Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of infra-isthmal femoral fracture with an intramedullary nail: Is retrograde nailing a better option than antegrade nailing?

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing is ideal for femoral shaft fractures, but fixing the fracture distal to the isthmal level may be difficult because of medullary canal widening and the proximity of fracture location from the distal femoral joint line. This study aimed to compare treatment results between antegrade and retrograde nailing for infra-isthmal femoral shaft fracture, and to identify influencing factors of nonunion and malalignment.

Materials and methods

Sixty patients with infra-isthmal femoral shaft fractures treated with IM nailing and followed-up for > 1 year were enrolled in this retrospective study, 38 in the antegrade nailing group, and 22 in the retrograde nailing group. The two groups had no significant differences in age, sex, and fracture location (p = 0.297, Mann–Whitney test). Radiological evaluation was performed, and functional result was assessed using the Knee Society scoring system. Complications were analyzed in accordance with fracture location, fracture type, and operative method.

Results

According to the AO/OTA classification, 35, 16, and 9 cases were type A (A1: 1, A2: 11, A3: 23), B (B1: 2, B2: 7, B3: 7), and C fractures (C2: 4, C3: 5), respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 29.5 months. In the antegrade and retrograde nailing groups, the primary bony union rates were 73.7% in 20.7 weeks (range 12–41) and 86.4% in 17.4 weeks (range 12–30), respectively. The two groups showed no significant differences in union rate (p = 0.251, Pearson’s Chi-square test) and union time (p = 0.897, Mann–Whitney test). No cases of malalignment of > 10° in any plane were found in both groups. The mean Knee Society scores were 92 (range 84–100) and 91 (range 83–95) in the antegrade and retrograde nailing groups, respectively, showing no significant difference (p = 0.297, Pearson’s Chi-square test). Although fracture location was not significantly related to union rate (p = 0.584, Mann–Whitney test), patients with an effective working length of the distal segment of < 0.75 were prone to nonunion (p = 0.003, Pearson’s Chi-square test).

Conclusions

Although no significant difference was found in IM nail type, the IM nail with a shorter working length distal to the fracture showed a strong relationship with nonunion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giannoudis PV, Stavrou PZ, Papakostidis C (2014) Nailing of femoral shaft fractures. In: Bentley G (ed) European surgical orthopaedics and traumatology: the EFORT textbook. Springer, London, pp 2677–2697

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Haidukewych GJ (2009) Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:296–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. el Moumni M, Voogd EH, ten Duis HJ, Wendt KW (2012) Long-term functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Injury 43:1154–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (2001) Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:161–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ostrum RF, Agarwal A, Lakatos R, Poka A (2000) Prospective comparison of retrograde and antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 14:496–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herscovici D Jr, Ricci WM, McAndrews P, DiPasquale T, Sanders R (2000) Treatment of femoral shaft fracture using unreamed interlocked nails. J Orthop Trauma 14:10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Papadokostakis G, Papakostidis C, Dimitriou R, Giannoudis PV (2005) The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury 36:813–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tornetta P III, Tiburzi D (2000) Antegrade or retrograde reamed femoral nailing. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 82:652–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolinsky PR, McCarty E, Shyr Y, Johnson K (1999) Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases. J Trauma 46:392–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ostrum RF, Maurer JP (2009) Distal third femur fractures treated with retrograde femoral nailing and blocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 23:681–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leggon RE, Feldmann DD (2001) Retrograde femoral nailing: a focus on the knee. Am J Knee Surg 14:109–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhn KM, Ali A, Boudreau JA, Cannada LK, Watson JT (2013) Antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing of proximal third femur fractures. J Surg Orthop Adv 22:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dougherty PJ, Gherebeh P, Zekaj M, Sethi S, Oliphant B, Vaidya R (2013) Retrograde versus antegrade intramedullary nailing of gunshot diaphyseal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3974–3980

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang KH, Kim JR, Park J (2012) Nonisthmal femoral shaft nonunion as a risk factor for exchange nailing failure. J Trauma 72:E60–E64

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mehling I, Hoehle P, Sternstein W, Blum J, Rommens PM (2013) Nailing versus plating for comminuted fractures of the distal femur: a comparative biomechanical in vitro study of three implants. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39:139–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gansslen A, Gosling T, Hildebrand F, Pape HC, Oestern HJ (2014) Femoral shaft fractures in adults: treatment options and controversies. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 81:108–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moed BR, Watson JT (1995) Retrograde intramedullary nailing, without reaming, of fractures of the femoral shaft in multiply injured patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1520–1527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu CK, Singh VA, Mariapan S, Chong ST (2007) Antegrade versus retrograde locked intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures: Which is better? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 33:135–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Herscovici D Jr, Whiteman KW (1996) Retrograde nailing of the femur using an intercondylar approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 332:98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray P, Bergin P, Labropoulos P, Gunther S (2008) Retrograde femoral nailing and knee function. Orthopedics 31:985

    Google Scholar 

  21. Daglar B, Gungor E, Delialioglu OM, Karakus D, Ersoz M, Tasbas BA, Bayrakci K, Gunel U (2009) Comparison of knee function after antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femoral fractures: results of isokinetic evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 23:640–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Lewis R, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, Dipasquale T, Sanders R (2001) Angular malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:90–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Biomedical Research Institute Grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital (2017-General-16).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Wug Oh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The design and protocol of this study were approved by the institutional review board of Kyungpook National University Hospital (IRB no: KNUH 2016-07-010).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JW., Oh, CW., Oh, JK. et al. Treatment of infra-isthmal femoral fracture with an intramedullary nail: Is retrograde nailing a better option than antegrade nailing?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 1241–1247 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2961-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2961-6

Keywords

Navigation