Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture with a standardised protocol
A treatment protocol favouring non-operative treatment and based on early weight-bearing and early range-of-motion exercises was implemented in standard clinical care of a level I trauma clinic.
Materials and methods
All patients treated due to acute Achilles tendon rupture between 2008 and 2014 were included in the study (n = 411). The patient records were retrospectively evaluated.
The mean age of patients was 47 (range 17–88) years. In total, 213 (52%) acute Achilles tendon ruptures were treated operatively and 198 (48%) non-operatively. The annual proportion of operatively treated patients declined from 70 to 21% during the study period. The traumatic re-rupture rate was similar between the operative (4%) and the non-operative (6%) treatment groups (p = 0.385), even though the patients in the non-operative group were significantly older and had more co-morbidities than the operatively treated patients. Of the operatively treated patients, 10% (n = 21) had wound healing problems. In 6/198 patients, the non-operative treatment had to be converted to surgical treatment in the early phase. Unsatisfactory functional outcome after the treatment was reported in 7/213 patients in the operative and 10/198 in the non-operative group (p = 0.234).
Our study showed that it is possible to implement a standardised treatment protocol to guide the decision-making and treatment and of an acute Achilles tendon rupture as a part of the daily care in a large standard trauma hospital. The clinical outcome and the rate of complications were fully comparable to the good clinical results achieved in RCT-study settings despite the heterogeneity of the treated patients and non-specialisation of the medical staff, showing that the protocol could find the most reasonable treatment for each patient and reduced dramatically the rate of operative treatment.
Level of evidence
Level III, comparative series.
KeywordsAchilles tendon Acute Achilles tendon rupture Treatment protocol Complications
The study was financially supported by the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital, grant numbers 9R006 and 9R031.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Pirkanmaa District Hospital (approval number R11005).
The study data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of the patients who were treated according the hospital treatment protocol, so informed consent was not needed.
- 1.Ganestam A, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, Barfod KW (2015) Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol ArthroscGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hutchison AM, Topliss C, Beard D, Evans RM, Williams P (2015) The treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon using a dedicated management programme. Bone Joint J, 97-B(4):510–515Google Scholar
- 6.Khan RJ, Carey Smith RL (2010) Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(9):CD003674Google Scholar
- 7.Khan RJ, Fick D, Brammar TJ, Crawford J, Parker MJ (2004) Interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3):CD003674Google Scholar
- 10.Mattila VM, Huttunen TT, Haapasalo H, Sillanpaa P, Malmivaara A, Pihlajamaki H (2015) Declining incidence of surgery for Achilles tendon rupture follows publication of major RCTs: evidence-influenced change evident using the Finnish registry study. Br J Sports Med 49(16):1084–1086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sheth U, Wasserstein D, Jenkinson R, Moineddin R, Kreder H, Jaglal SB (2017) The epidemiology and trends in management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study of 27 607 patients. Bone Joint J, 99(B(1)):78–86Google Scholar