Efficiency and predictive parameters of outcome of a multimodal pain management concept with spinal injections in patients with low back pain: a retrospective study of 445 patients
- 152 Downloads
Low back pain is one of the most common diseases of modern civilization. Multimodal pain management (MPM) represents a central approach to avoiding surgery. Short-term results are published rarely and often incomparable because of different treatment concepts. This study compared the subjective and objective parameters as well as the anamnestic and clinical parameters of 445 patients with low back pain before and after inpatient MPM to investigate the influence of this type of therapy on short-term outcome. The majority of patients were very satisfied (39%) or satisfied (58%) with the treatment outcome. The median pain reduction for back pain was 3.0 (IQR 2.88) (numeric rating scale, NRS), thus 66% and 2.75 (IQR 3.38, 62%) for leg pain. The main pain reduction occurred within the first 10 days of treatment and was clinically significant from day 5 onwards. The outcome for patients with hospitalization of more than 10 days was significantly worse. The parameters female sex, BMI of > 30, local pain, and pain duration of 3–24 months had a significantly better outcome. In contrast, age, treatment cause, depression, anxiety, and other diseases had no statistically significant influence on outcome. MPM therapy for more than 5 days seems to be an efficient short-term approach to treating low back pain. Knowledge of some of the outcome predictors helps to early identify patients who require more intensive individual care. In the case of no clear indication for surgery, MPM can be an appropriate treatment option.
KeywordsLumbar spinal stenosis Multimodal therapeutic treatment Spinal injection Injection therapy Conservative treatment
We are grateful to Monika C. Schoell for medical editing.
MB, TS, MK, JG and AB made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. MB, FZ, MK and AB participated in the acquisition of data, analysis and statistics. All authors made contributions to the interpretation of data and have been involved in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
The study was approved by the Ethics Commission of the University of Regensburg and carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Registration in Deutsche Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS), German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00011788.
- 2.Benyamin RM, Manchikanti L, Parr AT, Diwan S, Singh V, Falco FJ, Datta S, Abdi S, Hirsch JA (2012) The effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain. Pain Phys 4:E363–E404Google Scholar
- 3.GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2016) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet 10053:1545–1602Google Scholar
- 6.Giesche F, Streicher H, Maiwald M, Wagner P (2017) Inpatient multimodal pain therapy: additive value of neuromuscular core stability exercises for chronic back pain. Schmerz 2:115–122Google Scholar
- 7.Benditz A, Loher M, Boluki D, Grifka J, Völlner F, Renkawitz T, Maderbacher G, Götz J (2017) Positive medium-term influence of multimodal pain management on socioeconomic factors and health care utilization in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a prospective study. J Pain Res 10:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, van Tulder MW (2014) Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD000963. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3
- 18.Theodoridis T, Mamarvar R, Krämer J, Wiese M, Teske W (2009) Angle of needle position for the epidural–perineural injection at the lumbar spine. Z Orthop Unfall 1:65–68Google Scholar
- 20.Hamel M, Maier A, Weh L, Klein A, Lucan S, Marnitz U (2009) “Work hardening” bei chronischen rückenschmerzen. Orthopade 10:928–936Google Scholar
- 22.Gaul C, Mette E, Schmidt T, Grond S (2008) Praxistauglichkeit einer deutschen version des “Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire”. Der Schmerz 1:51–58Google Scholar
- 24.Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, medical outcomes study questionnaire short form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 6:968 – 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J, IMMPACT (2005) Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 1–2:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Herrmann C, Buss U, Lingen R, Kreuzer H (1994) The screening for anxiety and depression in routine medical care. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 38:1283–1286Google Scholar
- 33.Grifka J, Broll-Zeitvogel E, Anders S (1999) Injection therapy in lumbar syndromes. Orthopade 11:922–931Google Scholar
- 34.Broll-Zeitvogel E, Grifka J, Bauer J, Roths PH, Degryse P (1999) Medical training therapy in lumbar syndromes. Orthopade 11:932–938Google Scholar
- 35.Brodke DS, Ritter SM (2005) Nonsurgical management of low back pain and lumbar disk degeneration. Instr Course Lect 279–286Google Scholar
- 36.Casser HR, Arnold B, Brinkschmidt T, Gralow I, Irnich D, Klimczyk K, Nagel B, Pfingsten M, Sabatowski R, Schiltenwolf M, Sittl R, Söllner W (2013) Multidisciplinary assessment for multimodal pain therapy. Indications and range of performance. Schmerz 4:363–370Google Scholar
- 37.Arnold B, Brinkschmidt T, Casser HR, Diezemann A, Gralow I, Irnich D, Kaiser U, Klasen B, Klimczyk K, Lutz J, Nagel B, Pfingsten M, Sabatowski R, Schesser R, Schiltenwolf M, Seeger D, Söllner W (2014) Multimodal pain therapy for treatment of chronic pain syndrome. Consensus paper of the ad hoc commission on multimodal interdisciplinary pain management of the German pain society on treatment contents. Schmerz 5:459–472Google Scholar
- 39.Layne EI, Roffey DM, Coyle MJ, Phan P, Kingwell SP, Wai EK (2017) Activities performed and treatments conducted before consultation with a spine surgeon: are patients and clinicians following evidence-based clinical practice guidelines? Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.259 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.van Helvoirt H, Apeldoorn AT, Knol DL, Arts MP, Kamper SJ, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW (2016) Transforaminal epidural steroid injections influence mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) pain response classification in candidates for lumbar herniated disc surgery. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Benyamin RM (2013) A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in chronic axial or discogenic low back pain: results of 2-year follow-up. Pain Phys 5:E491–E504Google Scholar
- 43.Parr AT, Manchikanti L, Hameed H, Conn A, Manchikanti KN, Benyamin RM, Diwan S, Singh V, Abdi S (2012) Caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain: a systematic appraisal of the literature. Pain Phys 3:E159–E98Google Scholar
- 47.Kim HJ, Suh BG, Lee DB, Park JY, Kang KT, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS (2013) Gender difference of symptom severity in lumbar spinal stenosis: role of pain sensitivity. Pain Phys 6:E715–E23Google Scholar
- 51.von Heymann W (2015) Pseudo-radicular referred leg pain. Schmerz 6:667–676 (quiz 676–8) Google Scholar
- 52.Pyskło B, Styczyński T (1998) Influence of coexisting pseudo-radicular syndrome on the results of traction treatment in cases of lumbar intervertebral disk hernia. Neurol Neurochir Pol 6:1449–1460Google Scholar
- 53.Knutti O, Kaech DL (1998) Radicular and pseudo-radicular pain syndrome. Ther Umsch 10:601–612Google Scholar