Skip to main content

C-reactive protein course during the first 5 days after total knee arthroplasty cannot predict early prosthetic joint infection

Abstract

Introduction

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating major complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The laboratory value C-reactive protein (CRP) is the inflammatory biomarker most suitable for detecting a potential postoperative (p.o.) early infection in orthopaedic surgery. However, on the basis of multiple receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, CRP only has limited sensitivity and specificity. The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that, besides the absolute preoperative CRP value, also the absolute postoperative CRP value and its course over the first 5 days after TKA are valid indicators of periprosthetic early infection.

Materials and methods

A total of 1068 subjects who had been treated with a unilateral primary cemented total knee replacement due to primary osteoarthritis of the knee were included in the study. Retrospectively, for all patients, the preoperative CRP value, the p.o. CRP course and a history of the medical course, including any superficial surgical site infection (SSI) or deep PJI of the knee joint operated on, were recorded; further, any follow-up operations (septic revision) were documented. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an optimum preoperative CRP cutoff value for the positive prediction of a PJI was determined.

Results

34 of 1068 patients developed an SSI or a PJI that had to be revised. After TKA implantation, the CRP value increased significantly and achieved its maximum between the second and third p.o. day. At no p.o. day was there a difference in CRP between patients who developed an SSI or a deep PJI and patients with a normal complication-free p.o. course. In contrast, the preoperative CRP value proved to be a reliable predictor for septic revision due to an SSI or a PJI: the ROC analysis showed the optimum preoperative CRP cutoff value for a positive prediction of PJI to be 5 mg/L.

Conclusion

The most important finding of the present study is that neither the absolute p.o. CRP value nor its course in the first 5 days after TKA is suitable for detecting an early infection. In contrast, an increased preoperative CRP value proved to be a valid predictor for septic revision due to an SSI or a PJI after TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Zmistowski B, Karam JA, Durinka JB, Casper DS, Parvizi J (2013) Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(24):2177–2184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mulvey TJ, Thornhill TS (2001) Infected total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery off the knee. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 1875–1890

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Kim DJ (2015) The outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty: culture-positive versus culture-negative. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(10):1459–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, Spangehl M, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Steckelberg J, Osmon D (2010) Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(11):2102–2109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsson S, Thelander U, Friberg S (1992) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after elective orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 275:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moreschini O, Greggi G, Giordano MC, Nocente M, Margheritini F (2001) Postoperative physiopathological analysis of inflammatory parameters in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Int J Tissue React 23(4):151–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pepys MB (1981) C-reactive protein fifty years on. Lancet 1(8221):653–657

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanzén L, Carlsson AS (1989) The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in infected total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71(4):638–641

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. White J, Kelly M, Dunsmuir R (1998) C-reactive protein level after total hip and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5):909–911

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghanem E, Antoci V Jr, Pulido L, Joshi A, Hozack W, Parvizi J (2009) The use of receiver operating characteristics analysis in determining erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels in diagnosing periprosthetic infection prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis 13(6):e444–e449

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoell S, Moeller A, Gosheger G, Hardes J, Dieckmann R, Schulz D (2016) Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: what is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(4):447–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park KK, Kim TK, Chang CB, Yoon SW, Park KU (2008) Normative temporal values of CRP and ESR in unilateral and staged bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(1):179–188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alijanipour P, Bakhshi H, Parvizi J (2013) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the threshold for serological markers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(10):3186–3195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Widmer AF (2001) New developments in diagnosis and treatment of infection in orthopedic implants. Clin Infect Dis 33(Suppl 2):94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Janz V, Wassilew GI, Kribus M, Trampuz A, Perka C (2015) Improved identification of polymicrobial infection in total knee arthroplasty through sonicate fluid cultures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(10):1453–1457

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilgen O, Atici T, Durak K, Karaeminoğullari, Bilgen MS (2001) C-reactive protein values and erythrocyte sedimentation rates after total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Int Med Res 29(1):7–12

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yombi JC, Schwab PE, Thienpont E (2015) Serum C-reactive protein distribution in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty do not differ with distribution in conventional total knee arthroplasty. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0124788

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer TW, Parvizi J, Kobayashi N, Krebs V (2006) Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(4):869–882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, Barrack RL, Bauer TW (2006) Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):138–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nazem K, Motififard M, Yousefian M (2016) Variations in ESR and CRP in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in Iranian patients from 2009 to 2011. Adv Biomed Res 30(5):148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elgeidi A, Elganainy AE, Abou Elkhier N, Rakha S (2014) Interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop 38(12):2591–2595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Honsawek S, Deepaisarnsakul B, Tanavalee A, Sakdinakiattikoon M, Ngarmukos S, Preativatanyou K, Bumrungpanichthaworn P (2011) Relationship of serum IL-6, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and knee skin temperature after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Int Orthop 35(1):31–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, Spangehl M, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Steckelberg J, Osmon D (2010) Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(11):2102–2109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfitzner T, Krocker D, Perka C, Matziolis G (2008) C-reactive protein. An independent risk factor for the development of infection after primary arthroplasty. Orthopade 37(11):1116–1120

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Radtke K, Tetzlaff T, Vaske B, Ettinger M, Claaßen L, Flörkemeier T, Windhagen H, Gv Lewinski (2016) Arthroplasty-center related retrospective analysis of risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after primary and after revision total hip arthroplasty. Technol Health Care 24(5):721–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Frank RM, Cross MB, Della Valle CJ (2015) Periprosthetic joint infection: modern aspects of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. J Knee Surg 28(2):105–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rezapoor M, Parvizi J (2015) Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 30(6):902–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Windisch.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty at the Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena, Germany (Decision Number 4797-05/16).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no founding source.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Windisch, C., Brodt, S., Roehner, E. et al. C-reactive protein course during the first 5 days after total knee arthroplasty cannot predict early prosthetic joint infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 1115–1119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2709-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2709-8

Keywords

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)
  • C-reactive protein (CRP)
  • Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)