Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective clinical and radiostereometric analysis of the Fitmore short-stem total hip arthroplasty

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Uncemented short, curved femoral stems may help save proximal bone stock during total hip arthroplasty (THA) and facilitate insertion in minimal invasive surgery. The aim of this 2 year, prospective, single-center study was to examine the stability and migration of the Fitmore® stem in THA using model-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and thus predict the implant’s long-term survival. In addition, we evaluated the stem’s clinical performance using standard clinical measures.

Patients and methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 34 THA patients who received the short Fitmore Hip Stem (Zimmer, Winterthur, Switzerland). At 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively, the patients underwent clinical evaluation and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to measure stem migration.

Results

RSA analysis revealed a mean subsidence of −0.39 mm (95 % CI −0.60 to −0.18) at 3 months with no further migration after 2 years. Mean internal rotation along the longitudinal axis was 1.09° (95 % CI 0.52–1.66) at 2 years, versus 0.85° (95 % CI 0.44–1.26) at 3 months. The Harris hip score improved from 60 (range 30–80) preoperatively to 99 (range 83–100) after 2 years. Three patients underwent revision due to deep infection, non-specific thigh pain and aseptic loosening in one case.

Conclusion

We conclude that the Fitmore Hip Stem stabilizes after 3 months and achieves good short-term clinical results in most cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aro HT, Alm JJ, Moritz N et al (2012) Low BMD affects initial stability and delays stem osseointegration in cementless total hip arthroplasty in women: a 2-year RSA study of 39 patients. Acta Orthop 83:107–114

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S et al (1979) The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 95:47–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bieger R, Ignatius A, Decking R et al (2012) Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boe BG, Rohrl SM, Heier T et al (2011) A prospective randomized study comparing electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite on titanium stems. Acta Orthop 82:13–19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D et al (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joit Surg BR 80:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Vries LM, Van Der Weegen W, Pilot P et al (2014) The predictive value of radiostereometric analysis for stem survival in total hip arthroplasty. A systematic review. Hip Int 24:215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engh CA, O’connor D, Jasty M et al (1992) Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:13–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Floerkemeier T, Budde S, Gronewold J et al (2015) Short-stem hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:715–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freitag T, Hein MA, Wernerus D et al. (2015) Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study. Arch orthop trauma surg [Epub ahead of print]

  10. Freitag T, Kappe T, Fuchs M et al (2014) Migration pattern of a femoral short-stem prosthesis: a 2-year EBRA-FCA-study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1003–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gotze C, Steens W, Vieth V et al (2002) Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gruen TA, Mcneice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gustke K (2012) Short stems for total hip arthroplasty: initial experience with the Fitmore stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94:47–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 51:737–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurschler C, Seehaus F, Emmerich J et al (2008) Accuracy of model-based RSA contour reduction in a typical clinical application. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1978–1986

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jahnke A, Engl S, Seeger JB et al (2015) Influences of fit and fill following hip arthroplasty using a cementless short-stem prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:1609–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D et al (1997) In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:707–714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G et al (1994) Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4–7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:912–917

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krismer M, Biedermann R, Stockl B et al (1999) The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:273–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loudon JR, Charnley J (1980) Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62-B:450–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mjoberg B (1994) Theories of wear and loosening in hip prostheses. Wear-induced loosening vs loosening-induced wear–a review. Acta Orthop Scand 65:361–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nunn D, Freeman MA, Tanner KE et al (1989) Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:452–455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel RM, Smith MC, Woodward CC et al (2012) Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:442–449

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pepke W, Nadorf J, Ewerbeck V et al (2014) Primary stability of the Fitmore stem: biomechanical comparison. Int Orthop 38:483–488

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M et al (2012) Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survival studies. Acta Orthop 83:583–591

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranstam J, Ryd L, Onsten I (2000) Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 71:106–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rohrl SM, Li MG, Pedersen E et al (2006) Migration pattern of a short femoral neck preserving stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448:73–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rottinger H (2010) Minimally invasive anterolateral approach for total hip replacement (OCM technique). Oper Orthop Traumatol 22:421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L et al (1995) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:377–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Soballe K, Hansen ES, H BR et al (1992) Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 10:285–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Swanson TV (2005) The tapered press fit total hip arthroplasty: a European alternative. J Arthroplasty 20:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L et al (2005) Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 76:563–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Oldenrijk J, Molleman J, Klaver M et al (2014) Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies. Acta Orthop 85:250–258

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolf O, Mattsson P, Milbrink J et al (2010) Periprosthetic bone mineral density and fixation of the uncemented CLS stem related to different weight bearing regimes: a randomized study using DXA and RSA in 38 patients followed for 5 years. Acta Orthop 81:286–291

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Bart Kaptein and Lennard Koster for the RSA analysis and for technical support, and Tina Stölzle for general study support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves P. Acklin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding sources

This study received financial support for statistic and RSA analysis from Zimmer GmbH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Acklin, Y.P., Jenni, R., Bereiter, H. et al. Prospective clinical and radiostereometric analysis of the Fitmore short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 277–284 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2401-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2401-9

Keywords

Navigation