Patients
This clinical trial involved 22 patients, all of whom had a fresh traumatic dislocation of the AC joint. There were 16 male and 6 female patients. In all, 8 dislocations of the right joint and 14 of the left joint were treated. The patients were 17–44 years old (average 26 years). The duration between joint injury and surgical treatment was 2–14 days (average 6.1 days). The patients were classified as Rockwood types III (n = 15) and V (n = 7). Preoperative examination indicated the presence of a prominent, towering extremitas acromialis claviculae with deformity and displacement instability. Radiography showed that the coracoclavicular distance increased to about 100 % compared to the contralateral.
Surgical procedure
The surgery was performed on patients in a “beach chair” position under general anesthesia. Intraoperative systolic pressure was maintained at approximately 100 mmHg. Arthroscopic lavage fluid contained 1:100,000–1:300,000 epinephrine hydrochloride. The position of the lavage fluid was 80–100 cm above the surgical site. The positions of the clavicle, acromion, and coracoid process were marked on the body surface. Arthroscopic portals were selected as follows (Fig. 1): one was placed medial to the tip of the coracoid process (approximately 2.0 cm distance), and another was placed laterally or slightly inferior to the tip of the coracoid process (approximately 1.5 cm distance, generally the same as a standard anterior portal for the shoulder joint). The shoulder joint was explored internally through the lateral portal of the coracoid process or after establishing a standard posterior portal.
Epinephrine hydrochloride in saline (20 mL) was first injected for infiltration around the portals to the surface of the coracoid process. To establish the portals, a sharp incision (0.5 cm) was made at the mark, followed by blunt expansion toward the coracoid process using a pair of straight tongs. When approaching the coracoid process, a small detacher was used to establish a working space at the surface of the coracoid process.
An arthroscope was placed at the portal lateral to the coracoid process, and surgical instruments were placed at the medial portal. The coracoid process was explored and identified under arthroscopic control. The working space was then expanded using the hand surgical detacher to obtain adequate room for performing the operation. The working space was then cleaned under arthroscopic control, and the orientation of the coracoid process and the directions of conoid and trapezoid fasciculi of the CC ligament were identified (Fig. 2a).
The coracoclavicular fascia was incised close to and along the inner edge of the coracoid process in the medial upper section using radiofrequency to expose the bone at the inner edge of the coracoid process. Through the incision, a hand-held surgical detacher was used to strip closely along the distal surface of the coracoid process (Fig. 2b). The stripped surface was positioned at the medial upper third of the coracoid process near the base (ligament insertion).
A 3- to 4-cm incision was made on the skin from the AC joint to the distal clavicle, which reached the periosteum. The AC joint and distal clavicle were exposed by subperiosteal separation. A knee joint posterior cruciate ligament locator was placed distally on the stripped surface at the base of the coracoid process under arthroscopic control (Figs. 1d, 2c). It was positioned proximally at the medioposterior third of the flat clavicle at the lateral end of the clavicle, 3 cm from the AC joint. A 2.0-mm K-wire was placed along a guide device, and three holes were drilled along the guide pin using a 4.5-mm core drill (denoted as hole A in the clavicle foramen and hole B in the coracoid foramen).
The distance from the dorsal surface of the coronoid process to the superior surface of the clavicle was measured in the state of AC joint reduction. An appropriate length of Endobutton (available in 15- to 60-mm loop lengths (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) (Fig. 3a) was selected and used with a No. 5 Ethibond suture (Ethicon Inc., Somerville NJ, USA). According to the direction of the drill holes, a pulling line was introduced using a self-threading suture instrument. The pulling line (b) that was threading the loop of Endobutton and the fixing line (a) were pulled together through holes B and A. The Endobutton plate was placed across the dorsal surface of the coracoid process (Figs. 2e, 3b).
A hole lateral to the clavicle (denoted as hole C) was drilled using a 2.5-mm K-wire at the anterior medial third of the flat clavicle, 12 mm from the anterior lateral side of the clavicle foramen (hole A). Following the procedure mentioned above, a pulling line was threaded from hole C into the working space using a self-threading suture instrument. Line (a) was separated from the loop of the Endobutton under an arthroscope, and the two strands of line (a) were pulled out through hole C (Fig. 3c), followed by threading the loop of the Endobutton that had been exposed on the superior surface of the clavicle. The position of the Endobutton plate was adjusted under arthroscopic control to cross the dorsal surface of the coronoid process and tightly flattened against the bone surface. The AC joint was reduced and the distal clavicle lowered by 2–3 cm compared with the acromion. Line (a) was strongly pulled, tightened, and then fixed by wrapping and knotting it (Fig. 3d).
We ascertained that the AC joint was satisfactorily reduced and the Endobutton fixation was tight. Arthroscopically, we observed that the Endobutton loop crossed the medial section of the original CC ligament and extended next to the outer edge of the ligament (Fig. 2f) and that the two strands of line (a) crossed hole C and extended along the trapezoid fasciculi of the CC ligament. The torn trapezoid and conoid fasciculi of the CC ligament were reduced using a hook. In the case of a severe tear in the CC ligament (type V–IV), a suture was pre-set (prior to clavicular reduction) under arthroscopic control on the upper and lower ends of the torn ligament using a self-threading suture instrument. After reduction–fixation of the AC joint, the suture was knotted to enhance the repair. Hemostasis was then assessed, and the surgery was completed under arthroscopic control. Finally, the AC ligament was sutured, and the deltoid and trapezius fascial cuffs were repaired. The abovementioned tissues were sutured at the distal end of the clavicle. The incisions were cleaned and sutured.
Postoperative treatment
After surgery, the injured arm was supported with a triangular sling for 1–2 weeks, during which time the patients began to practice aggressive circling with the injured shoulder. After discomfort ceased, the arm support was stopped, and the patients started a range of aggressive joint movement exercises. Up to 4 weeks postoperatively, the patients generally performed exercises that included only passive movement of shoulder joint. During weeks 4–6, the ligament was deemed to have healed sufficiently for the patient to practice progressively exercises with more resistance. From week 8, the patients began to return to normal activities and were allowed to start gentle throwing exercises. From week 12, the patients began to undertake heavy manual labor, confrontational exercises, and throwing training.
The joint range of motion was measured in both shoulders during the 1-year follow-up. To evaluate shoulder joint function, we obtained radiographs of the anterior and posterior positions of the AC joint at the 3-, 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits. Constant–Murley functional scores and Karlsson postoperative efficacy grades were also recorded.
Criterion of postoperative efficacy
The Karlsson criterion [15] was used to rank the postoperative efficacy into three grades: A, no pain, normal muscle strength, free movement of shoulder, and anatomical reduction of the AC joint or subluxation within a 5-mm gap shown radiographically; B, satisfactory outcome, slight pain, restricted function, moderate muscle strength, shoulder joint range of motion in all directions >90°, and wider AC joint space on the injured side than on the uninjured side by 5–10 cm, shown radiographically; C, poor outcome, pain intensified at night, weak muscle strength, <90° range of motion in all directions for the shoulder joint, and AC joint dislocation shown radiographically.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the 1-year Constant–Murley scores was performed using SPSS 18.0 software (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). Shoulder joint function was compared between the injured and uninjured sides using a paired t test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.