Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Isocentric C-arm three-dimensional navigation versus conventional C-arm assisted C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The Isocentric C-arm 3D navigation has been widely used in superior cervical surgeries in recent years. Several clinical researches reported that navigation system was an effective support device for treatment of atlantoaxial instability. But there were few studies about the advantages of navigation system compared to conventional C-arm fluoroscopy in C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability. The aim of the study was to evaluate the precision of computer-assisted C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation (Magerl’s technique) for atlantoaxial instability and compare the clinical results with conventional C-arm fluoroscopy.

Methods

Forty-two patients diagnosed as atlantoaxial instability who underwent C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation under two different fluoroscopy methods were studied. The Iso-C 3D navigation group included 18 patients and the other 24 patients were in the conventional C-arm group. The clinical and radiographic results were recorded and compared between the two groups. Patients were followed up with clinical examination and radiographs at a mean of 18.4 months.

Results

There were no significant differences between two groups in the mean age, gender, and causes of atlantoaxial instability. The mean blood loss in the navigation group was 236.1 ± 28.5 mL versus 308.3 ± 21.2 mL in the conventional C-arm group. The radiation time was significantly reduced using 3D navigation (48.8 ± 1.05 s versus 60.3 ± 2.23 s). Overall, 97.2 % (35/36) of 3D navigated screws and 91.7 % (44/48) of fluoroscopy screws were placed into the C1–C2 transarticular passages. Thirty-nine of forty patients showed evidence of solid fusion after 12 months on cervical plain radiographies or CT scans.

Conclusions

On comparing the two imaging techniques, it was found that using Iso-C 3D navigation can improve accuracy of the C1–C2 transarticular screws, decrease intra-operative fluoroscopic time and blood loss, and not prolong the operative time. This study demonstrates that Iso-C 3D navigation is a safe and effective means of guiding C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Briem D, Linhart W, Lehmann W, Begemann PG, Adam G, Schumacher U et al (2006) Computer-assisted screw insertion into the first sacral vertebra using a three-dimensional image intensifier: results of a controlled experimental investigation. Eur Spine J 15:757–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Citak M, Kendoff D, Kfuri M Jr, Pearle A, Krettek C, Hufner T (2007) Accuracy analysis of Iso-C3D versus fluoroscopy-based navigated retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions: a pilot study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:323–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickman CA, Sonntag VK (1998) Posterior C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. Neurosurgery 43:275–280 (discussion 280–271)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gebhard FT, Kraus MD, Schneider E, Liener UC, Kinzl L, Arand M (2006) Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine 31:2024–2027 (discussion 2028)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gluf WM, Schmidt MH, Apfelbaum RI (2005) Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation: a review of surgical indications, fusion rate, complications, and lessons learned in 191 adult patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, McLaughlin MR, Rodts GE Jr, Wahlig JB Jr (2001) C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability: a 6 year experience. Neurosurgery 49:65–68 (discussion 69–70)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kazan S, Yildirim F, Sindel M, Tuncer R (2000) Anatomical evaluation of the groove for the vertebral artery in the axis vertebrae for atlanto-axial transarticular screw fixation technique. Clin Anat 13:237–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Madawi AA, Casey AT, Solanki GA, Tuite G, Veres R, Crockard HA (1997) Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique. J Neurosurg 86:961–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Magerl F, Seemann P-S (1987) Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation. In: Kehr P, Weidner A (eds) Cervical Spine I. Springer, Wien, pp 322–327

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Martirosyan NL, Kalb S, Cavalcanti DD, Lochhead RA, Uschold TD, Loh A et al (2013) Comparative analysis of isocentric 3-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy and biplanar fluoroscopy for anterior screw fixation in odontoid fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:189–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajasekaran S, Tubaki VR, Shetty AP (2012) Results of direct repair of type 2 hangman fracture using Iso-C3D navigation: 20 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:E134–E139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sim HB, Lee JW, Park JT, Mindea SA, Lim J, Park J (2011) Biomechanical evaluations of various c1–c2 posterior fixation techniques. Spine 36:E401–E407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR (2008) Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med 31:532–537

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Suchomel P, Stulik J, Klezl Z, Chrobok J, Lukas R, Krbec M et al (2004) Transarticular fixation of C1-C2: a multicenter retrospective study. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 71:6–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Summers LE, Kouri JG, Yang M, Patrick Jacob R (2008) Odontoid screw placement using Isocentric 3-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:45–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uehara M, Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, Hashidate H, Ogihara N, Mukaiyama K et al (2012) Computer-assisted C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation “magerl technique” for atlantoaxial instability. Asian Spine J 6:168–177

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang YL, Fu BS, Li RW, Smith PN, Mu WD, Li LX et al (2011) Anterior single screw fixation of odontoid fracture with intraoperative Iso-C 3-dimensional imaging. Eur Spine J 20:1899–1907

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright NM, Lauryssen C (1998) Vertebral artery injury in C1–2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 88:634–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weng C, Tian W, Li ZY, Liu B, Li Q, Wang YQ et al (2012) Surgical management of symptomatic os odontoideum with posterior screw fixation performed using the magerl and harms techniques with intraoperative 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation. Spine 37:1839–1846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang YL, Zhou DS, He JL (2013) Comparison of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement for atlantoaxial instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province under Grant BS2014YY024.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, No. 324, Jingwu Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

      Yongliang Yang, Fu Wang, Yonghui Wang, Jinlei Dong, Lianxin Li & Dongsheng Zhou

    2. Department of Internal Medicine, Shandong Tumor Hospital, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

      Shumei Han

    Authors
    1. Yongliang Yang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Fu Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Shumei Han
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yonghui Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Jinlei Dong
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Lianxin Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Dongsheng Zhou
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Lianxin Li or Dongsheng Zhou.

    Additional information

    Y. Yang and F. Wang contributed equally to the study.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Yang, Y., Wang, F., Han, S. et al. Isocentric C-arm three-dimensional navigation versus conventional C-arm assisted C1–C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 1083–1092 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2249-z

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2249-z

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation