Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does preoperative hemodynamic preconditioning improve morbidity and mortality after traumatic hip fracture in geriatric patients? A retrospective cohort study

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Dehydration is a major problem in the older population with traumatic hip fractures (THF). A preoperative hemodynamic preconditioning (PHP) protocol may help in achieving hemodynamic stability to ensure adequate perfusion and oxygenation using only clinical parameters to assess cardiovascular performance.

Materials and methods

A single-centre retrospective study in geriatric trauma patients was conducted in a Level 1 Trauma Centre in Switzerland. Patients over the age of 70 with THFs and with Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality (P-POSSUM) scores ≥ 5% who underwent surgical treatment between February 2015 and October 2017 were included. It was hypothesized that patients whose hemodynamic stability was optimised before surgery would have fewer complications and reduced mortality postoperatively. Primary outcomes were complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (HLOS) and place of discharge.

Results

100 patients were included in the PHP group and 79 patients were included in the non-PHP group. The median age was 86.5 (82–90) in the PHP group and 86 (82–90) in the non-PHP group. Patients who had been treated according to the PHP protocol showed a significant reduction in mortality at 30 days (p = 0.02). The PHP group showed an 8.1 and 3.5% reduced mortality at 90 days and at 1 year, respectively. The PHP group showed an 11.7% reduction of patients with complicated courses. No significant differences were seen in HLOS and discharge disposition.

Conclusions

The PHP group showed a significant reduction in short-term mortality, a reduction in long-term mortality, and a reduction in the number of patients with complicated courses. The PHP protocol is a safe, strictly regulated, non-invasive fluid resuscitation protocol for the optimization of geriatric patients with a THF that requires minimal effort.

Level of evidence

Level III, therapeutic

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellis G, Langhorne P (2004) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull 71:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldh033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Luise C, Brimacombe M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT (2008) Comorbidity and mortality following hip fracture: a population-based cohort study. Aging Clin Exp Res 20(5):412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20(10):1633–1650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saltzherr TP BH, Bakker RH, Go PM (2006) Proximal femur fractures in the elderly in The Netherlands during the period 1991–2004: incidence, mortality, length of hospital stay and an estimate of the care capacity needed in the future. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

  5. Bennett JA, Thomas V, Riegel B (2004) Unrecognized chronic dehydration in older adults: examining prevalence rate and risk factors. J Gerontol Nurs 30(11):22–28 (quiz 52-23)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nichol C, Wilson H, Webster S (2008) Elderly care medicine, 7th edn. Blackwell, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brasel KJ, Guse C, Gentilello LM, Nirula R (2007) Heart rate: is it truly a vital sign? J Trauma 62(4):812–817. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31803245a1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(4):344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85(9):1217–1220. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marik PE (2009) Techniques for assessment of intravascular volume in critically ill patients. J Intensive Care Med 24(5):329–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066609340640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang X, Du B (2014) Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 18(6):650. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0650-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen. https://www2.aofoundation.org/wps/portal/surgery?showPage=diagnosis&bone=Femur&segment=Proximal. Accessed August 20, 2019

  13. CDC Diseases & Conditions. https://www.cdc.gov/. Accessed July 12, 2019 2019

  14. ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines. https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines. Accessed July 14, 2019 2019

  15. WHO Health topics. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/topics. Accessed July 13, 2019 2019

  16. KDIGO KDIGO Guidelines. https://kdigo.org/guidelines/. Accessed July 14, 2019 2019

  17. EPUAP pressure ulcer treatment & prevention. EPUAP. https://www.epuap.org/pu-guidelines/. Accesssed July 14, 2019 2019

  18. Rocos B, Whitehouse MR, Kelly MB (2017) Resuscitation in hip fractures: a systematic review. BMJ Open 7(4):e015906. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015906

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Grigoryan KV, Javedan H, Rudolph JL (2014) Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 28(3):e49–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a5a045

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jonsson MH, Bentzer P, Turkiewicz A, Hommel A (2018) Accuracy of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity score and the Nottingham risk score in hip fracture patients in Sweden—A prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.Q.K., P.C.R.V., F.J.P.B., and B.P. participated in study design. J.Q.K. and P.C.R.V. participated in data collection. J.Q.K. and F.J.P.B participated in statistical analysis. J.Q.K., P.C.R.V., F.J.P.B., and F.J.G.W. participated in article drafting. B.P., D.V., B.C.L., R.B., and F.J.P.B. participated in critical revision of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. P. Beeres.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J. Q. Kusen, P. C. R. van der Vet, B.C. Link, B. Poblete, D. van der Velde, R. H. Babst, and F. J. P. Beeres declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kusen, J.Q., van der Vet, P.C.R., Wijdicks, F.J.G. et al. Does preoperative hemodynamic preconditioning improve morbidity and mortality after traumatic hip fracture in geriatric patients? A retrospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 1491–1497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03601-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03601-5

Keywords

Navigation