Abstract
Background
Proper patellofemoral alignment is an important goal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Acceptable patellar alignment is defined as patellar tilt less than or equal to 5° and patellar displacement less than or equal to 5 mm. Previous studies reported an incidence of post-operative patellar malalignment in TKA from 7 to 35%. However, correlation between patellar malalignment and clinical outcome after TKA remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of patellar tilt and displacement on the clinical outcome of TKA.
Methods
A retrospective review of 138 primary TKAs with a minimum of 2 year follow-up is reported. Pre-operative and post-operative mechanical axis, patellar tilting angle and patellar displacement were measured. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the knee functional scores including the Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at final follow-up.
Results
Forty-two (30%) primary TKAs had suboptimal patellofemoral alignment with a patellar tilt angle greater than 5° or lateral patellar displacement of more than 5 mm. There was no statistical difference in pre-operative mechanical axis, pre-operative patellar tilt angle, or pre-operative lateral patellar displacement between the primary TKAs with proper patellofemoral alignment and those with suboptimal alignment. Patients with post-operative patellar tilt or displacement had clinically significant reductions in KSS, KOOS, and WOMAC when compared with patients without post-operative patellar tilt or displacement. The odds of having a fair or poor post-operative result, an odds ratio of 3.4 (95% CI 1.6–7.2) for KSS, 6.4 (95% CI 2.9–14.2) for KOOS, and 5.9 (95% CI 2.6–13.5) for WOMAC, were associated with suboptimal patellofemoral alignment.
Conclusion
Establishing proper patellofemoral alignment remains an essential goal of primary TKA. There is a strong association between suboptimal post-operative patellofemoral alignment and poor clinical outcome scores after primary TKA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harwin SF (1998) Patellofemoral complications in symmetrical total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:753–762
Mont MA, Yoon TR, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS (1999) Eliminating patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty: Clinical and radiographic results of 121 consecutive cases using the Duracon system. J Arthroplasty 14:446–455
Rand JA (2004) Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. JBJS-A 2062
Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ et al (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144
Lakstein D, ZarrabianM, Kosashvili Y et al (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty for component malrotation is highly beneficial: a case control study. J Arthroplasty 1047
Bell SW, Young P, Drury C, Smith J, Anthony I, Jones B, Blyth M, McLean A (2014) Component rotational alignment in unexplained painful primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(1):272–277
Nicoll D, Rowley DI (2010) Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(9):1238–1244
Bédard M, Vince KG, Redfern J, Collen SR (2011) Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(8):2346–2355
Bhattee G, Moonot P, Govindaswamy R, Pope A, Fiddian N, Harvey A (2014) Does malrotation of components correlate with patient dissatisfaction following secondary patellar resurfacing? Knee 21(1):247–251
Panni AS, Ascione F, Rossini M, Braile A, Corona K, Vasso M, Hirschmann MT (2018) Tibial internal rotation negatively affects clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(6):1636–1644
Grelsamer RP, Bazos AN, Proctor CS (1993) Radiographic analysis of patellar tilt. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(5):822–824
Bindelglass DF, Cohen JL, Dorr LD (1993) Patellar tilt and subluxation in total knee arthroplasty: relationship to pain, fixation, and design. Clin Orthop 286:103 (J Arthroplasty 1 I:507, 1996)
Bindelglass DE, Vince KG (1996) Patellar tilt and subluxation following subvastus and parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Implication for surgical technique. J Arthroplasty 11(5):507–511
Pongcharoen B, Yakampor T, Charoencholvanish K (2013) Patellar tracking and anterior knee pain are similar after medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(5):1654–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2778-5
McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M (2002) Preoperative hip to ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:196–202
Merchant AC, Mercer RL, Jacobsen RH, Cool CR (1974) Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56-A:139 l–6
Gomes G, Scharf SC, Meltzer LP, Scott WN (1988) Patellar prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty: a roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop 236:72
Kessler O, Patil S, Colwell CW Jr., D’Lima DD (2008) The effect of femoral component malrotation on patellar biomechanics. J Biomech 41(16):3332–3339
Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Iranpour F, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2011) The effect of femoral component rotation on the kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(9):1479–1487
Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Baena FR, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2014) Patellar thickness and lateral retinacular release affects patellofemoral kinematics in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(3):526–533
Bracey DN, Brown ML, Beard HR, Mannava S, Nazir OF, Seyler TM, Lang JE (2015) Effects of patellofemoral overstuffing on knee flexion and patellar kinematics following total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Int Orthop 39(9):1715–1722
Maderbacher G, Keshmiri A, Springorum HR, Maderbacher H, Grifka J, Baier C (2017) Influence of component rotation in total knee arthroplasty on tibiofemoral kinematics-a cadaveric investigation. J Arthroplasty 32(9):2869–2877
Calliess T, Ettinger M, Schado S, Becher C, Hurschler C, Ostermeier S (2016) Patella tracking and patella contact pressure in modular patellofemoral arthroplasty: a biomechanical in vitro analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(6):849–855
Sharma GB, Saevarsson SK, Amiri S, Montgomery S, Ramm H, Lichti DD, Lieck R, Zachow S, Anglin C (2012) Radiological method for measuring patellofemoral tracking and tibiofemoral kinematics before and after total knee replacement. Bone Joint Res 1(10):263–271
Slevin O, Schmid FA, Schiapparelli F, Rasch H, Hirschmann MT (2018) Increased in vivo patellofemoral loading after total knee arthroplasty in resurfaced patellae. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(6):1805–1810
Young SW, Saffi M, Spangehl MJ, Clarke HD (2018) Unexplained pain following total knee arthroplasty: Is rotational malalignment the problem? Knee 25(2):329–334
Laurin CA, Dussault R, Levesque HP (1979) The tangential X-ray investigation of the patellofemoral joint: X-ray technique, diagnostic criteria and their interpretation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:16–26
Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:46–55
Cerciello S, Robin J, Lustig S, Maccauro G, Heyse TJ, Neyret P (2016) The role of patelloplasty in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(11):1607–1613
Sensi L, Buzzi R, Giron F, De Luca L, Aglietti P (2011) Patellofemoral function after total knee arthroplasty: gender-related differences. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1475–1480
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethics committee approvals were obtained.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narkbunnam, R., Electricwala, A.J., Huddleston, J.I. et al. Suboptimal patellofemoral alignment is associated with poor clinical outcome scores after primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 249–254 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3073-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3073-z