Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel method to measure femoral component migration by computed tomography: a cadaver study

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the most accurate technique to measure implant migration. However, it requires special equipment, technical expertise and analysis software and has not gained wide acceptance. The current paper analyzes a novel method to measure implant migration utilizing widely available computer tomography (CT).

Methods

Three uncemented total hip replacements were performed in three human cadavers and six tantalum beads were inserted into the femoral bone similar to RSA. Six different 28 mm heads (−3, 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mm) were added to simulate five reproducible translations (maximum total point migration) of the center of the head. Implant migration was measured in a 3-D analysis software (Geomagic Studio 7). Repeat manual reconstructions of the center of the head were performed by two investigators to determine repeatability and accuracy.

Results

The accuracy of measurements between the centers of two head sizes was 0.11 mm with a CI 95 % of 0.22 mm. The intra-observer repeatability was 0.13 mm (CI 95 % 0.25 mm). The interrater-reliability was 0.943.

Conclusion

CT based measurement of head displacement in a cadaver model were highly accurate and reproducible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeman MAR P-B (1994) Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prosteses. J Bone Jt Surg Br 76(3):432–438

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kiran A, Bottomley N, Biant LC, Javaid MK, Carr AJ, Cooper C, Field RE, Murray DW, Price A, Beard DJ, Arden NK (2015) Variations in good patient reported outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.039

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, Malchau H, Nivbrant B, Thanner J (1997) Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:94–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker PSMS, Cobb AG, Bentley G, Hua J (1995) Prediction of clinical outcome of THR from migration measurements on standard radiographs. J Bone Jt Surg Br 77:705–714

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M, Plevier JW, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER (2012) Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survival studies. Acta Orthop 83(6):583–591. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.745353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bojan AJ, Bragdon C, Jonsson A, Ekholm C, Karrholm J (2015) Three-dimensional bone-implant movements in trochanteric hip fractures: precision and accuracy of radiostereometric analysis in a phantom model. J Orthop Res. doi:10.1002/jor.22822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karrholm J, Gill RH, Valstar ER (2006) The history and future of radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:10–21. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000224001.95141.fe

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Weidenhielm L, Noz ME, Kardos J, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Aspelin P (2008) A new technique for diagnosis of acetabular cup loosening using computed tomography: preliminary experience in 10 patients. Acta Orthop 79(3):346–353. doi:10.1080/17453670710015247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrone L, Noz ME, Maguire JR, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Jonson T (2003) Spatial component position in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Radiol 44:84–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Olivecrona L, Crafoord J, Olivecrona H, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Weidenhielm L (2002) Acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using ct and a semiautomated program for volume merging. Acta Radiol 43:517–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ranstam J, Ryd L, Önsten I (2000) Accurate accuracy assessment. Acta Orthop Scand 71(1):106–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iannotti JP, Balderston RA, Booth RE, Rothman RH, Cohn JC, Pickens G (1986) Aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. Incidence, clinical significance, and etiology. J Arthroplast 1(2):99–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nunn DFM, Hill PF, Evans SJW (1989) The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Jt Surg Br 71:629–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutherland CJ, Bresina SJ (1992) Measurement of acetabular component migration using two-dimensional radiography. J Arthroplast 7(Suppl):377–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wetherell RGAA, Heatley FW (1989) Measurement of Acetabular erosion. J Bone Jt Surg Br 71:447–451

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips NJ, Stockley I, Wilkinson JM (2002) Direct plain radiographic methods versus EBRA-Digital for measuring implant migration after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17(7):917–925. doi:10.1054/arth.2002.34529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dominkus M, Wanivenhaus AH, Morscher M, Powell G, Krismer M, Wolfl G (1998) Different cup migration in rheumatoid arthritis and arthrosis: a radiographic analysis of 127 uncemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5):455–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendrich CBJ, Eulert J (1997) Migration of the uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular cup. J Arthroplast 12(8):889–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ilchmann TML, Joshi A, Hardinge K, Murphy J, Wingstrand H (1998) Migration and wear of long-term successful Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80(3):377–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krismer MBR, Stöckl B, Fischer M, Bauer R, Haid C (1999) The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. J Bone Jt Surg Br 81:273–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Krismer M, Fischer M, Mayrhofer P, Stockl F, Bittner C, Trojer C, Stockl B (1994) A prospective study of the migration of two acetabular components PCA versus RM cups. Int Orthop 18(1):23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roffman M, Kligman M (1999) Cementless coated and noncoated Mathys acetabular cups: radiographic and histologic evaluation. Orthopedics 22(1):39–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Biedermann R, Krismer M, Stöckl B, Mayrhofer P, Ornstein E, Franzen H (1999) Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 81:266–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krismer MBR, Tschupik J, Mayrhofer P (1995) EBRA: a Method to measure migration of acetabular components. J Biomech 28(10):1225–1236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Selvik G (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand 60(Sup232):1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hauptfleisch JSG-J, Beard DJ, Gill HS, Murray DW (2006) The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:179–183. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ioppolo J, Borlin N, Bragdon C, Li M, Price R, Wood D, Malchau H, Nivbrant B (2007) Validation of a low-dose hybrid RSA and fluoroscopy technique: determination of accuracy, bias and precision. J Biomech 40(3):686–692. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Malchau HPH (2008) How are wear-related problems diagnosed and what forms of surveillance are necessary? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jedenmalm A, Noz ME, Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Stark A (2008) A new approach for assessment of wear in metal-backed acetabular cups using computed tomography: a phantom study with retrievals. Acta orthopaedica 79(2):218–224. doi:10.1080/17453670710015003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goldvasser D, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Olivecrona H, Bragdon CR, Malchau H (2012) A new technique for measuring wear in total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. J Arthroplast 27(9):1636–1640. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.053 (e1631)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karrholm J (1994) Does early micromotion of femoral protheses matter? J Bone Jt Surg Br 76:912–991

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Boettner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boettner, F., Sculco, P., Lipman, J. et al. A novel method to measure femoral component migration by computed tomography: a cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 857–863 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2442-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2442-8

Keywords

Navigation