Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of a novel extramedullary femoral alignment guide system in primary total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We aimed to assess the accuracy of a new extramedullary guide system for achieving appropriate femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine whether it differed between patients operated on by different surgeons.

Materials and methods

We performed 100 consecutive primary TKAs in 100 patients using a newly developed extramedullary guide, the “S guide”; 50 were performed by author KM at A Hospital, and 50 by author NM at B Hospital. All patients received the Vanguard RP mobile-bearing prosthesis (Biomet Japan, Tokyo, Japan). We assessed the coronal and sagittal alignment of the femoral component with the mechanical axis using plane radiographs. Data were analyzed statistically using Prism 5.0 software, and a p value of <0.05 was regarded as indicating significance.

Results

The mean postoperative coronal alignment angle of the femoral component (α) was 0.1° ± 1.4°, with no significant differences between A Hospital and B Hospital (p = 0.67), and 98 % of patients had an α deviating by less than 3° from the mechanical axis. The mean postoperative sagittal alignment angle of the femoral component (γ) was 1.7° ± 1.7°, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.61), and 86 % of patients had a γ deviating by less than 3° from the mechanical axis.

Conclusions

This study shows that the S-guide is reliable for use in TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laskin RS (2001) The Genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS (2001) Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:10–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G (1988) Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1163–1173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Volz RG (1986) Basic update #2. Biomechanics: lever arm, instant center of motion, moment force, joint reactive force. Orthop Rev 15:677–684

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brys DA, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK (1991) A comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 263:175–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dennis DA, Channer M, Susman MH, Stringer EA (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:43–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Engh GA, Petersen TL (1990) Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeon SH, Kim JH, Lee JM, Seo ES (2012) Efficacy of extramedullary femoral component alignment guide system for blood saving after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 24:99–103

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, McAuley JP, Engh GA (2007) Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1306–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R (1999) Posterior tibial slope in the normal and varus knee. Am J Knee Surg 12:165–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mihalko WM, Krackow KA (1999) Posterior cruciate ligament effects on the flexion space in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 360:243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cates HE, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:32–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jung WH, Chun CW, Lee JH, Ha JH, Jeong JH (2013) The accuracy of the extramedullary and intramedullary femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritic knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:629–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kandel L, Vasili C, Kirsh G (2006) Extramedullary femoral alignment instrumentation reduces blood loss after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 19:256–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fahmy NR, Chandler HP, Danylchuk K, Matta EB, Sunder N, Siliski JM (1990) Blood-gas and circulatory changes during total knee replacement. Role of the intramedullary alignment rod. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:19–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishii Y, Ohmori G, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB (1995) Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 318:167–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC (2005) Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bardakos N, Cil A, Thompson B, Stocks G (2007) Mechanical axis cannot be restored in total knee arthroplasty with a fixed valgus resection angle: a radiographic study. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):85–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22:1097–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):90–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Stegeman TJ, Oussedik S, Coolican MR, Parker DA (2012) Sagittal placement of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty predicts knee flexion contracture at one-year follow-up. Int Orthop 36:1835–1839

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dennis DA, Kim RH, Johnson DR, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Sharma A (2011) Control-matched evaluation of painful patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:10–17

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG, Husted H, Troelsen A (2014) What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop 85:480–487

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krishnan SP, Dawood A, Richards R, Henckel J, Hart AJ (2012) A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1457–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Fennema P (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 96-B:1052–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nam D, Cody EA, Nguyen JT, Figgie MP, Mayman DJ (2014) Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 29(2):288–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Middleton FR, Palmer SH (2007) How accurate is Whiteside’s line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 14(3):204–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazu Matsumoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsumoto, K., Mori, N., Ogawa, H. et al. Accuracy of a novel extramedullary femoral alignment guide system in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 1743–1748 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2318-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2318-3

Keywords

Navigation