Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A novel radiological classification system of the distal femur

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In our previous studies, we were able to identify anatomical differences as a predictor for aseptic loosening following primary and revision surgery with the use of rotating hinge prosthesis. This study was performed to answer following question: can a novel radiological classification system of the distal femur be identified?

Materials and methods

A total of 200 patients who received standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the knee joint were included in this study. On AP radiographs, we measured the distance between inner diameter of the femur at 20 cm proximally from the knee and at a point 2 cm proximally from the adductor tubercle. The ratio of the inner diameter of the femoral canal at 20 cm proximal of knee joint to the inner diameter of medullary canal at 2 cm proximal of adductor tubercle was used as a novel index ratio. Two observers blindly and independently reviewed the anteroposterior radiographs twice.

Results

Three groups of anatomical classification can be constructed for each sex according to the 25th and 75th percentiles. A higher distribution of Type C was found in female patients. The median intra-observer reliability for rater 1 was 0.995 (IQR 0.994–0.997). We had also a high inter-observer reliability with ICC of 0.997 (95% CI 0.996–0.998).

Conclusions

The novel classification presents three different types of the knee joint for male and female patients. Type C has a wider inner diaphyseal diameter compared to Type A with a narrow inner diaphyseal diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials are available.

References

  1. Rodriguez-Merchan EC (2019) Total knee arthroplasty using hinge joints: Indications and results. EFORT Open Rev 4(4):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180056

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdulkarim A, Keane A, Hu SY, Glen L, Murphy DJ (2019) Rotating-hinge knee prosthesis as a viable option in primary surgery: literature review & meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(7):1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kouk S, Rathod PA, Maheshwari AV, Deshmukh AJ (2018) Rotating hinge prosthesis for complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma 9(1):29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik SI, Graichen H, Haddad FS (2015) Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 97-B(2):147–149. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang A, Hochberg M, Song J, Dunlop D, Chmiel JS, Nevitt M, Hayes K, Eaton C, Bathon J, Jackson R, Kwoh CK, Sharma L (2010) Frequency of varus and valgus thrust and factors associated with thrust presence in persons with or at higher risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 62(5):1403–1411. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, Feng JC, Zheng WX, Sun YF, Fu YW, Li YQ (2009) Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. Knee 16(5):341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.12.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillespie RJ, Levine A, Fitzgerald SJ, Kolaczko J, DeMaio M, Marcus RE, Cooperman DR (2011) Gender differences in the anatomy of the distal femur. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93(3):357–363. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.24708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hitt K, Shurman JR II, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman T, Mont MA (2003) Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 4):115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walensky NA (1965) A study of anterior femoral curvature in man. Anat Rec 151:559–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091510406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ (2006) Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee 13(1):12–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2005.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Urabe K, Mahoney OM, Mabuchi K, Itoman M (2008) Morphologic differences of the distal femur between Caucasian and Japanese women. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 16(3):312–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Urabe K, Miura H, Kuwano T, Matsuda S, Nagamine R, Sakai S, Masuda K, Iwamoto Y (2003) Comparison between the shape of resected femoral sections and femoral prostheses used in total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients: simulation using three-dimensional computed tomography. J Knee Surg 16(1):27–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, Tang T, Rubash HE, Li G (2011) Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplasty 26(1):124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Everhart JS, Chaudhari AM, Flanigan DC (2016) Creation of a simple distal femur morphology classification system. J Orthop Res 34(6):924–931. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levent A, Suero EM, Gehrke TMC (2020) Risk factors for aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty with a rotating hinge implant. A case-control study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Levent A, Suero EM, Godarzi BI, Gehrke T, Citak M (2021) Risk factors for aseptic loosening in complex revision total knee arthroplasty using rotating hinge implants. Int Orthop 45(1):125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koh YG, Nam JH, Chung HS, Kim HJ, Lee HY, Kang KT (2020) Gender differences exist in rotational anatomy of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees using MRI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(9):2990–2997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05730-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmutz B, Kmiec S Jr, Wullschleger ME, Altmann M, Schuetz M (2017) 3D Computer graphical anatomy study of the femur: a basis for a new nail design. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2621-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mustafa Citak and Ali Levent contributed equally to the writing of this manuscript

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstrasse 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany

    Mustafa Citak, Ali Levent, Kristof Rademacher, Sophia-Marlene Busch & Thorsten Gehrke

  2. Department of Traumatology, University Hospital München, München, Deutschland

    Eduardo M. Suero

Authors
  1. Mustafa Citak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Levent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eduardo M. Suero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristof Rademacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sophia-Marlene Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thorsten Gehrke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Citak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript. Independent from the submitted manuscript, received royalties/payments of all authors are listed: payments for presentations from Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany, Zimmer Biomet Inc., Warsaw, USA. Heraeus, Ceramtec Co.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was performed and has following number: WF-086/20.

Consent to participate

Consent to participate is given.

Consent to publish

Consent to publish is given.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Citak, M., Levent, A., Suero, E.M. et al. A novel radiological classification system of the distal femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 315–322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03828-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03828-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation