B, Aigner T, Stiehl P, Schubert T, Meyer-Scholten C, Konig A, Strobel P, Rader CP, Kirschner S, Lintner F, Ruther W, Bos I, Hendrich C, Kriegsmann J, Krenn V (2006) Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane. J Clin Pathol 59(6):591–597. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.027458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boettner F, Zustin J, Kolbel B, Ruther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Soder S, Muller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutherford RW, Jennings JM, Levy DL, Parisi TJ, Martin JR, Dennis DA (2018) Revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis. J Arthroplast 33(7s):S177–S181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson R, Novikov D, Cizmic Z, Feng JE, Fideler K, Sayeed Z, Meftah M, Anoushiravani AA, Schwarzkopf R (2019) Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Orthop Clin North Am 50(3):269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krenn V, Waldstein W, Najm A, Perino G, Gaulke R (2018) Histopathological classification principles of rheumatic joint diseases: contribution of pathology to the diagnosis. Orthop 47(11):941–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3649-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalik R, Rath B, Springorum HR, Luring C, Tingart M (2016) Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: causes, diagnosis and treatment. Orthop 45(5):386–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3256-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen JS, Gu A, Lopez NS, Park MS, Fehring KA, Sculco PK (2018) Efficacy of revision surgery for the treatment of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplast 33(9):3049–3055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolajsen L, Brandsborg B, Lucht U, Jensen TS, Kehlet H (2006) Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide questionnaire study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50(4):495–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00976.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, Kremers WK, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ (2017) Procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction: trends over two decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(2):532–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3799-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Usher KM, Zhu S, Mavropalias G, Carrino JA, Zhao J, Xu J (2019) Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic outlooks for arthrofibrosis. Bone Res 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-019-0047-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TG: supervision, writing, editing, analysis. LA: data collection, analysis, statistics, writing. PL: data collection, analysis, writing, proof reading. JS: analysis, writing, proof reading. VK: data collection, writing, editing, analysis. MC: supervision, writing, editing, analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Citak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript. Independent from the submitted manuscript, received royalties/payments of all authors are listed: Payments for presentations from Waldemar Link, Zimmer Biomet, Heraeus, and Ceramtec.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was performed and has following number: WF-080/20.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gehrke, T., Althaus, L., Linke, P. et al. Arthrofibrosis following primary total hip arthroplasty: a distinct clinical entity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 511–515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03922-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03922-z

Keywords

Navigation