Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-term posterior C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation without fusion to treat type II odontoid fracture among people under 60 years

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Posterior C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation is a reliable technique used in treatment of type II odontoid fracture. However, the loss of cervical range of rotation motion (RORM) was inevitable. There were few studies focusing on the influence of short-term C1–C2 fixation with nonfusion technique to preserve cervical function in patients younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to compare cervical RORM which was measured by an improved goniometer, and the clinical outcomes between short-term and long-term C1–C2 fixation techniques in the treatment of Grauer type 2B and 2C odontoid fracture.

Materials and methods

This study represents a retrospective analysis, including patients who underwent primary C1–C2 fixation surgery. These patients were divided into short-term and long-term groups based on whether underwent a fixation removal operation. The clinical results were collected and compared between the two groups. Independent T test and Chi-square analyses were used to identify significant differences between the two groups and dependent T test was used within each group. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

Results

There were no severe postoperative complications, and all 60 patients achieved spinal stabilization after primary surgery. The mean rotation angle in the short-term group at last follow-up time was 138.39 ± 21.06°, which was better than 83.59 ± 13.06° in the long-term group (p < .05). The same statistical difference was observed in flexion–extension angle, which was 71.11 ± 18.73° in short-term group and 53.34 ± 18.23° in long-term group. The mean NDI score in short-term group at last follow-up time was 1.23 ± 0.86 and better than 8.24 ± 3.17 in long-term group. However, the VAS score in short-term group was 1.82 ± 0.54 which was worse compared to 0.64 ± 0.29 in long-term group.

Conclusions

The results demonstrated that primary C1–C2 fixation with nonfusion technique could support satisfactory clinical effects. In addition, the removal of instruments after bony fusion could improve the function of cervical movement significantly in patients under 60 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are fully available without restriction.

Abbreviations

ACSF:

Anterior cannulated screws fixation

RORM:

Range of rotation motion

NDI:

Neck disability index

VAS:

Visual analog scale

CT:

Computer tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

AAD:

Atlantoaxial dislocation

References

  1. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT (1974) Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 56(8):1663–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Subach BR, Morone MA, Haid RW Jr, McLaughlin MR, Rodts GR, Comey CH (1999) Management of acute odontoid fractures with single-screw anterior fixation. Neurosurgery 45(4):812–819 ((discussion 819-820))

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Apfelbaum RI, Lonser RR, Veres R, Casey A (2000) Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures. J Neurosurg 93(2 Suppl):227–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ochoa G (2005) Surgical management of odontoid fractures. Injury 36(Suppl 2):B54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y, Zhang G, Yi P, Li Z, Wei H, Yang F (2003) Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine 28(9):888–895. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000058719.48596.CC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koller H, Resch H, Acosta F, Zenner J, Schwaiger R, Tauber M, Forstner R, Lederer S, Auffarth A, Hitzl W (2010) Assessment of two measurement techniques of cervical spine and C1–C2 rotation in the outcome research of axis fractures: a morphometrical analysis using dynamic computed tomography scanning. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(3):286–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c911a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersson S, Rodrigues M, Olerud C (2000) Odontoid fractures: high complication rate associated with anterior screw fixation in the elderly. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 9(1):56–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazur MD, Mumert ML, Bisson EF, Schmidt MH (2011) Avoiding pitfalls in anterior screw fixation for type II odontoid fractures. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen ZD, Wu J, Lu CW, Zeng WR, Huang ZZ, Lin B (2020) C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation for pediatric atlantoaxial dislocation: initial results and long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 40(2):65–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Menger RP, Storey CM, Nixon MK, Haydel J, Nanda A, Sin A (2015) Placement of C1 pedicle screws using minimal exposure: radiographic, clinical, and literature validation. Int J Spine Surg 9:43. https://doi.org/10.14444/2043

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin JM, Hipp JA, Reitman CA (2013) C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis. Spine J 13(11):1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zarro CM, Ludwig SC, Hsieh AH, Seal CN, Gelb DE (2013) Biomechanical comparison of the pullout strengths of C1 lateral mass screws and C1 posterior arch screws. Spine J 13(12):1892–1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fensky F, Kueny RA, Sellenschloh K, Puschel K, Morlock MM, Rueger JM, Lehmann W, Huber G, Hansen-Algenstaedt N (2014) Biomechanical advantage of C1 pedicle screws over C1 lateral mass screws: a cadaveric study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23(4):724–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3143-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Theologis AA, Deviren V, Tay B (2017) Temporary fusionless posterior occipitocervical fixation for a proximal junctional type II odontoid fracture after previous C2-pelvis fusion: case report, description of a new surgical technique, and review of the literature. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 26(Suppl 1):243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5093-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo Q, Deng Y, Wang J, Wang L, Lu X, Guo X, Ni B (2016) Comparison of clinical outcomes of posterior C1–C2 temporary fixation without fusion and C1–C2 fusion for fresh odontoid fractures. Neurosurgery 78(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan S, Wei B, Tian Y, Yan J, Xu W, Wang L, Liu X (2018) Posterior temporary C1–2 fixation for 3-part fractures of the axis (odontoid dens and Hangman fractures). Medicine 97(48):e12957. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012957

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong D, Lee G, Liao Y, Wang Q (2017) Is it feasible to treat odontoid fractures via primary posterior reduction and fixation without fusion? World Neurosurg 106:693–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ni B, Guo Q, Lu X, Xie N, Wang L, Guo X, Chen F (2015) Posterior reduction and temporary fixation for odontoid fracture: a salvage maneuver to anterior screw fixation. Spine 40(3):E168-174. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaesmacher J, Schweizer C, Valentinitsch A, Baum T, Rienmuller A, Meyer B, Kirschke JS, Ryang YM (2017) Osteoporosis is the most important risk factor for odontoid fractures in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 32(7):1582–1588. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Molinari RW, Dahl J, Gruhn WL, Molinari WJ (2013) Functional outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and fracture healing in 26 consecutive geriatric odontoid fracture patients treated with posterior fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(3):119–126. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31823e99e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Faure A, Graillon T, Pesenti S, Tropiano P, Blondel B, Fuentes S (2017) Trends in the surgical management of odontoid fractures in patients above 75 years of age: retrospective study of 70 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(8):1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Butler JS, Dolan RT, Burbridge M, Hurson CJ, O’Byrne JM, McCormack D, Synnott K, Poynton AR (2010) The long-term functional outcome of type II odontoid fractures managed non-operatively. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19(10):1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1391-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Sarahrudi K, Kovar F, Vekszler G, Vecsei V, Gaebler C (2007) Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures using a halothoracic vest. Neurosurgery 61(3):522–529. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000290898.15567.21 ((discussion 529-530))

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14(7):409–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giles LG, Muller R (2003) Chronic spinal pain: a randomized clinical trial comparing medication, acupuncture, and spinal manipulation. Spine 28(14):1490–1502 ((discussion 1502-1493))

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There is no conflict of interest among all the authors.

Funding

This work was supported by Grants from Capital Characteristic Clinical project of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (https://www.bjkw.gov.cn/n8785584/index.html) (Grant no. Z161100000516009). No individuals employed or contracted by the funders played any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MsT and PY conceived and designed the study. YS, LG, and XsT collected the data. JpS analyzed the data. JpS and YlW wrote the paper. FY and XsT reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingsheng Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There were no competing interests existing among all the authors and institutions in our study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of China–Japan Friendship Hospital (belongs to National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China) and was waived patients consent because of the nature of retrospective study.

Consent for publication

We have obtained consent to publish to report individual patient data (images).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Yi, P., Wang, Y. et al. Short-term posterior C1–C2 pedicle screw fixation without fusion to treat type II odontoid fracture among people under 60 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 543–551 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03641-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03641-x

Keywords

Navigation