Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is the evaluation of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) in the AP pelvis possible? Analysis of conventional X-rays and 3D-CT reconstructions

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A hypertrophic AIIS has been identified as a cause for extraarticular hip impingement and is classified according to Hetsroni using 3D-CT reconstructions. The role of the conventional AP pelvis X-ray, which is the first standard imaging step for the evaluation of hip pain, has not been investigated yet.

Materials and methods

AP pelvis X-rays and 3D-CT reconstructions of patients were evaluated regarding their morphology of the AIIS. The conventional X-rays were categorized into three groups according to the projection of the AIIS: above (A) or below (B) the acetabular sourcil or even exceeding the anterior acetabular rim (C). They were compared to the morphologic types in the 3D-CT reconstruction (Hetsroni type I-III).

Results

Ninety patients with an equal distribution of type A, B or C projection in the AP pelvis were evaluated and compared to the morphology in the 3D-CT reconstruction. The projection of the AIIS below the acetabular sourcil (B + C) showed only moderate sensitivity (0.76) and specificity (0.64) for a hypertrophic AIIS (Hetsroni type II + III), but if the AIIS exceeds the anterior rim, all cases showed a hypertrophic AIIS in the 3D-CT reconstructions (Hetsroni type II + III).

Conclusions

Distinct differentiation of the AIIS morphology in the AP pelvis is not possible, but the projection of the AIIS below the anterior acetabular rim represented a hypertrophic AIIS in all cases and should, therefore, be critically investigated for a relevant AIIS impingement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amar E, Warschawski Y, Sharfman ZT, Martin HD, Safran MR et al (2015) Pathological findings in patients with low anterior inferior iliac spine impingement. Surg Radiol Anat. doi:10.1007/s00276-015-1591-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolus NE (2013) NCRP report 160 and what it means for medical imaging and nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med Technol 41:255–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidovitch RI, DelSole EM, Vigdorchik JM (2016) Subspine impingement: 2 case reports of a previously unreported cause of instability in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 26:e24–e29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Della Valle CJ (2013) Instructional course lectures: Hip 2 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

  5. Hetsroni I, Larson CM, Dela Torre K, Zbeda RM, Magennis E et al (2012) Anterior inferior iliac spine deformity as an extra-articular source for hip impingement: a series of 10 patients treated with arthroscopic decompression. Arthroscopy 28:1644–1653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hetsroni I, Poultsides L, Bedi A, Larson CM, Kelly BT (2013) Anterior inferior iliac spine morphology correlates with hip range of motion: a classification system and dynamic model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2497–2503

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hufeland M, Hartwig T, Krüger D, Perka C, Haas NP et al (2013) Arthroscopic correction of extra-articular subspinal impingement in the hip joint. Orthopade 42:879–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hufeland M, Krüger D, Haas NP, Perka C, Schröder JH (2016) Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement shows persistent clinical improvement in the mid-term. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:687–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Irving MH (1964) Exostosis formation after traumatic avulsion of the anterior inferior iliac spine. report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 46:720–722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) (2016) Jahresbericht 2016 des TraumaRegister DGU®. Retrieved from http://www.traumanetzwerk-dgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/alle_webseiten/docs/2016_Jahresbericht_TraumaRegister_DGU_2015.pdf

  11. Larson CM, Kelly BT, Stone RM (2011) Making a case for anterior inferior iliac spine/subspine hip impingement: three representative case reports and proposed concept. Arthroscopy 27:1732–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson CM, Giveans MR, Samuelson KM, Stone RM, Bedi A (2014) Arthroscopic hip revision surgery for residual femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): surgical outcomes compared with a matched cohort after primary arthroscopic FAI correction. Am J Sports Med 42:1785–1790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lerch TD, Steppacher SD, Liechti EF, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M (2016) Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: indications, technique and results 30 years after the first description. Orthopade 45:687–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross JR, Nepple JJ, Philippon MJ, Kelly BT, Larson CM et al (2014) Effect of changes in pelvic tilt on range of motion to impingement and radiographic parameters of acetabular morphologic characteristics. Am J Sports Med 42:2402–2409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R (2003) Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:241–248

  16. Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA (2013) Atypical hip impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W437–W442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis–what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1540–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tannast M, Pfannebecker P, Schwab JM, Albers CE, Siebenrock KA et al (2012) Pelvic morphology differs in rotation and obliquity between developmental dysplasia of the hip and retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3297–3305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Werner CML, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Turen CH et al (2010) Radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion: correlation of the cross-over sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign. Acta Orthop Belg 76:166–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhuo H, Wang X, Liu X, Song GY, Li Y et al (2015) Quantitative evaluation of residual bony impingement lesions after arthroscopic treatment for isolated pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement using three-dimensional CT. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:1123–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joerg H. Schroeder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local institutional review board (EA1/253/15).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krueger, D.R., Windler, M., Geßlein, M. et al. Is the evaluation of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) in the AP pelvis possible? Analysis of conventional X-rays and 3D-CT reconstructions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 975–980 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2694-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2694-y

Keywords

Navigation