Abstract
Introduction
Recently, a new classification system for sternal fractures has been published in the Journal of Orthopedic trauma by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) foundation and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA). The aim of this study was to evaluate inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures.
Materials and methods
Twenty multidetector computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with sternal fractures were classified independently by six senior and six junior orthopedic trauma surgeons of two level-1 trauma centers. Assessment was done on two occasions with an interval of 6 weeks. The kappa value was calculated to determine variability.
Results
The inter-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures showed fair-to-moderate agreement (kappa = 0.364). There was no significant difference between junior and senior surgeons. Analyses of the separate components of the classification demonstrated that agreement was lowest for classifying fracture type within the sternal body (kappa = 0.319) followed by manubrium (kappa = 0.525). The intra-observer variability showed moderate agreement with a mean kappa of 0.414.
Conclusion
The inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures shows fair-to-moderate agreement. The overall performance of the classification might be improved with minor modifications.
Level of evidence
Diagnostic cross-sectional study (level I).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhao Y, Yang Y, Gao Z et al (2017) Treatment of traumatic sternal fractures with titanium plate internal fixation: a retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg 12:22
Klei DS, de Jong MB, Öner FC, Leenen LPH, van Wessem KJP (2019) Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures—a systematic review. Int Orthop 43(6):1455–1464
Meinberg EG, Agel J, Karam MD et al (2018) Introduction: fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018: international comprehensive classification of fractures and dislocations committee. J Orthop Trauma 32(Suppl 1):S1–S10
Bujang MA, Baharum N (2017) Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for Cohen’s kappa. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health 14(2):e12267
Altaye M, Donner A, Eliasziw M (2001) A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic. Stat Med 20:2479–2488
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Duraikannu C, Noronha OV, Sundarrajan P (2016) MDCT evaluation of sternal variations: pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 26(2):185–194
Kim EY, Yang HJ, Sung YM, Hwang KH, Kim JH, Kim HS (2012) Sternal fracture in the emergency department: diagnostic value of multidetector CT with sagittal and coronal reconstruction images. Eur J Radiol 81(5):e708–e711
Petrović K, Turkalj I, Stojanović S, Vucaj-Cirilović V, Nikolić O, Stojiljković D (2013) Blunt trauma of bone structures of the chest–computed tomography vs multidetector computed tomography. Vojnosanit Pregl 70(8):757–761
Acknowledgements
The sternal fracture observer study group: R. Leeuwen, MD; J. Commandeur, MD—Luzerner Kantonsspital, Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Spitalstrasse 16, 6000 Luzern, Switzerland. C. Keiser, MD; L. Peterer, MD; B. Zimmerman, MD; M. Tryzna, MD—Kantonsspital Graubünden, Department of Trauma Surgery, Loëstrasse 170, 7000 Chur, Switzerland.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van de Wall, B.J.M., Beeres, F.J.P., Link, B. et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures: a validation study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140, 735–739 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03289-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03289-2