Is treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients cost-covering? Results of a prospective study conducted at a German University Hospital
- 296 Downloads
Hip fractures have increased medical and socio-economic importance due to demographic transition. Information concerning direct treatment costs and their reimbursement in Germany is lacking.
Materials and methods
Four hundred two hip fracture patients older than 60 years of age were observed prospectively at a German University Hospital. Treatment costs were determined with up to 196 cost factors and compared to the reimbursement. Finally, statistical analysis was performed to identify clinical parameters influencing the cost–reimbursement relation.
Treatment costs were 8853 € (95% CI 8297–9410 €), while reimbursement was 8196 € (95% CI 7707–8772 €), resulting in a deficit of 657 € (95% CI 143–1117 €). Bivariate analysis showed that the cost–reimbursement relation was negatively influenced mainly by higher age, higher ASA score, readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and red blood cell transfusion. Adjusted for other parameters, readmission to the ICU was a significant negative predictor (− 2669 €; 95% CI – 4070 to − 1268 €; p < 0.001), while age of 60–75 years was a positive predictor for the cost–reimbursement relation (1373 €; 95% CI 265–2480 €; p = 0.015).
Treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients in a university hospital in Germany does not seem to be cost-covering. Adjustment of the reimbursement for treatment of complex hip fracture patients should be considered.
KeywordsOrtho-geriatrics Geriatric fracture Hip fracture Cost-effectiveness Treatment costs
The authors would like to thank Mr. Gerd Bodenbender for his support in determining the treatment costs.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Ström O, Borgström F, Kanis JA, Compston J, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B (2011) Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 6:59–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Anaestesiologists ASo (2015) American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system. http://www.asahq.org/resources/clinical-information/asa-physical-status-classification-system. Accessed 18 February 2015
- 14.German Federal Statistical Office (2016) https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/Methoden/FallpauschalenbezogeneKrankenhausstatistik.html. Accessed 22 November 2016
- 15.AQUA (2010). Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen; Sektorenübergreifende Qualitätssicherung, Hüftgelenksnahe Femurfraktur, Bundesauswertung. https://www.sqg.de/downloads/Bundesauswertungen/2010/bu_Gesamt_17N1-HUEFT-FRAK_2010.pdf (Download 21.02.2016)
- 16.Bliemel C, Lechler P, Oberkircher L, Colcuc C, Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Dodel R, Ruchholtz S, Buecking B (2015) Effect of preexisting cognitive impairment on in-patient treatment and discharge management among elderly patients with hip fractures. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 40:33–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Institut für das Entgeldsystem im Krankenhaus, G-DRG-System (2016). http://www.g-drg.de/cms/G-DRG-System_2016 (Download 01.02.2016)