Skip to main content

Loss of notochordal cell phenotype in 3D-cell cultures: implications for disc physiology and disc repair

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery volume 134, pages 1673–1681 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Embryonic notochordal disc nucleus cells (NC) have been identified to protect disc tissue against disc degeneration but in human beings NC phenotype gets lost with aging and the pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. NC may stimulate other cells via soluble factors, and NC-conditioned medium can be used to stimulate matrix production of other disc cells and mesenchymal stem cells and thus may be of special interest for biological disc repair. As this stimulatory effect is associated with the NC phenotype, we investigated how cell morphology and gene-expression of the NC phenotype changes with time in 3D-cell culture.

Materials and methods

NC and inner annulus chondrocyte-like cells (CLC) from immature pigtails (freshly isolated cells/tissue, 3D-alginate beads, 3D-clusters) were cultured for up to 16 days under normoxia and hypoxia. Protein-expression was analysed by immunohistology and gene-expression analysis was carried out on freshly isolated cells and cultured cells. Cell morphology and proliferation were analysed by two-photon-laser-microscopy.

Results

Two-photon-laser-microscopy showed a homogenous and small CLC population in the inner annulus, which differed from the large vacuole-containing NC in the nucleus. Immunohistology found 93 % KRT8 positive cells in the nucleus and intracellular and pericellular Col2, IL6, and IL12 staining while CLC were KRT8 negative. Freshly isolated NC showed significantly higher KRT8 and CAIII but lower Col2 gene-expression than CLC. NC in 3D-cultures demonstrated significant size reduction and loss of vacuoles with culture time, all indicating a loss of the characteristic NC morphology. Hypoxia reduced the rate of decrease in NC size and vacuoles. Gene-expression of KRT8 and CAIII in NC fell significantly early in culture while Col2 did not decrease significantly within the culture period. In CLC, KRT8 and CAIII gene-expression was low and did not change noticeably in culture, whereas Col2 expression fell with time in culture.

Conclusions

3D-culture caused a rapid loss of NC phenotype towards a CLC phenotype with disappearance of vacuoles, reduced cell size, increased proliferation, and gene-expression changes. These findings may be related to NC nutritional demands and support the latest hypothesis of NC maturation into CLC opposing the idea that NC get lost in human discs by cell death or apoptosis to be replaced by CLC from the inner annulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Walmsley R (1953) The development and growth of the intervertebral disc. Edinb Med J 60(8):341–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trout JJ, Buckwalter JA, Moore KC, Landas SK (1982) Ultrastructure of the human intervertebral disc. I. Changes in notochordal cells with age. Tissue Cell 14(2):359–369

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guehring T, Urban JP, Cui Z, Tirlapur UK (2008) Non-invasive 3D vital imaging and characterisation of notochordal cells of the intervertebral disc by femtosecond near-infrared two-photon laser scanning microscopy and advanced surface volume rendering. Microsc Res Tech 71(4):298–304

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Risbud MV, Shapiro IM (2011) Notochordal cells in the adult intervertebral disc: new perspective on an old question. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 21(1):29–41

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bray JP, Burbidge HM (1998) The canine intervertebral disk. Part two: degenerative changes—nonchondrodystrophoid versus chondrodystrophoid disks. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 34(2):135–144

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guehring T, Wilde G, Sumner M, Grunhagen T, Karney GB, Tirlapur UK, Urban JP (2009) Notochordal intervertebral disc cells: sensitivity to nutrient deprivation. Arthritis Rheum 60(4):1026–1034

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guehring T, Nerlich A, Kroeber M, Richter W, Omlor GW (2010) Sensitivity of notochordal disc cells to mechanical loading: an experimental animal study. Eur Spine J 19(1):113–121

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim KW, Lim TH, Kim JG, Jeong ST, Masuda K, An HS (2003) The origin of chondrocytes in the nucleus pulposus and histologic findings associated with the transition of a notochordal nucleus pulposus to a fibrocartilaginous nucleus pulposus in intact rabbit intervertebral discs. Spine 28(10):982–990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim KW, Ha KY, Lee JS, Nam SW, Woo YK, Lim TH, An HS (2008) Notochordal cells stimulate migration of cartilage endplate chondrocytes of the intervertebral disc in in vitro cell migration assays. Spine J 9:323–329

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JH, Deasy BM, Seo HY, Studer RK, Vo NV, Georgescu HI, Sowa GA, Kang JD (2009) Differentiation of intervertebral notochordal cells through live automated cell imaging system in vitro. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 34(23):2486–2493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edeling MA, Sanker S, Shima T, Umasankar PK, Honing S, Kim HY, Davidson LA, Watkins SC, Tsang M, Owen DJ, Traub LM (2009) Structural requirements for PACSIN/Syndapin operation during zebrafish embryonic notochord development. PLoS ONE 4(12):e8150

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi KS, Cohn MJ, Harfe BD (2008) Identification of nucleus pulposus precursor cells and notochordal remnants in the mouse: implications for disk degeneration and chordoma formation. Dev Dyn 237(12):3953–3958

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiler C, Nerlich AG, Schaaf R, Bachmeier BE, Wuertz K, Boos N (2010) Immunohistochemical identification of notochordal markers in cells in the aging human lumbar intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J 19(10):1761–1770

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stosiek P, Kasper M, Karsten U (1988) Expression of cytokeratin and vimentin in nucleus pulposus cells. Differentiation 39(1):78–81

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aszodi A, Hunziker EB, Olsen BR, Fassler R (2001) The role of collagen II and cartilage fibril-associated molecules in skeletal development. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9:150–159

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu Y, McAlinden A, Sandell LJ (2001) Type IIA procollagen in development of the human intervertebral disc: regulated expression of the NH(2)-propeptide by enzymic processing reveals a unique developmental pathway. Dev Dyn 220(4):350–362

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujita N, Miyamoto T, Imai J, Hosogane N, Suzuki T, Yagi M, Morita K, Ninomiya K, Miyamoto K, Takaishi H, Matsumoto M, Morioka H, Yabe H, Chiba K, Watanabe S, Toyama Y, Suda T (2005) CD24 is expressed specifically in the nucleus pulposus of intervertebral discs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 338(4):1890–1896

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevens JW, Kurriger GL, Carter AS, Maynard JA (2000) CD44 expression in the developing and growing rat intervertebral disc. Dev Dyn 219(3):381–390

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Jing L, Gilchrist CL, Richardson WJ, Fitch RD, Setton LA (2009) Expression of laminin isoforms, receptors, and binding proteins unique to nucleus pulposus cells of immature intervertebral disc. Connect Tissue Res 50(5):294–306

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gotz W, Kasper M, Miosge N, Hughes RC (1997) Detection and distribution of the carbohydrate binding protein galectin-3 in human notochord, intervertebral disc and chordoma. Differentiation 62(3):149–157

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang X, Jing L, Chen J (2012) Changes in the molecular phenotype of nucleus pulposus cells with intervertebral disc aging. PLoS ONE 7(12):e52020

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Power KA, Grad S, Rutges JP, Creemers LB, van Rijen MH, O’Gaora P, Wall JG, Alini M, Pandit A, Gallagher WM (2011) Identification of cell surface-specific markers to target human nucleus pulposus cells: expression of carbonic anhydrase XII varies with age and degeneration. Arthritis Rheum 63(12):3876–3886

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aguiar DJ, Johnson SL, Oegema TR (1999) Notochordal cells interact with nucleus pulposus cells: regulation of proteoglycan synthesis. Exp Cell Res 246(1):129–137

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McCann MR, Bacher CA, Seguin CA (2011) Exploiting notochord cells for stem cell-based regeneration of the intervertebral disc. J Cell Commun Signal 5(1):39–43

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Korecki CL, Taboas JM, Tuan RS, Iatridis JC (2010) Notochordal cell conditioned medium stimulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward a young nucleus pulposus phenotype. Stem Cell Res Ther 1(2):18

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Purmessur D, Schek RM, Abbott RD, Ballif BA, Godburn KE, Iatridis JC (2011) Notochordal conditioned media from tissue increases proteoglycan accumulation and promotes a healthy nucleus pulposus phenotype in human mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis Res Ther 13(3):R81

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Erwin WM, Ashman K, O’Donnel P, Inman RD (2006) Nucleus pulposus notochord cells secrete connective tissue growth factor and up-regulate proteoglycan expression by intervertebral disc chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum 54(12):3859–3867

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abbott RD, Purmessur D, Monsey RD, Iatridis JC (2012) Regenerative potential of TGFbeta3+ Dex and notochordal cell conditioned media on degenerated human intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res 30(3):482–488

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Erwin WM, Inman RD (2006) Notochord cells regulate intervertebral disc chondrocyte proteoglycan production and cell proliferation. Spine 31(10):1094–1099

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Poitier E, Ito K (2012) Notochordal cells promote disk matrix formation by mesenchymal stem cells and nucleus pulposus cells. Global Spine J. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1319881

  31. Bibby SR, Urban JP (2004) Effect of nutrient deprivation on the viability of intervertebral disc cells. Eur Spine J 13(8):695–701

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maldonado BA, Oegema TR Jr (1992) Initial characterization of the metabolism of intervertebral disc cells encapsulated in microspheres. J Orthop Res 10(5):677–690

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Minogue BM, Richardson SM, Zeef LA, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA (2010) Characterization of the human nucleus pulposus cell phenotype and evaluation of novel marker gene expression to define adult stem cell differentiation. Arthritis Rheum 62(12):3695–3705

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Omlor GW, Nerlich AG, Wilke HJ, Pfeiffer M, Lorenz H, Schaaf-Keim M, Bertram H, Richter W, Carstens C, Guehring T (2009) A new porcine in vivo animal model of disc degeneration: response of anulus fibrosus cells, chondrocyte-like nucleus pulposus cells, and notochordal nucleus pulposus cells to partial nucleotomy. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 34(25):2730–2739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Grunhagen T, Wilde G, Soukane DM, Shirazi-Adl SA, Urban JP (2006) Nutrient supply and intervertebral disc metabolism. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 2):30–35

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Purmessur D, Guterl C, Cho S, Cornejo M, Lam Y, Ballif B, Laudier D, Iatridis J (2013) Dynamic pressurization induces transition of notochordal cells to a mature phenotype while retaining production of important patterning ligands from development. Arthritis Res Ther 15:R122

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rastogi A, Thakore P, Leung A, Benavides M, Machado M, Morschauser MA, Hsieh AH (2009) Environmental regulation of notochordal gene expression in nucleus pulposus cells. J Cell Physiol 220(3):698–705

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spillekom S, Smolder L, Grinwis G, Arkesteijn I, Ito K, Meij B, Tryfonidou M (2013) Increased osmolarity and cell clustering preserves canine notochordal cell phenotype in culture. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. doi:10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0479

  39. Sudo H, Yamada K, Iwasaki K, Higashi H, Ito M, Minami A, Iwasaki N (2013) Global identification of genes related to nutrient deficiency in intervertebral disc cells in an experimental nutrient deprivation model. PLoS ONE 8(3):e58806

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hunter CJ, Matyas JR, Duncan NA (2004) The functional significance of cell clusters in the notochordal nucleus pulposus: survival and signaling in the canine intervertebral disc. Spine 29(10):1099–1104

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Erwin WM, Las Heras F, Islam D, Fehlings MG, Inman RD (2009) The regenerative capacity of the notochordal cell: tissue constructs generated in vitro under hypoxic conditions. J Neurosurg Spine 10(6):513–521

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany

    G. W. Omlor

  2. Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Munich-Bogenhausen, 81925, Munich, Germany

    A. G. Nerlich

  3. Department of Engineering Science, Oxford Centre for Tissue Engineering and Bioprocessing, Oxford, OX1-3PJ, UK

    U. K. Tirlapur

  4. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1-3QX, UK

    J. P. Urban

  5. Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany

    T. Guehring

Authors
  1. G. W. Omlor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. G. Nerlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. K. Tirlapur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. P. Urban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Guehring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Guehring.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omlor, G.W., Nerlich, A.G., Tirlapur, U.K. et al. Loss of notochordal cell phenotype in 3D-cell cultures: implications for disc physiology and disc repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 1673–1681 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2097-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2097-2

Keywords

  • Notochordal disc cells
  • Cell culture
  • Disc degeneration
  • Disc cell therapy