Abstract
Introduction
Patellar tendon donor site has been previously evaluated in patients with auto-graft bone–tendon–bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either magnetic resonance imaging or B mode ultrasound. However, donor site patellar tendon strain ratio—reflecting structural features—has not been studied with US elastography. Here, we ascertain real-time elastography properties of patellar tendon donor site and clinical relevance of these properties in patients with auto-graft BTB ACL reconstruction in the postoperative period.
Methods
Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using BTB autograft were evaluated. Demographic, operative and clinical data (severity of pain, Lysholm Knee score, sit to stand test, packages/year for smoking amount) were noted. Patellar tendons of the operated knees were evaluated by ultrasound (length and thickness) and sonoelastography (strain ratio). The healthy knees of the patients constituted the control group.
Results
Eighteen patients (17 M, 1 F; mean age 30.9 ± 7 years) were evaluated. Mean postoperative follow-up period was 22.1 ± 2.6 (range 18–26) months. Patellar tendons were shorter and thicker on the operated side when compared with the contralateral side (both p = 0.001). Patellar tendon strain ratios of the operated side were lower than the contralateral side (harder tendon on operated side). While there was no correlation between strain ratios and clinical variables (age, BMI, postoperative time, severity of pain, Lysholm score, all p values > 0.05), significant negative correlations were detected between strain ratios of proximal, middle and distal thirds of operated side and amount of smoking (p = 0.008, r = −0.607, p = 0.009, r = −0.598, p = 0.023, r = −0.533, respectively).
Conclusion
Patellar tendons on the operated sides seemed to thicken and shorten with decreased strain ratios at the donor side compared to the healthy side at an average of 2-year follow-up in patients with ACL reconstruction using BTB autograft, and amount of smoking had negative relationship with strain ratio of donor patellar tendon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown J, Carson EW (1999) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Sports Med 18(1):109–171
Kannus P, Järvinen M (1987) Conservatively treated tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(7):1007–1012
Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burstein AL, Warren RF (1993) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21(6):818–823
Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Andrish JT (1987) A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 15(3):225–229
Kartus J, Magnusson L, Stener S, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1999) Complications following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 2–5-year follow-up of 604 patients with special emphasis on anterior knee pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(1):2–8
Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K et al (2006) Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med 34(5):721–732
Bernicker JP, Haddad JL, Lintner DM, DiLiberti TC, Bocell JR (1998) Patellar tendon defect during the first year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: appearance on serial magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 14(8):804–809
Kartus J, Movin T, Papadogiannakis N, Christensen LR, Lindahl S, Karlsson J (2000) A radiographic and histologic evaluation of the patellar tendon after harvesting its central third. Am J Sports Med 28(2):218–226
Pang BSF, Ying M (2006) Sonographic measurement of achilles tendons in asymptomatic subjects: variation with age, body height, and dominance of ankle. J Ultrasound Med 25(10):1291–1296
Järvelä T, Paakkala T, Kannus P, Toivanen J, Järvinen M (2004) Ultrasonographic and power Doppler evaluation of the patellar tendon 10 years after harvesting its central third for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of patients without or with anterior knee pain. Am J Sports Med 32(1):39–46
Wiley JP, Bray RC, Wiseman DA, Elliott PD, Ladly KO, Vale LA (1997) Serial ultrasonographic imaging evaluation of the patellar tendon after harvesting its central one third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Ultrasound Med 16(4):251–255
Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR (2010) Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 14(3):323–333
Wu CH, Chang KV, Mio S, Chen WS, Wang TG (2011) Sonoelastography of the plantar fascia. Radiology 259(2):502–507
De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS (2009) Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(2):134–138
Schoderbek RJ, Treme GP, Miller MD (2007) Bone-patella tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26(4):525–547
Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, Cambier D, Vanderstraeten G (2000) Intrinsic risk factors for the development of anterior knee pain in an athletic population. A two-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med 28(4):480–489
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res Sept 198:43–49
Tveter AT, Dagfinrud H, Moseng T, Holm I (2014) Health-related physical fitness measures: reference values and reference equations for use in clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95(7):1366–1373
Svensson M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Lindahl S, Karlsson J (2004) Does the patellar tendon normalize after harvesting its central third?: A prospective long-term MRI study. Am J Sports Med 32(1):34–38
Tohyama H, Yasuda K, Kitamura Y, Yamamoto E, Hayashi K (2003) The changes in mechanical properties of regenerated and residual tissues in the patellar tendon after removal of its central portion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18(18):765–772
Sanchis-Alfonso V, Subías-López A, Monteagudo-Castro C, Roselló-Sastre E (1999) Healing of the patellar tendon donor defect created after central-third patellar tendon autograft harvest. A long-term histological evaluation in the lamb model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(6):340–348
Adriani E, Mariani PP, Maresca G, Santori N (1995) Healing of the patellar tendon after harvesting of its mid-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and evolution of the unclosed donor site defect. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(3):138–143
Brandsson S, Faxén E, Eriksson BI et al (1998) Closing patellar tendon defects after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: absence of any benefit. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(2):82–87
Järvelä T, Paakkala T, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2001) The incidence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis and associated findings 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 29(1):18–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akkaya, S., Akkaya, N., Agladıoglu, K. et al. Real-time elastography of patellar tendon in patients with auto-graft bone–tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 837–842 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2459-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2459-z