Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the use of evaporative coolants and ice packs for the management of preoperative edema and pain in ankle fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The use of evaporative coolants in the management of acute musculoskeletal injury has received increasing attention recently. However, its efficacy compared with conventional cryotherapy in treating injured human subjects remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of evaporative coolants with that of ice packs in preoperative management of edema and pain in patients with an ankle fracture.

Material and methods

Sixty-three patients in need of surgical treatment for ankle fracture were randomly assigned to either an evaporative coolant group or an ice pack group. Both treatments were applied for 5 days after injury and outcomes were measured daily. The primary outcome was a reduction in edema as measured by the figure-of-eight-20 method and the secondary outcome was measured by visual analog scale (VAS) for pain.

Results

Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures showed no significant group effect and no significant group-by-time interaction in terms of reduction of edema and VAS score for pain between two groups. No adverse effects were reported in either group.

Conclusion

Evaporative coolants exhibited comparable efficacy to ice packs in preoperative cryotherapy of ankle fractures without adverse effects. While evaporative coolants are more expensive than ice packs, they can present a viable option for cryotherapy.

Level of evidence

Level I, prospective randomized study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Airaksinen OV, Kyrklund N, Latvala K, Kouri JP, Gronblad M, Kolari P (2003) Efficacy of cold gel for soft tissue injuries: a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Am J Sports Med 31:680–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bleakley C, McDonough S, MacAuley D (2004) The use of ice in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 32:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bleakley CM, McDonough SM, MacAuley DC, Bjordal J (2006) Cryotherapy for acute ankle sprains: a randomised controlled study of two different icing protocols. Br J Sports Med 40:700–705 (discussion 705)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright JG, Araki CT, Belkin M, Hobson RW 2nd (1989) Postischemic hypothermia diminishes skeletal muscle reperfusion edema. J Surg Res 47:389–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McMaster WC, Liddle S (1980) Cryotherapy influence on posttraumatic limb edema. Clin Orthop Relat Res 150:283–287

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meeusen R, Lievens P (1986) The use of cryotherapy in sports injuries. Sports Med 3:398–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Best TM (1997) Soft-tissue injuries and muscle tears. Clin Sports Med 16:419–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Swenson C, Sward L, Karlsson J (1996) Cryotherapy in sports medicine. Scand J Med Sci Sports 6:193–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. VanGelder CM, Sheridan RL (1999) Freezing soft tissue injury from propane gas. J Trauma 46:355–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Drez D, Faust DC, Evans JP (1981) Cryotherapy and nerve palsy. Am J Sports Med 9:256–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rohner-Spengler M, Mannion AF, Babst R (2007) Reliability and minimal detectable change for the figure-of-eight-20 method of, measurement of ankle edema. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlsson AM (1983) Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16:87–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz J, Melzack R (1999) Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am 79:231–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mumith A, Pavlou P, Barrett M, Thurston B, Garrett S (2015) Enhancing postoperative rehabilitation following knee arthroplasty using a new cryotherapy product: a prospective study. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 6:316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duan F, Ward CA (2005) Surface excess properties from energy transport measurements during water evaporation. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 72:056302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lachenmeier DW (2008) Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity. J Occup Med Toxicol 3:26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Hare K, Spedding P, Grimshaw J (1993) Evaporation of the ethanol and water components comprising a binary liquid mixture. Dev Chem Eng Miner Process 1:118–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopkins RJ, Reid JP (2005) Evaporation of ethanol/water droplets: examining the temporal evolution of droplet size, composition and temperature. J Phys Chem A 109:7923–7931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bongers CC, Hopman MT, Eijsvogels TM (2017) Cooling interventions for athletes: An overview of effectiveness, physiological mechanisms, and practical considerations. Temperature (Austin) 4:60–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiner JS, Khogali M (1980) A physiological body-cooling unit for treatment of heat stroke. Lancet 1:507–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hadad E, Moran DS, Epstein Y (2004) Cooling heat stroke patients by available field measures. Intensiv Care Med 30:338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohner-Spengler M, Frotzler A, Honigmann P, Babst R (2014) Effective treatment of posttraumatic and postoperative edema in patients with ankle and hindfoot fractures: a randomized controlled trial comparing multilayer compression therapy and intermittent impulse compression with the standard treatment with ice. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:1263–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YHP: lead investigator and first author, writing manuscript. JHS: performing study intervention and data analysis. TJK: outcome assessment and manuscript review. SHK: outcome assessment and data analysis. ASC: outcome assessment and data analysis. HJK: corresponding author and study coordinator, manuscript review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hak Jun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the contents of this study.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the authors' institutions. All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, Y.H., Song, J.H., Kim, T.J. et al. Comparison of the use of evaporative coolants and ice packs for the management of preoperative edema and pain in ankle fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 1399–1405 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03222-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03222-7

Keywords

Navigation