Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is surgical treatment better than conservative treatment for primary patellar dislocations? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite several randomized controlled trials comparing operative to nonoperative management of primary patellar dislocation, the optimal management of this condition remains a subject of controversy. The aim of this study was to compare surgical to conservative treatment of outcomes for primary patellar dislocation by meta-analysis all the relative randomized controlled trials.

Study design

Meta-analysis.

Methods

After searching multiple online databases (MEDILINE, EMBASE, CLINICAL, OVID, BISOS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials), eight randomized controlled trials including 430 patients were meta-analyzed in which operative treatment was compared with non-operative treatment for primary patellar dislocation. Outcomes evaluated were redislocation rate, Kujala score, episode of instability, Tegner activity score, Hughston visual analog score (VAS) and patient satisfaction.

Results

Outcomes on recurrent patellar dislocation (P = 0.004) and Hughston VAS (P = 0.03) were statistically significant in favor of operative management. Tegner activity score (P < 0.00001) was significantly higher in favor of conservative treatment, though only a few studies were identified. There was no significant difference between the two treatments regarding episode of instability (P = 0.41), Kujala score (P = 0.32) or patient satisfaction (P = 0.49).

Conclusion

Surgical treatment may be better than conservative treatment for patients with primary patellar dislocation on incidence of redislocation. However, since these findings are built on a limited number of studies available, well-designed, multicenter clinical trials with long-term follow-up are required to provide more solid evidence concerning optimal strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nietosvaara Y, Aalto K, Kallio PE (1994) Acute patellar dislocation in children: incidence and associated osteochondral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 14(4):513–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramov M, Stock H (2013) Lateral patellar dislocation: mechanism of disease, radiographic presentation, and management. Conn Med 77(4):235–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hawkins RJ, Bell RH, Anisette G (1986) Acute patellar dislocations. The natural history. Am J Sports Med 14(2):117–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maenpaa H, Huhtala H, Lehto MU (1997) Recurrence after patellar dislocation. Redislocation in 37/75 patients followed for 6–24 years. Acta Orthop Scand 68(5):424–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mariani PP et al (2011) Arthroscopic patellar reinsertion of the MPFL in acute patellar dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(4):628–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Camanho GL et al (2009) Conservative versus surgical treatment for repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament in acute dislocations of the patella. Arthroscopy 25(6):620–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchner M et al (2005) Acute traumatic primary patellar dislocation: long-term results comparing conservative and surgical treatment. Clin J Sport Med 15(2):62–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikku R et al (2005) Operative treatment of primary patellar dislocation does not improve medium-term outcome—a 7-year follow-up report and risk analysis of 127 randomized patients. Acta Orthopaedica 76(5):699–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christiansen SE et al (2008) Isolated repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament in primary dislocation of the patella: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 24(8):881–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nikku R et al (2005) Operative treatment of primary patellar dislocation does not improve medium-term outcome: a 7-year follow-up report and risk analysis of 127 randomized patients. Acta Orthop 76(5):699–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmu S et al (2008) Acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90A(3):463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith TO et al (2011) Operative versus non-operative management of patellar dislocation. A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(6):988–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hing CB et al (2011) Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008106

  14. Regalado G et al (2014) Six-year outcome after non-surgical versus surgical treatment of acute primary patellar dislocation in adolescents: a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3271-3

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petri M et al (2013) Operative vs conservative treatment of traumatic patellar dislocation: results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(2):209–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bitar AC et al (2012) Traumatic patellar dislocation: nonoperative treatment compared with MPFL reconstruction using patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 40(1):114–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sillanpaa PJ et al (2009) Treatment with and without initial stabilizing surgery for primary traumatic patellar dislocation a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91A(2):263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nikku R et al (1997) Operative versus closed treatment of primary dislocation of the patella. Similar 2-year results in 125 randomized patients. Acta Orthop Scand 68(5):419–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maher CG et al (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83(8):713–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liberati A et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–e34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sallay PI et al (1996) Acute dislocation of the patella. A correlative pathoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med 24(1):52–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Conlan T, Garth WP Jr, Lemons JE (1993) Evaluation of the medial soft-tissue restraints of the extensor mechanism of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(5):682–693

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Balcarek P et al (2012) MRI but not arthroscopy accurately diagnoses femoral MPFL injury in first-time patellar dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1575–1580

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tegner Y et al (1986) A performance test to monitor rehabilitation and evaluate anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 14(2):156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sillanpaa PJ et al (2009) Treatment with and without initial stabilizing surgery for primary traumatic patellar dislocation. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(2):263–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maenpaa H, Lehto MU (1996) Patellar dislocation has predisposing factors. A roentgenographic study on lateral and tangential views in patients and healthy controls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4(4):212–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fithian DC et al (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 32(5):1114–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Atkin DM et al (2000) Characteristics of patients with primary acute lateral patellar dislocation and their recovery within the first 6 months of injury. Am J Sports Med 28(4):472–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding support

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 81272052).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Sn., Qin, Ch., Jiang, N. et al. Is surgical treatment better than conservative treatment for primary patellar dislocations? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 371–379 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2382-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2382-8

Keywords

Navigation