Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The efficacy of open partial aponeurectomy for recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture

  • Handsurgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the efficacy of open partial aponeurectomy for recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture.

Methods

Eighteen patients with recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture of 22 fingers were retrospectively assessed with a mean follow-up time of 94 months (range: 70–114 months). Examination parameters included the determination of range of motion (ROM), grip strength, pain and subjective outcome (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire).

Surgical technique

Dissection with special regard to former skin incision and expected wound defect. Modified incisions after Bruner (Mini-Bruner incisions) were facilitated. Dissection started at the palm. Fibrous tissue was resected proximally within the palm including vertical fibrotic septae. Direct preparation of the neurovascular bundles (NVB) was facilitated from proximal to distal. If the anatomy of the neurovascular structures became unclear around the natatory ligament preparation of the NVB at the distal end of the fibrous cord was performed. After complete preparation of a NVB, dissection was continued from medial to lateral until the other bundle was completely released. Transposition flaps and skin transplants were often used for sufficient wound closure.

Results

Recurrence rate was 36 % applying the definition of van Rijssen et al. Fifteen patients had a grip strength of 90 % or higher in comparison to the contralateral side. Ten patients had a pinch strength of 90 % or higher in comparison to the contralateral side. All patients except for one had pain reduction or none postoperatively. Fifteen patients had a DASH score of 15 or lower (range: 0–47). An unrelated ray amputation was suffered due to wound healing complications.

Conclusions

Open partial aponeurectomy performed by a board certified hand surgeon proved to be safe. The postoperative functional outcome seemed to be related to the individual course of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crean SM, Gerber RA, Le Graverand Hellio MP et al (2011) The efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture in European patients: a structured review of published studies. J Hand Surg Eur 36(5):396–407. doi:10.1177/1753193410397971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Foucher G, Cornil C, Lenoble E et al (1995) A modified open palm technique for Dupuytren’s disease. Short and long term results in 54 patients. Int Orthop 19(5):285–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Degreef I, de Smet L (2011) Risk factors in Dupuytren’s diathesis: is recurrence after surgery predictable? Acta Orthop Belg 77(1):27–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eaton C (2014) Evidence-based medicine: dupuytren contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(5):1241–1251. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dias JJ, Singh HP, Ullah A et al (2013) Patterns of recontracture after surgical correction of Dupuytren disease. J Hand Surg Am 38(10):1987–1993. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.05.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Werker PM, Pess GM, van Rijssen AL et al (2012) Correction of contracture and recurrence rates of Dupuytren contracture following invasive treatment: the importance of clear definitions. J Hand Surg Am 37(10):2095–2105. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kan HJ, Verrijp FW, Huisstede Bionka M A et al (2013) The consequences of different definitions for recurrence of Dupuytren’s disease. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(1):95–103. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2012.08.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hueston JT (1982) The table top test. Hand 14(1):100–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hohendorff B, Biber F, Sauer H et al (2016) Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of fingers in surgical treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture. Oper Orthop Traumatol 28(1):4–11. doi:10.1007/s00064-015-0427-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spies CK, Müller LP, Skouras E et al (2016) Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren’s disease. Oper Orthop Traumatol 28(1):12–19. doi:10.1007/s00064-015-0417-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arora R, Kaiser P, Kastenberger T et al (2016) Injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum as a nonsurgical treatment for Dupuytren’s disease. Oper Orthop Traumatol 28(1):30–37. doi:10.1007/s00064-015-0434-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hohendorff B, Spies CK, Müller LP et al (2015) Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim S, Lautenbach M, Millrose M et al (2013) Morbus Dupuytren. Obere Extremität 8(4):198–204. doi:10.1007/s11678-013-0232-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siemers F (2015) Alternativen zur autologen Nerventransplantation. Obere Extremität 10(3):162–167. doi:10.1007/s11678-015-0331-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walle L, Hohendorff B, Pillukat T et al (2016) The lateral-dorsal transposition flap for closure of a palmar soft tissue defect of the proximal phalanx on the little finger after limited fasciectomy in recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture. Oper Orthop Traumatol 28(1):38–46. doi:10.1007/s00064-012-0211-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lukas B, Lukas M (2016) Flap plasty in advanced Dupuytren’s disease. Oper Orthop Traumatol 28(1):20–29. doi:10.1007/s00064-015-0435-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siepe P, Richter M (2013) Der Thenarlappen—eine sichere Methode zur Deckung von Hautdefekten im Hohlhandbereich. Obere Extremität 8(4):191–196. doi:10.1007/s11678-013-0235-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dailiana ZH, Bougioukli S, Varitimidis S et al (2014) Tumors and tumor-like lesions mimicking carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(1):139–144. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1901-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung K, Walley KC, Rozental TD (2015) Management of complications of Dupuytren contracture. Hand Clin 31(2):345–354. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2015.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Volkmer E, Pototschnig A, Spanholtz T et al (2013) Minimal-invasive Verfahren zur Behandlung des Morbus Dupuytren. Obere Extremität 8(4):205–211. doi:10.1007/s11678-013-0233-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gosk J, Gutkowska O, Urban M et al (2015) Benign nerve tumours of the hand (excluding wrist). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(12):1763–1769. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2327-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Salhi S, Cardin-Langlois E, Luc M (2011) Percutaneous fasciotomy for the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease-a systematic review. Hand (N Y) 6(4):349–355. doi:10.1007/s11552-011-9355-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foucher G, Medina J, Navarro R (2003) Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy: complications and results. J Hand Surg Br 28(5):427–431. doi:10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00013-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mühldorfer-Fodor M, Ziegler S, Harms C et al (2014) Grip force monitoring on the hand: manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(8):1179–1188. doi:10.1007/s00402-014-2027-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fess EE (1992) Grip strength. In: Casanova JS (ed) Clinical assessment recommendations, 2nd edn. Am Soc Hand Ther, Chicago, pp 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29(6):602–608. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van Rijssen AL, Werker PM (2006) Percutaneous needle fasciotomy in dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Br 31(5):498–501. doi:10.1016/J.JHSB.2006.03.174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Felici N, Marcoccio I, Giunta R et al (2014) Dupuytren contracture recurrence project: reaching consensus on a definition of recurrence. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 46(6):350–354. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1394420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Denkler K (2010) Surgical complications associated with fasciectomy for dupuytren’s disease: a 20-year review of the English literature. Eplasty 10:e15

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Peimer CA, Blazar P, Coleman S et al (2015) Dupuytren Contracture Recurrence Following Treatment With Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CORDLESS [Collagenase Option for Reduction of Dupuytren Long-Term Evaluation of Safety Study]): 5-Year Data. J Hand Surg Am 40(8):1597–1605. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian K. Spies.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spies, C.K., Hahn, P., Müller, L.P. et al. The efficacy of open partial aponeurectomy for recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 881–889 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2448-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2448-2

Keywords

Navigation