Periprosthetic acetabular radiolucency progression in mid-term follow-up of the articular surface replacement hip system
- 144 Downloads
Recent registry studies show that aseptic loosening secondary to osteolysis is the second leading cause of hip implant failure in patients implanted with metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings. The primary aim of our study was to report on the progression of acetabular osteolysis during mid-term follow-up in patients treated with MoM hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and MoM total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary aim was to identify independent predictors of osteolytic lesion progression.
Materials and methods
A total of 805 patients (805 hips) were included in this study (541 MoM HRA, 264 MoM THA) from a prospective, international clinical registry of the Articular Surface Replacement Hip System. Patients were enrolled a median of 6.6 years from surgery. Osteolytic lesion progression was defined either as any lesion developing de novo, or as an existing lesion progressing from radiolucency to osteolysis during the study period (range 0.5–4.3 years).
The number of cases with any osteolysis or radiolucency was 21 (3.9%) for ASR HRA and 29 (11.0%) for ASR XL THA at enrollment and increased to 69 (12.8%) for ASR HRA and 41 (15.5%) for ASR XL THA after follow-up. Osteolytic lesion progression was found in 66 (12.2%) ASR HRA patients and 31 (11.7%) ASR XL THA patients. Multivariate models determined that lower acetabular version angle (OR 0.963, p = 0.011) and elevated whole blood chromium (OR 1.110, p = 0.044) were independent predictors of osteolytic lesion progression in ASR HRA.
We suggest that physicians of patients implanted with ASR HRA implants closely monitor patients with higher chromium levels and lower version angles, as they are at increased risk for osteolytic lesion progression, and we recommend annual radiographic follow-up on all patients with ASR implants.
KeywordsOsteolysis Radiolucency Metal-on-metal THA HRA
This study was funded by DePuy Synthes (Grant number 1200220692).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The following authors declare a conflict of interest: OM—receives royalties from: Zimmer, Biomet, Corin, Iconacy, Renovis, Conformis, Aston Medical, Meril Healthcare, Arthrex, Mako; owns stock in: Cambridge Polymer Group, Orthopedic Technology group; receives institutional support from: Mako, DePuy. HM—receives royalties from Zimmer, Biomet, Corin, RSA Biomedical; owns stock in RSA Biomedical; receives institutional support from: Biomet, Smith & Nephew, DePuy, Zimmer, Mako.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.AOANJRR (2009) Hip and Knee Arthroplasty—Annual Report 2008Google Scholar
- 6.MHRA (2017) Medical device alert. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5954ca1ded915d0baa00009b/MDA-2017-018_Final.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2017
- 9.AOANJRR (2016) Metal on metal bearing surface conventional hip arthroplasty—supplementary report 2016Google Scholar
- 14.Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, Clohisy JC, Beaulé PE, Della Valle CJ (2016) The adult hip, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 16.Galea VP, Laaksonen I, Matuszak SJ et al (2017) Mid-term changes in blood metal ion levels after articular surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Bone Jt J 99-B:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1250.R1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32Google Scholar
- 23.Gutman G, Hershkovich O, Amit Y, Israeli A (2013) Catastrophic failure due to massive osteolysis of both acetabular and femoral components in a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a demonstrative case report. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23:225–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1088-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Langton DJ, Sprowson AP, Joyce TJ et al (2009) Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91–B:1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Kitamura N, Pappedemos PC, Duffy PR et al (2006) The value of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs for evaluating pelvic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000246554.41058.8d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar