Abstract
Background
To date, only limited literature exists regarding revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the direct anterior approach (DAA). However, as the popularity of the DAA for primary surgery is increasing, surgeons will be confronted with the challenge of performing revision surgery through the DAA. The aim of this study was to review the potential of the DAA in the revision setting and to report the clinical results, radiologic outcomes and complication rates of 63 patients undergoing revision THA through the DAA.
Methods
From 01/2009 to 08/2017, 63 patients underwent revision THA through the DAA. Depending on the performed procedure, patients were separated into 4 groups: liner and head exchange (21 patients), revision of the acetabular cup (26 patients), revision of the femoral stem (13 patients) or revision of both components (3 patients). Postoperative complications as well as the clinical and radiological outcome were assessed retrospectively.
Results
At a mean follow-up of 18 months, the overall complication and re-operation rates were 14.3% and 12.7%, respectively. Specifically, the complication and re-operation rates were 14.2% and 9.5% after liner and head exchange, 15.4% after revision of the acetabular cup, 15.3% after revision of the femoral stem and 0% after revision of both components. The mean postoperative HHS at 1 year postoperatively was 91 (range 74–100).
Conclusion
The DAA offers appropriate exposure for exchange of mobile liners and acetabular cup revision. In selected cases with appropriate stem design, femoral stem revision through the DAA is feasible. However, surgeons should be aware of the technical difficulties related to femoral revision and be prepared to extend the approach distally or perform a trochanteric osteotomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 86-A(5):963–974
Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, Mont MA (2012) Hip arthroplasty. Lancet 380(9855):1768–1777
Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(1):128–133
Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(7):1487–1497
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 89(4):780–785
Fehring TK, Odum SM, Fehring K, Springer BD, Griffin WL, Dennos AC (2010) Mortality following revision joint arthroplasty: is age a factor? Orthopedics 33(10):715
Bozic KJ, Katz P, Cisternas M, Ono L, Ries MD, Showstack J (2005) Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(3):570–576
Bender B, Nogler M, Hozack WJ (2009) Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 40(3):321–328
Rachbauer F, Kain MS, Leunig M (2009) The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 40(3):311–320
Lovell TP (2008) Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty 23(7 Suppl):64–68
Oinuma K, Eingartner C, Saito Y, Shiratsuchi H (2007) Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19(3):310–326
Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, Zatorski LE, Huo MH, Keggi KJ (2003) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 85A(Suppl 4):39–48
Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP (2013) Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28(9):1634–1638
Antoniadis A, Dimitriou D, Flury A, Wiedmer G, Hasler J, Helmy N (2018) Is direct anterior approach a credible option for severely obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? A matched-control, retrospective, Clinical Study. J Arthroplasty. 33(8):2535–2540
Rodriguez JA, Deshmukh AJ, Rathod PA, Greiz ML, Deshmane PP, Hepinstall MS et al (2014) Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(2):455–463
Grob K, Monahan R, Gilbey H, Yap F, Filgueira L, Kuster M (2015) Distal extension of the direct anterior approach to the hip poses risk to neurovascular structures: an anatomical study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(2):126–132
Nogler MM, Thaler MR (2017) The direct anterior approach for hip revision: accessing the entire femoral diaphysis without endangering the nerve supply. J Arthroplasty 32(2):510–514
Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski LE, Keggi KJ (2004) Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 86-A(Suppl 2):91–97
Mast NH, Laude F (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the Hueter interval. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(Suppl 2):143–148
Michel JP, Klopfenstein C, Hoffmeyer P, Stern R, Grab B (2002) Hip fracture surgery: is the pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score a predictor of functional outcome? Aging Clin Exp Res 14(5):389–394
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994
Fessy MH, N'Diaye A, Carret JP, Fischer LP (1999) Locating the center of rotation of the hip. Surg Radiol Anat 21(4):247–250
Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64(9):1295–1306
Patil S, Grigoris P, Shaw-Dunn J, Reece AT (2007) Innervation of vastus lateralis muscle. Clin Anat 20(5):556–559
Tyler D, Goldberg ATB, Ryan M (2016) Femoral component revisions in direct anterior approach. EC Orthop 4(3):518–526
Manrique J, Chen AF, Heller S, Hozack WJ (2014) Direct anterior approach for revision total hip arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 2(10):100
Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, Salai M, Amar E (2013) Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(11):1595–1600
Kanda A, Kaneko K, Obayashi O, Mogami A, Morohashi I (2018) Preservation of the articular capsule and short lateral rotator in direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(6):1111–1116
Moretti VM, Post ZD (2017) Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Indian journal of orthopaedics 51(4):368–376
Horsthemke MD, Koenig C, Gosheger G, Hardes J, Hoell S (2018) The minimalinvasive direct anterior approach in aseptic cup revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(1):121–126
Kerboull L (2015) Selecting the surgical approach for revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(1 Suppl):S171–S178
Nogler M, Mayr E, Krismer M (2012) The direct anterior approach to the hip revision. Oper Orthop Traumatol 24(2):153–164
Pallaver A, Zwicky L, Bolliger L, Bosebeck H, Manzoni I, Schadelin S et al (2018) Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(11):1609–1616
Jafari SM, Coyle C, Mortazavi SM, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J (2010) Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(8):2046–2051
Badarudeen S, Shu AC, Ong KL, Baykal D, Lau E, Malkani AL (2017) Complications after revision total hip arthroplasty in the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 32(6):1954–1958
Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA et al (2003) Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(1):27–32
Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Greidanus NV, Bohm ER, Petrak MJ et al (2012) The Frank Stinchfield Award: dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):351–356
Dimitriou D, Liow MH, Tsai TY, Leone WA, Li G, Kwon YM (2016) Early outcomes of revision surgery for taper corrosion of dual taper total hip arthroplasty in 187 patients. J Arthroplasty 31(7):1549–1554
Suh KT, Roh HL, Moon KP, Shin JK, Lee JS (2008) Posterior approach with posterior soft tissue repair in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23(8):1197–1203
Hummel MT, Malkani AL, Yakkanti MR, Baker DL (2009) Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair. J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):73–76
Cogan A, Klouche S, Mamoudy P, Sariali E (2011) Total hip arthroplasty dislocation rate following isolated cup revision using Hueter's direct anterior approach on a fracture table. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(5):501–505
Liow MH, Dimitriou D, Tsai TY, Kwon YM (2016) Preoperative risk factors associated with poor outcomes of revision surgery for “pseudotumors” in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(12):2835–2842
Funding
There is no external funding source, or the funding source did not play a role in the investigation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Naeder Helmy has Royalties from Medacta International (Switzerland) and is Speaker for Mathys Ltd Bettlach (Switzerland) and Medacta International (Switzerland).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasler, J., Flury, A., Dimitriou, D. et al. Is revision total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach feasible?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140, 1125–1132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03469-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03469-5