Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration following occipitoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial instability in non-rheumatoid arthritis

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following occipitoaxial fusion (OAF) for atlantoaxial instability (AAI) in non-rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

The study group comprised 41 patients without RA who underwent OAF due to AAI. Fifteen patients with postoperative ASD after OAF were classified as the ASD group, and the other 26 patients without postoperative ASD were included in the non-ASD group. There were 12 men and 3 women with a mean age of 43.52 years in the ASD group, and 19 men and 7 women with a mean age of 45.31 years in the non-ASD group. The mean follow-up period was 6.1 and 5.9 years in the ASD group and non-ASD group, respectively. Clinical outcomes and plain radiographs were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the two groups.

Results

The difference between pre- and postoperative O-C2 angles in the non-ASD group was significantly greater than that in the ASD group. The C2–7 angles changed significantly between the pre- and postoperative periods. It was suggested that the small O-C2 angle and large C2–7 angle observed in the early postoperative period were risk factors for the development of ASD. We also demonstrated a high incidence of subaxial subluxation (SAS) and swan neck deformity in the ASD group (27 versus 3.8% and 20 versus 0%, respectively).

Conclusion

Under-correction of the O-C2 angle is likely to cause malalignment of the cervical spine, resulting in the development of postoperative ASD, SAS, and swan neck deformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Subin B, Liu JF, Marshall GJ, Huang HY, Ou JH, Xu GZ (1995) Transoral anterior decompression and fusion of chronic irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation with spinal cord compression. Spine 20(11):1233–1240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Passias PG, Wang S, Kozanek M, Wang S, Wang C (2013) Relationship between the alignment of the occipitoaxial and subaxial cervical spine in patients with congenital atlantoxial dislocations. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31823097f9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsunaga S, Onishi T, Sakou T (2001) Significance of occipitoaxial angle in subaxial lesion after occipitocervical fusion. Spine 26(2):161–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke MJ, Cohen-Gadol AA, Ebersold MJ, Cabanela ME (2006) Long-term incidence of subaxial cervical spine instability following cervical arthrodesis surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Surg Neurol 66(2):136–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.12.037 (discussion 140)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan DP, Ngian KS, Cohen L (1992) Posterior upper cervical fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine 17(3):268–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal AK, Peppelman WC, Kraus DR, Pollock BH, Stolzer BL, Eisenbeis CH Jr, Donaldson WF 3rd (1992) Recurrence of cervical spine instability in rheumatoid arthritis following previous fusion: can disease progression be prevented by early surgery? J Rheumatol 19(9):1364–1370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Maruiwa H, Nakamura M, Nishizawa T, Toyama Y (2003) Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 99(1 Suppl):80–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishii K, Matsumoto M, Takahashi Y, Okada E, Watanabe K, Tsuji T, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Chiba K (2010) Risk factors for development of subaxial subluxations following atlantoaxial arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine 35(16):1551–1555. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af0d85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miyata M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Ito H, Takemoto M, Nakamura T (2009) O-C2 angle as a predictor of dyspnea and/or dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion. Spine 34(2):184–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ff64e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Passias PG, Wang S, Zhao D, Wang S, Kozanek M, Wang C (2013) The reversibility of swan neck deformity in chronic atlantoaxial dislocations. Spine 38(7):E379–E385. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828625e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshimoto H, Ito M, Abumi K, Kotani Y, Shono Y, Takada T, Minami A (2004) A retrospective radiographic analysis of subaxial sagittal alignment after posterior C1–2 fusion. Spine 29(2):175–181. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000107225.97653.CA

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kato Y, Itoh T, Kanaya K, Kubota M, Ito S (2006) Relation between atlantoaxial (C1/2) and cervical alignment (C2–7) angles with Magerl and Brooks techniques for atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthop Sci 11(4):347–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-006-1033-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Zou J, Tow B, Alanay A, Abitbol JJ, Wang JC (2008) Kinematic analysis of the relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit of the cervical spine. Spine 33(2):187–193. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181604501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayashi T, Daubs MD, Suzuki A, Scott TP, Phan K, Aghdasi B, Ruangchainikom M, Hu X, Lee C, Takahashi S, Shiba K, Wang JC (2016) The compensatory relationship of upper and subaxial cervical motion in the presence of cervical spondylosis. Clin Spine Surg 29(4):E196–E200. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aab240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooks AL, Jenkins EB (1978) Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60(3):279–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oshima S, Sudo H, Ito M, Abumi K (2015) Subaxial sagittal alignment after atlantoaxial fixation techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(1):E49–E55. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, Fujii R, Iwasaki M, Fuchiya T, Fujiwara K, Fuji T, Yoshikawa H (2007) Sagittal alignment of the subaxial cervical spine after C1–2 transarticular screw fixation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(6):436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung JY, Kim SK, Jung ST, Lee KB (2014) Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Spine J 14(10):2290–2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao RD, Gore DR, Tang SJ, Rebholz BJ, Yoganandan N, Wang M (2016) Radiographic changes in the cervical spine following anterior arthrodesis: a long-term analysis of 166 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 98(19):1606–1613. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01061

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Grants from Capital Characteristic Clinical project of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (http://www.bjkw.gov.cn/n8785584/index.html) (Grant no. Z161100000516009). No individuals employed or contracted by the funders played any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingsheng Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from local Medical Ethics Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Qi, Y., Tan, M. et al. Incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration following occipitoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial instability in non-rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 921–927 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2929-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2929-6

Keywords

Navigation