Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to determine the variability of femoral tunnel positions applying two different lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) techniques, guiding on the tactile identification (1) of the lateral epicondyle (Lemaire procedure) and (2) of the Kaplan fibre attachments on the distal femur (MacIntosh procedure) and to analyse whether one of these procedures is more suitable for reliable femoral tunnel positioning in LET procedures.
Materials and methods
Two experienced knee surgeons determined femoral tunnel positions in ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens according to the modified Lemaire and MacIntosh techniques. Tunnel positions were measured on true lateral radiographs as absolute distances from the posterior cortex line (anterior–posterior direction) and from a perpendicular line intersecting the contact of the posterior femoral condyle (proximal–distal direction), respectively. Further, tunnel positions were measured relatively to the femur height. An independent F test was used to compare variances between Lemaire and MacIntosh tunnel positions and between anterior–posterior and proximal–distal directions.
Results
The mean Lemaire and MacIntosh positions were found 2.7 ± 5.5 mm and 3.6 ± 3.4 mm anterior to the posterior cortex line, and 7.5 ± 5.0 mm and 17.3 ± 6.9 mm proximal to the perpendicular line intersecting the contact of the posterior femoral condyle, respectively. Mean Lemaire and MacIntosh positions, relative to the femur height, were found at 8.8% and 10.9% (anterior–posterior) and 22.2% and 50.8% (proximal–distal), respectively. Variability in tunnel positioning was observed for both techniques, showing no significant differences in the variance (p > 0.05) and partially overlapping tunnel positions of both techniques. The overall variance of tunnel positions, however, was significantly greater in proximal–distal than in anterior–posterior direction (F = 2.673, p < 0.038).
Conclusions
Femoral tunnel positions in LET procedures have a high degree of variability and inaccuracy. Palpating anatomic landmarks appears to be insufficient to generate reproducible tunnel positions. Radiographic landmarks may enable more reproducible identification of isometric femoral tunnel positions and reduce malpositioning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Trojani C et al (2012) Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1565–1570
Sonnery-Cottet B et al (2017) Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament—deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol 18(2):91–106
Guzzini M et al (2016) Extra-articular tenodesis combined with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in acute anterior cruciate ligament tear in elite female football players. Int Orthop 40(10):2091–2096
Monaco E et al (2007) Double bundle or single bundle plus extraarticular tenodesis in ACL reconstruction? A CAOS study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(10):1168–1174
Lerat JL et al (1998) The results after 10-16 years of the treatment of chronic anterior laxity of the knee using reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar tendon graft combined with an external extra-articular reconstruction. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84(8):712–727
Saragaglia D, Pison A, Refaie R (2013) Lateral tenodesis combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a unique semitendinosus and gracilis transplant. Int Orthop 37(8):1575–1581
Vadala AP et al (2013) An extra-articular procedure improves the clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings in female athletes. Int Orthop 37(2):187–192
Lemaire M, Combelles F (1980) Plastic repair with fascia lata for old tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 66(8):523–525
Ireland J, Trickey EL (1980) Macintosh tenodesis for anterolateral instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62(3):340–345
Slette EL et al (2016) Biomechanical results of lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 32(12):2592–2611
Kittl C et al (2018) Biomechanics of the anterolateral structures of the knee. Clin Sports Med 37(1):21–31
Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147:45–50
Amirault JD et al (1988) Chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Long-term results of MacIntosh’s lateral substitution reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70(4):622–624
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33(2):363–374
Kittl C et al (2015) Length change patterns in the lateral extra-articular structures of the knee and related reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 43(2):354–362
Draganich LF et al (1990) An in vitro study of an intraarticular and extraarticular reconstruction in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 18(3):262–266
Geeslin AG et al (2018) Anterolateral knee extra-articular stabilizers: a robotic sectioning study of the anterolateral ligament and distal iliotibial band Kaplan fibers. Am J Sports Med 46(6):1352–1361
Inderhaug E et al (2017) The effects of anterolateral tenodesis on tibiofemoral contact pressures and kinematics. Am J Sports Med 45(13):3081–3088
Inderhaug E et al (2018) Effect of anterolateral complex sectioning and tenodesis on patellar kinematics and patellofemoral joint contact pressures. Am J Sports Med 46(12):2922–2928
Dodds AL et al (2011) Extra-articular techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(11):1440–1448
Sidles JA et al (1988) Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res 6(4):593–610
Koenen P et al (2018) Intraoperative fluoroscopy during MPFL reconstruction improves the accuracy of the femoral tunnel position. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3547–3552
Sven S et al (2015) Variability of tunnel positioning in fluoroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(8):2269–2277
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaecker, V., Shafizadeh, S., Naendrup, JH. et al. Tactile techniques are associated with a high variability of tunnel positions in lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140, 495–501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03331-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03331-8