Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Tibial tubercle osteotomy in septic revision total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Revision Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The incidence of revision knee arthroplasty for infection is increasing and the required surgical approach for the revision is a challenge for surgeons. Extensile approaches are frequently used when it is impossible to evert the extensor mechanism. The aim of this paper is to report our experience with tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) and the functional results in patients who underwent a two-stage revision due to prosthesis infection.

Methods

Twenty-six patients underwent a TTO as a surgical approach in the second stage of revision for infection. The patients were clinically assessed by means of functional scales (the Knee Society Score and WOMAC) and X-rays.

Results

The TTO healed without complications in 22 patients (84.6 %) and the average length of follow-up was 3.4 years. Non-union was observed in two patients. One patient presented an extension lag of 5°. A total of 23 patients (88.4 %) were free from infection. Twenty-five patients (96.1 %) had better scores on the Knee Society Score and WOMAC after the procedure.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing the second stage of revision total knee arthroplasty for infection, the TTO approach provides a large operating field. This enables surgeons to withdraw spacers and position new implants without damaging the extensor mechanism of the knee or altering the postoperative rehabilitation process. The complications that have been reported as a result of this procedure could be reduced by performing a meticulous surgical technique.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Del Pozo JL, Patel R (2009) Clinical practice. Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med 361:787–794. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0905029

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL, Smith P, Munn B, Engh G, Rorabeck C (1998) The Ranawat Award. Comparison of surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whiteside LA (1995) Exposure in difficult total knee arthroplasty using tibial tubercle osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:92–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Whiteside LA, Ohl MD (1990) Tibial tubercle osteotomy for exposure of the difficult total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:6–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dolin MG (1983) Osteotomy of the tibial tubercle in total knee replacement. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(5):704–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mendes MW, Caldwell P, Jiranek WA (2004) The results of tibial tubercle osteotomy for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(2):167–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks P (2009) Extensor mechanism ruptures. Orthopedics 32(9). doi:10.3928/01477447-20090728-31

  10. Choi HR, Burke D, Malchau H, Kwon YM (2012) Utility of tibial tubercle osteotomy in the setting of periprosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36:1609–1613

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wishart M, Arnold MP, Huegli RW, Amsler F, Friederich NF, Hirschmann MT (2012) Anterolateral approach using tibial tubercle osteotomy for total knee arthroplasty: can we predict failure? Int Orthop 36:2485–2490

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zonnenberg CBL, van den Bekerom MPJ, de Jong T, Nolte PA (2014) Tibial tubercle osteotomy with absorbable suture fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a report of 23 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:667–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruni D, Iacono F, Sharma B, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2013) Tibial tubercle osteotomy or quadriceps snip in two-stage revision for prosthetic knee infection? A randomized prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1305–1318

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chinzei N, Ishida K, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Iguchi T, Chin T, Akisue T, Nishida K, Kurosaka M, Tsumura N (2014) Tibial tubercle osteotomy with screw fixation for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 37(4):367–373

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wolff AM, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Jacobs MA (1989) Osteotomy of the tibial tubercle during total knee replacement. A report of twenty-six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(6):848–852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Young CF, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH (2008) Tibial tubercle osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 23(3):371–375. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manopoulos P, Havet E, Pearce O, Lardanchet JF, Mertl P (2012) Mid- to long-term results of revision total knee replacement using press-fit intramedullary stems with cemented femoral and tibial components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(7):937–940. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.26943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deane CR, Ferran NA, Ghandour A, Morgan-Jones RL (2008) Tibial tubercle osteotomy for access during revision knee arthroplasty: Ethibond suture repair technique. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 30(9):98. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davis K, Caldwell P, Wayne J, Jiranek WA (2000) Mechanical comparison of fixation techniques for the tibial tubercle osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:241–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service of Orthopaedic Surgery, Knee Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain

    Josep M. Segur, Juan Carlos Martinez-Pastor, Francisco Macule & Santiago Suso

  2. Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Hospital Universitario “Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez”, Orthopedics and Traumatology, Monterrey, Mexico

    Felix Vilchez-Cavazos & Carlos Acosta-Olivo

Authors
  1. Josep M. Segur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Felix Vilchez-Cavazos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan Carlos Martinez-Pastor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francisco Macule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Santiago Suso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carlos Acosta-Olivo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Vilchez-Cavazos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Segur, J.M., Vilchez-Cavazos, F., Martinez-Pastor, J.C. et al. Tibial tubercle osteotomy in septic revision total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 1311–1315 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2064-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2064-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation