Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What is the fate of clubfoot patients treated by posteromedial release?

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Management and long-term results of operatively treated clubfoot deformity still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological and clinical results of adult clubfoot patients treated with posteromedial release.

Materials and methods

Between 2005 and 2012, we evaluated patients with congenital foot deformities regarding clubfoot who were operatively treated with complete posteromedial release. Out of 320 patients evaluated, 29 patients (40 feet) were included the study. We also included foot radiographies of 40 healthy adults. Talocalcaneal angle on the dorsoplantar projection (TC-DP) and lateral projection (TC-L) and talus–first metatarsal angle on the dorsoplantar projection (TFM-DP) were measured for both clubfeet and control groups. Laaveg–Ponseti functional rating system was used for clinical evaluation and measurement of lower leg circumference was used for detection of atrophy.

Results

The average age was 21.5 years (range 19–34). The mean TC-DP angle was 16.97 in the clubfeet group and 21.03 in the control group. The mean TC-L angle was 23.34 in the clubfeet group and 33.98 in the control group. The mean TFM-DP angle was 9.02 in the clubfeet group and 7.9 in control group. There were statistically significant difference between clubfoot and control groups regarding the TC-DP angle and the TC-L angle. The average Laaveg–Ponseti score was 74 points (range 42–96). While no significant correlations could be detected between the TC-DP angle, the TC-L angle, the TFM-DP angle and the functional score, a significant correlation was detected between circumferential measurement of lower leg and functional score (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Functional outcome may be affected by lower leg muscular atrophy instead of foot alignment disturbance. Lastly we believe that results for treatment of clubfoot—a three-dimensional deformity—need to be evaluated with three-dimensional imaging techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miedzybrodzka Z (2003) Congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot): a disorder of the foot but not the hand. J Anat 202:37–42

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponseti IV (1992) Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:448–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson RS (2008) Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery-Pediatrics, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baron RL, Strugielski CF, Christman RA (2003) Positioning techniques and terminology. Foot and ankle radiology. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christman RA (2004) Foot and ankle radiology. Churchill Livingstone, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL (2006) Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):986–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalenderer O, Agus H, Ak M, Ozluk S (2004) Correlation of clinical and radiologic results of complete subtalar release in congenital clubfoot. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 37(5):368–373

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kalenderer O, Reisoglu A, Turgut A, Agus H (2008) Evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes of complete subtalar release in clubfoot treatment. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(6):451–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV (1980) Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(1):23–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ponseti IV, El-Khoury GY, Ippolito E, Weinstein SL (1981) A radiographic study of skeletal deformities in treated clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160:30–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prasad P, Sen RK, Gill SS, Wardak E, Saini R (2009) Clinico-radiological assessment and their correlation in clubfeet treated with postero-medial soft-tissue release. Int Orthop 33(1):225–229

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weissman SD (1989) Radiology of foot. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bursalı A (2001) Pes ekino varus (PEV) tedavisinde Ponseti metodunun erken sonucları. XVII. Ulusal Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kongresi Kongre Kitabı pp 338–339 (Turkish)

  14. Göksan SB (2002) Treatment of congenital clubfoot with the Ponseti method. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 36(4):281–287 (Turkish)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper DM, Dietz FR (1995) Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 77:1477–1489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Herbsthofer B, Eckardt A, Rompe JD, Kullmer K (1998) Significance of radiographic angle measurements in evaluation of congenital clubfoot. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:324–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lau JH, Meyer LC, Lau HC (1989) Results of surgical treatment of talipes equinovarus congenita. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:219–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson GH, Richardson AB, Westin GW (1982) Surgical management of resistant congenital talipes equinovarus deformities. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 64:652–665

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto H, Furuya K (1988) One-stage posteromedial release of congenital clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 8(5):590–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haasbeek JF, Wright JG (1997) A comparison of the long-term results of posterior and comprehensive release in the treatment of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 17(1):29–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ippolito E, De Maio F, Mancini F, Bellini D, Orefice A (2009) Leg muscle atrophy in idiopathic congenital clubfoot: is it primitive or acquired? J Child Orthop 3:171–178

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallander H, Saebö M, Jonsson K, Bjönness T, Hansson G (2012) Low prevalence of osteoarthritis in patients with congenital clubfoot at more than 60 years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(11):1522–1528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan KT, Hurley RA, Dural A, Hayman LA (2002) Improving the clinical assessment of leg muscle in adult clubfoot using magnetic resonance imaging: a case report. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 4(1):23–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duce SL, D’Alessandro M, Du Y, Jagpal B, Gilbert FJ, Crichton L, Barker S, Collinson JM, Miedzybrodzka Z (2013) 3D MRI analysis of the lower legs of treated idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot). PLoS One 8(1):e54100

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Merrill LJ, Gurnett CA, Siegel M, Sonavane S, Dobbs MB (2011) Vascular abnormalities correlate with decreased soft tissue volumes in idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1442–1449

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet İşyar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

İşyar, M., Çakmak, S., Mahiroğulları, M. et al. What is the fate of clubfoot patients treated by posteromedial release?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 789–794 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2213-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2213-y

Keywords

Navigation