Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Graft tensioning practices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Australia: a national survey

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The application of graft tension during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is considered an important feature of ACLR. However, wide variation exists in relation to graft tensioning practice limiting the ability to determine the best approach. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to describe current clinical practice amongst Australian orthopaedic surgeons with respect to graft tensioning and explore influencing factors.

Materials and methods

A survey was developed to address the aims of the study and pilot testing was completed to confirm validity and reliability. The survey population was defined as Australian orthopaedic surgeons, associated with the Australian Orthopaedic Association sub-specialty of knee to target surgeons likely to perform ACLR. The final sampling frame consisted of 192 surgeons.

Results

Manual tensioning was the most common method (80.5 %), with a maximum one-handed pull the most frequent description and estimated tension ranged between 41 and 60 N with the knee positioned near full extension. Surgeons using a tensioning device tended to use a higher tension (mean 81.85 N), with the knee positioned at 30° flexion (40 %). Sixteen percent reported individualising tension on viscoelasticity of the graft, graft diameter, patient anthropometry and age. Patient outcomes and available evidence were the primary factors influencing tensioning protocol.

Conclusion

Tensioning practices appear to consist of three main approaches, (1) manual tension using a sustained maximum one-handed pull, with tension estimated as 41–60 N, applied near full extension, (2) tensioning device, mean tension of 81.85 N, at 30° knee flexion, (3) individual approach based on size and viscoelastic properties of the graft, patient anthropometry, contralateral comparison to the other knee and age of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dargel J, Gotter M, Mader K, Pennig D, Koebke J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R (2007) Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament and implications for surgical reconstruction. Strat Trauma Limb Reconstr 2(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekdahl M, Wang JH, Ronga M, Fu FH (2008) Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(10):935–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woo SL, Wu C, Dede O, Vercillo F, Noorani S (2006) Biomechanics and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg Res 1:2. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-1-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson D, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to surgical technique and rehabilitation: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy J Arthrosc Relat Surg 25(6):653–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, Ejerhed L, Zaffagnini S, Ropke M, Nizard R (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2470–2478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis PB, Parameswaran AD, Rue JPH, Bach BR (2008) Systematic review of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes—A baseline assessment for consideration of double-bundle techniques. Am J Sports Med 36(10):2028–2036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohtadi NGH, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005960.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Delince P, Ghafil D (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(1):48–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kessler MA, Behrend H, Henz S, Stutz G, Rukavina A, Kuster MS (2008) Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(5):442–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boylan D, Greis P, West J, Bachus K, Burks R (2003) Effects of initial graft tension on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a cadaveric study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 19:700–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heis FT, Paulos LE (2002) Tensioning of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. Orthop Clin North Am 33(4):697–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sherman SL, Chalmers PN, Yanke AB, Bush-Joseph CA, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr (2012) Graft tensioning during knee ligament reconstruction: principles and practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(10):633–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arneja S, McConkey MO, Mulpuri K, Chin P, Gilbart MK, Regan WD, Leith JM (2009) Graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 25(2):200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirwan GW, Bourke MG, Chipchase L, Dalton PA, Russell TG (2013) Initial graft tension and the effect on postoperative patient functional outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29(5):934–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleming BC, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, Shalvoy RM, Oksendahl HL, Badger GJ, Tung GA (2013) The effect of initial graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a randomized clinical trial with 36-month follow-up. Am J Sports Med 41(1):25–34

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim S, Kurosawa H, Sakuraba H, Ikeda H, Takazawa S (2006) The effect of initial graft tension on postoperative clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with smitendinosus tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicholas SJ, D’Amato MJ, Mullaney MJ, Tyler TF, Kolstad K, McHugh MP (2004) A prospectively randomized double-blind study on the effect of initial graft tension on knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(8):1881–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Kampen A, Wymenga A, van der Heide H (1998) The effect of different graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomised study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 14:845–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1997) Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Autogenous double-hamstring tendons connected in series with polyester tapes. Am J Sports Med 25:99–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M, Ouchi K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K (2002) Graft tension and knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394(January):154–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Amis AA, Jakob RP (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:S2–S12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cunningham R, West JR, Greis PE, Burks RT (2002) A survey of the tension applied to a double hamstring tendon graft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 18:983–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McRae SM, Chahal J, Leiter JR, Marx RG, MacDonald PB (2011) Survey Study of Members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association on the Natural History and Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Clin J Sport Med 21(3):249–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burks RT, Leland R (1988) Determination of graft tension before fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 4(4):260–266

  25. Aday LA, Cornelius LJ (2006) Designing and conducting health surveys: a comprehensive guide. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  26. Czaja R, Blair J (2005) Designing surveys: a guide to decisions and procedures. 2005, Thousand Oaks. Pine Forge Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dillman DA (1978) Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson CJ, Furnham A (2000) Designing and analysing questionnaires and surveys: a manual for health professionals and administrators. Whurr, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50(10):1129–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Beebe TJ, Rey E, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins S, Lackore K, Talley NJ, Locke RG (2010) Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on response rate and quality. BMC Med Res Methodol 10. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-50

  31. Bonevski B, Magin P, Horton G, Foster M, Girgis A (2011) Response rates in GP surveys: trialling two recruitment strategies. Aust Fam Physician 40(6):427–430

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Griffith LE, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Charles CA (1999) Comparison of open and closed questionnaire formats in obtaining demographic information from Canadian general internists. J Clin Epidemiol 52(10):997–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. VanGeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL (2007) Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians—A systematic review. Eval Health Prof 30(4):303–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kellerman SE, Herold J (2001) Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 20(1):61–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Heywood A, Mudge P, Ring I, Sansonfisher R (1995) Reducing systematic bias in studies of general-practitioners—the use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general-practitioners in research. Fam Pract 12(2):227–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bylski-Austrow DI, Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Holden JP, Butler DL (1990) Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension. J Orthop Res 8(4):522–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pena E, Martinez MA, Calvo B, Palanca D, Doblare M (2005) A finite element simulation of the effect of graft stiffness and graft tensioning in ACL reconstruction. Clin Biomech 20(6):636–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Suggs J, Wang C, Li G (2003) The effect of graft stiffness on knee joint biomechanics after ACL reconstruction–a 3D computational simulation. Clin Biomech 18(1):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fleming B, Beynnon B, Howe J, McLeod W, Pope M (1992) Effect of tension and placement of a prosthetic anterior cruciate ligament on the anteroposterior laxity of the knee. J Orthop Res 10:177–186

  40. Gertel TH, Lew WD, Lewis JL, Stewart NJ, Hunter RE (1993) Effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft tensioning direction, magnitude, and flexion angle on knee biomechanics. Am J Sports Med 21(4):572–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lubowitz JH (2014) Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5):1190–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Arnold MP, Verdonschot N, van Kampen A (2005) The normal anterior cruciate ligament as a model for tensioning strategies in anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med 33(2):277–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lewis JL (1998) Maximum unloaded length (MUL) and graft force as criteria for anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(Supplement 1):25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Giuliodori MJ, Lujan HL, Briggs WS, Palani G, DiCarlo SE (2009) Hooke’s law: applications of a recurring principle. Adv Physiol Educ 33(4):293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kamien PM, Hydrick JM, Replogle WH, Go LT, Barrett GR (2013) Age, graft size, and tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med 41(8):1808–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, Pedroza AD, Jones MH, Andrish JT, Parker RD, Kaeding CC, Magnussen RA (2013) The Influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29(12):1948–1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Brattwall M, Jacobson E, Forssblad M, Jakobsson J (2010) Knee arthroscopy routines and practice. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(12):1656–1660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Fillingham YA, Frank RM, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BRJ, Cole BJ, Verma NN (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 30(6):731–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Feller JA, Cooper R, Webster KE (2002) Current Australian trends in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 9(2):121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hiemstra LA, Veale K, Sasyniuk T (2006) Knee immobilization in the immediate post-operative period following ACL reconstruction—A survey of practice patterns of Canadian orthopedic surgeons. Clin J Sport Med 16(3):199–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kapoor B, Clement DJ, Kirkley A, Maffulli N (2004) Current practice in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the United Kingdom. Br J Sports Med 38(5):542–544

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Marx RG, Jones EC, Angel M, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2003) Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 19(7):762–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mirza F, Mai DD, Kirkley A, Fowler PJ, Amendola A (2000) Management of injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament: results of a survey of orthopaedic surgeons in Canada. Clin J Sport Med 10(2):85–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Petersen W, Zantop T (2013) Return to play following ACL reconstruction: survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (AGA instructors). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(7):969–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiotherapy, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Metro South Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Michael G. Bourke

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Metro South Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Philip A. Dalton

  3. Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Garry W. Kirwan, Michael G. Bourke & Trevor G. Russell

  4. Division of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia

    Garry W. Kirwan

  5. Division of Physiotherapy, School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Lucinda Chipchase

Authors
  1. Garry W. Kirwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael G. Bourke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucinda Chipchase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philip A. Dalton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Trevor G. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garry W. Kirwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirwan, G.W., Bourke, M.G., Chipchase, L. et al. Graft tensioning practices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction amongst orthopaedic surgeons in Australia: a national survey. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 1733–1741 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2335-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2335-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation