Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Fracture sequelae (FS) of the proximal humerus is a challenging scenario in shoulder surgery. Despite they have been traditionally treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been recently introduced. However, there are no studies comparing the results of HA and RSA in FS. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and quality of life-related outcomes, and complications in the treatment of proximal humeral FS between HA and RSA.

Materials and methods

A therapeutic prospective non-randomized comparative study was conducted. All consecutive patients with diagnosis of FS after non-operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures and no previous shoulder surgery were considered for this study. A total of 32 patients (24 females, 8 males) with a mean (SD) age at the time of surgery of 80.1 (4.9) years were finally included: 12 in the HA group, and 20 in the RSA group. FS were treated with shoulder arthroplasty by the implantation of either HA or RSA. Constant score (total and specific items), quality of life (assessed through SF-36), and complications requiring revision surgery were compared between groups.

Results

All parameters of the Constant score significantly improved in the postoperative compared to preoperative period when considering the entire sample. The RSA group demonstrated a higher improvement in total Constant score (p = 0.06) and Constant activity level (p = 0.02) compared to the HA group. The HA demonstrated a higher number of complications compared to the RSA (p = 0.05). There were no differences in SF-36 scores between both groups.

Conclusions

The shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for FS with significant improvement in pain and function. The RSA may be a better option than HA for FS given the trend towards better total Constant score and a significantly lower number of complications requiring revision surgery.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic level II evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antuña SA, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH (2002) Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral malunions: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antuña SA, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH (2002) Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral nonunions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:114–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C (2006) Proximal humerus fracture sequelae. Impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:121–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I (2006) Neer Award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:527–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brorson S, Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Hrobjartsson A (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg 7:70–78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2050–2055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dines DM, Klarren RF, Altchek DW, Moeckel B (1993) Posttraumatic changes of the proximal humerus: malunion, nonunion, and osteonecrosis. Treatment with modular hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2:11–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duquin TR, Jacobson JA, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling J, Cofield RH (2012) Unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral nonunions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1610–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D (2011) Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2469–2475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gadea F, Alami G, Pape G, Boileau P, Favard L (2012) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty: outcomes and long-term survival analysis according to etiology. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:659–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:48–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR (2005) Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiliç M, Berth A, Blatter G, Fuhrmann U, Gebhardt K, Rott O, Zenz P, Irlenbusch U (2010) Anatomic and reverse shoulder prostheses in fracture sequelae of the humeral head. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44:417–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kontakis GM, Tosounidis T, Galanakis I, Megas P (2008) Prosthetic replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Injury 39:1345–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mansat P, Guity MR, Bellumore Y, Mansat M (2004) Shoulder arthroplasty for late sequeale of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:305–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audigé L (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21:S1–S133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin TG, Iannotti JP (2008) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures and failed management after proximal humeral fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 39:451–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez AA, Bejarano C, Carbonel I, Iglesias D, Gil-Alvaroba J, Herrera A (2012) The treatment of proximal humerus nonunions in older patients with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injury 43:S3–S6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez AA, Calvo A, Bejarano C, Carbonel I, Herrera A (2012) The use of the Lima reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Sci 17:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C, Kim B, Bell JE (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic reivew. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1737–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moineau G, McClelland WB, Trojani C, Rumian A, Walch G, Boileau P (2012) Prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis (Type-1 proximal humeral fracture sequelae). J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2186–2194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Namdari S, Horneff JG, Baldwin K (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1701–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Panagopoulos A, Tsoumpos P, Evangelou K, Georgiou C, Triantafillopoulos I (2013) Late prosthetic shoulder hemiarthroplasty after failed management of complex proximal humeral fractures. Adv Orthop 2013:403580. doi:10.1155/2013/403580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Reuther F, Mühlhäusler B, Wahl D, Nijs S (2010) Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: a multicentre analysis. Injury 41:606–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J (1998) Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tepass A, Rolauffs B, Weise K, Bahrs SD, Dietz K, Bahrs C (2013) Complication rates and outcomes stratified by treatment modalities in proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review from 1970 to 2009. Patient Saf Surg 7:34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Torrens C, Corrales M, Vilà G, Santana F, Cáceres E (2011) Functional and quality-of-life results of displaced and nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures treated conservatively. J Orthop Trauma 25:581–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vallier HA (2007) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21:469–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wellmann M, Struck M, Pastor MF, Gettmann A, Windhagen H, Smith T (2013) Short and midterm results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to the preoperative etiology. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:463–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Willis M, Min W, Brooks JP, Mulieri P, Walker M, Pupello D, Frankle M (2012) Proximal humeral malunion treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:507–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar & Hospital de l’Esperança, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain

    Eduard Alentorn-Geli, Pau Guirro, Fernando Santana & Carles Torrens

Authors
  1. Eduard Alentorn-Geli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pau Guirro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fernando Santana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carles Torrens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carles Torrens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alentorn-Geli, E., Guirro, P., Santana, F. et al. Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 1545–1550 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2074-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2074-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation