Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical fixation of pilon injuries: a comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approach

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study looks to compare patient outcomes in those with pilon fractures fixed with the anterolateral approach versus those with the posterolateral approach.

Methods

135 patient charts of those with surgically treated pilon fractures over a 7-year period were retrospectively reviewed, recording demographic information, fracture description, surgical intervention timeline, operative outcomes, patient outcomes, and complication rates.

Results

Of the 44 included patients (32 anterolateral and 12 posterolateral), most were older than 40 years of age (65.9%) and male (63.6%). There was no difference seen between anterolateral approach and posterolateral approach tourniquet times (p = 0.80), operating room time (p = 0.40), or estimated blood loss (p = 0.73). There was also no reported difference in decrease in Numerical Rating Scale pain scores (p = 0.38), FOTO (Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes) percent increase (p = 0.13), active flexion–extension axis range of motion (p = 0.35), or inversion–eversion axis (p = 0.25) range of motion after an anterolateral approach versus a posterolateral approach. Finally, statistically similar complication rates (p = 0.75) were seen between anterolateral and posterolateral approaches, but patients who underwent a posterolateral approach surgical fixation were trending towards significantly using more post-operative outpatient opioid medications for pain control compared to those who underwent surgical fixation with an anterolateral approach (p = 0.09).

Conclusions

Pilon injuries that lend themselves to anterolateral fixation have similar outcomes peri-operatively and post-operatively compared to injuries lending to posterolateral fixation. Both approaches can be used as dictated by the injury not fearing poorer outcomes or increased complication rates. However, surgeons must be wary of high complication rates associated with all pilon injury patterns.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonin JG (1950) Injuries to the Ankle. William Heinemann, London, pp 248–260

    Google Scholar 

  2. Destot EA (1911) Traumatismes du pied et rayons X: malleoles-astragale-calcaneum-avant-pied. Masson

  3. Borrelli J, Catalano L (1999) Open reduction and internal fixation of pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 13(8):573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rüedi TP, Allgöwer M (1969) Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle-joint. Injury 1(2):92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellam JF, Waddell JP (1979) Fractures of the distal tibial metaphysis with intra-articular extension-the distal tibial explosion fracture. J Trauma Acute Care Surg:593–601

  6. Assal M, Ray A, Stern R (2015) Strategies for surgical approaches in open reduction internal fixation of pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 29(2):69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borrelli J, Ellis E (2002) Pilon fractures: assessment and treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 33(1):231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Höntzsch D, Karnatz N, Jansen T (1990) One-or two-step management (with external fixator) of severe pilon-tibial fractures. Aktuelle Traumatologie 20(4):199–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liporace FA, Yoon RS (2012) Decisions and staging leading to definitive open management of pilon fractures: where have we come from and where are we now? J Orthop Trauma 26(8):488–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rüedi TP, Allgöwer M (1979) The operative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the lower end of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H (1979) Manual of internal fixation. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–14

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Makwana NK, Bhowal B, Harper WM, Hui AW (2001) Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. Bone Jt J 83(4):525–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patterson MJ, Cole JD (1999) Two-staged delayed open reduction and internal fixation of severe pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 13(2):85–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sirkin M, Sanders R, DiPasquale T, Herscovici D Jr (1999) A staged protocol for soft tissue management in the treatment of complex pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 13(2):78–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brumback RJ, McGarvey WC (1995) Fractures of the tibial plafond. Evolving treatment concepts for the pilon fracture. Orthop Clin North Am 26(2):273–285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Mowafi H, El-Hawary A, Kandil Y (2015) The management of tibial pilon fractures with the Ilizarov fixator: the role of ankle arthroscopy. Foot 25(4):238–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Femino JE, Vaseenon T (2009) The direct lateral approach to the distal tibia and fibula: a single incision technique for distal tibial and pilon fractures. Iowa Orthop J 29:143

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Carbonell-Escobar R, Rubio-Suarez JC, Ibarzabal-Gil A, Rodriguez-Merchan EC (2017) Analysis of the variables affecting outcome in fractures of the tibial pilon treated by open reduction and internal fixation. J Clin Orthop Trauma 8(4):332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Helfet DL, Koval K, Pappas J, Sanders RW, DiPasquale T (1994) Intraarticular” pilon” fracture of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blauth M, Bastian L, Krettek C, Knop C, Evans S (2001) Surgical options for the treatment of severe tibial pilon fractures: a study of three techniques. J Orthop Trauma 15(3):153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jia SH, Huang CL, Xu HW, Gong SL (2016) Surgical treatment for posterior Pilon fracture through posterolateral approach. Zhongguo Gu Shang 29(6):557–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhattacharyya T, Crichlow R, Gobezie R, Kim E, Vrahas MS (2006) Complications associated with the posterolateral approach for pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20(2):104–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ketz J, Sanders R (2012) Staged posterior tibial plating for the treatment of Orthopaedic Trauma Association 43C2 and 43C3 tibial pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 26(6):341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oken OF, Yildirim AO, Asilturk M (2017) Finite element analysis of the stability of AO/OTA 43-C1 type distal tibial fractures treated with distal tibia medial anatomic plate versus anterolateral anatomic plate. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 51(5):404–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kellam JF, Meinberg EG, Agel J, Karam MD, Roberts CS (2018) Introduction: fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2018 International Comprehensive Classification of Fractures and Dislocations Committee. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–S0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hak DJ (2012) Anterolateral approach for tibial pilon fractures. Orthop 35(2):131–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Horisberger M, Valderrabano V, Hintermann B (2009) Posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis after ankle-related fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23(1):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harris AM, Patterson BM, Sontich JK, Vallier HA (2006) Results and outcomes after operative treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27(4):256–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pollak AN, McCarthy ML, Bess RS, Agel J, Swiontkowski MF (2003) Outcomes after treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 85(10):1893–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ting AJ, Tarr RR, Sarmiento A, Wagner K, Resnick C (1987) The role of subtalar motion and ankle contact pressure changes from angular deformities of the tibia. Foot Ankle 7(5):290–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Amorosa LF, Brown GD, Greisberg J (2010) A surgical approach to posterior pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(3):188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chung F, Ritchie E, Su J (1997) Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 85(4):808–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kehlet H, Wilkinson RC, Fischer HB, Camu F, Prospect Working Group (2007) PROSPECT: evidence-based, procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 21(1):149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kohring JM, Orgain NG (2017) Multimodal Analgesia in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Orthop Clin 48(4):495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Castillo RC, Raja SN, Frey KP, Vallier HA, Tornetta P III, Jaeblon T, Goff BJ, Gottschalk A, Scharfstein DO, O’Toole RV (2017) Improving pain management and long-term outcomes following high-energy orthopaedic trauma (Pain Study). J Orthop Trauma 31:S71–S77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McQuay HJ, Carroll D, Moore RA (1988) Postoperative orthopaedic pain—the effect of opiate premedication and local anaesthetic blocks. Pain 33(3):291–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sanders A, Gupta A, Jones M, Roberts M, Levine D, Drakos M, O’Malley M, Elliott A, Deland J, Ellis S, Kumar K (2017) Pain management after outpatient foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Orthop 2(3):2473011417S000350

    Google Scholar 

  38. McFerran MA, Smith SW, Boulas HJ, Schwartz HS (1992) Complications encountered in the treatment of pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 6(2):195–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Teeny SM, Wiss DA (1993) Open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plafond fractures: variables contributing to poor results and complications. Clin Orthop Rel Res 292:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xin T, Tang PF, Wang MY, LÜ DC, Liu MZ, Liu CJ, Yi L, Sun LZ, Huang LJ, Li Y, Zhao YG (2012) Pilon fractures: a new classification and therapeutic strategies. Chin Med J 125(14):2487–2492

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen DW, Li B, Aubeeluck A, Yang YF, Zhou JQ, Yu GR (2014) Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior pilon fractures with buttress plate. Acta Orthop 22(1):48–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R (2007) Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury 38(3):365–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Szczęsny G, Janowicz J (2012) Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of ankle fractures. Pol Orthop Traumatol 77:145–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kritsaneephaiboon A, Vaseenon T, Tangtrakulwanich B (2013) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal tibial fracture using a posterolateral approach: a cadaveric study and preliminary report. Int Orthop 37(1):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vidović D, Matejčić A, Ivica M, Jurišić D, Elabjer E, Bakota B (2015) Minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibial fractures: results and complications. Injury 46:S96–S99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Aaron Leatherman, PA-C for his contributions to the data collection process that allowed us to complete this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Luke’s University Health Network, 801 Ostrum Street Bethlehem, Fountain Hill, PA, 18015, USA

    Ajith Malige, Shawn Yeazell & Chinenye Nwachuku

Authors
  1. Ajith Malige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shawn Yeazell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chinenye Nwachuku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajith Malige.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was obtained both from the St. Luke’s University Health Network IRB Committee and the Temple University School of Medicine IRB Committee. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malige, A., Yeazell, S. & Nwachuku, C. Surgical fixation of pilon injuries: a comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 1179–1185 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03145-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03145-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation