Skip to main content
Log in

Orthogeriatric model for hip fracture patients in Singapore: our early experience and initial outcomes

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript



The aging population is growing rapidly in Asia resulting in an increased number of fragility fractures. Studies have shown that an integrated model of care for the elderly can improve the quality of patient care and outcomes. This report describes our concept, initial experience and short-term outcomes of the integrated model of care that was established in managing geriatric hip fractures in Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Patient and methods

An integrated care pathway model was implemented. The principle of the model is based on (a) timely admission, review, surgery, rehabilitation, transfer, (b) multidisciplinary approach and (c) integration of a care manager. Hip fracture patients (>60 years) were included in our study and were followed up for 1 year. Demographic data, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), time to surgery, length of stay and modified Barthel index (MBI) scores were recorded.


The mean age was 82 years (62–108) with a female predominance (75 %). The mean CCI was 1.8. Time to admission was 3.7 h and mean time taken to be reviewed by an integrated care manager was 21.7 h. Close to 40 % of patients were operated within 48 h with a median time to surgery of 36.7 h. Mean length of stay was 10 days with an inpatient and 1-year mortality rate of 2.3 and 5.9 %, respectively. Complication rate was 5.1 % (urinary tract infection and wound infection) and MBI scores at 1 year revealed significant functional improvement of 95 % (p < 0.01).


Our integrated model of care for hip fractures can lead to satisfactory outcomes. Though the time to surgery and length of stay can be improved further, our initial results have shown a reasonable time to admission and review by a care manager. Besides a low complication and mortality rate, functional improvement was significant post-operatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore (2010). Yearbook of statistics Singapore 2009. In: Statistics Singapore [online]. Available at Accessed Mar 25, 2010

  2. The National Survey of Senior Citizens in Singapore (1995). Singapore

  3. Cheung P (1996) The ageing population. In: Chan KM, Yap KB, Wong SF (eds) Geriatric medicine for Singapore. Armour Academics, Singapore, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ojo P, O’Connor J, Kim D, Ciardiello K, Bonadies J (2009) Patterns of injury in geriatric falls. Conn Med 73(3):139–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB (2003) Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(3):364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saltzherr TP, Borgahns HJ, Bakker RH, Go PM (2006) Proximal femur fractures in the elderly in the Netherlands during the period 1991–2004: incidence, mortality, length of stay and an estimate of care capacity needed in the future. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 150(47):2599–2604

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kammerlander C, Riedmüller P, Gosch M, Zegg M, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Schmid R, Roth T (2012) Functional outcome and mortality in geriatric distal femoral fractures. Injury 43(7):1096–1101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL (2009) Impact of a comanaged geriatric fracture center on short-term hip fracture outcomes. Arch Intern Med 169(18):1712–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Blauth M, Lechleitner M, Luger TJ, Roth T (2011) The tyrolean geriatric fracture center: an orthogeriatric co-management model. Z Gerontol Geriatr 44(6):363–367. doi:10.1007/s00391-011-0253-7 Epub 2011 Dec 14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedmann SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL et al (2008) Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: total quality management and protocol driven care results in better outcomes for a frail patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1349–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen D, Gillen E, Rixson L (2009) Systematic review of the effectiveness of integrated care pathways: what works, for whom, in which circumstances? Int J Evid Based Healthc 7(2):61–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shyu YI, Liang J, Wu CC, Su JY, Cheng HS, Chou SW, Chen MC, Yang CT, Tseng MY (2010) Two-year effects of interdisciplinary intervention for hip fracture in older Taiwanese. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(6):1081–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siddiqui MQ, Sim L, Koh J, Fook-Chong S, Tan C, Howe TS (2010) Stress levels amongst caregivers of patients with osteoporotic hip fractures- a prospective cohort study. Ann Acad Med Singapore 39(1):38–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong MK, Arjandas, Ching LK, Lim SL, Lo NN (2002) Osteoporotic hip fractures in Singapore–costs and patient’s outcome. Ann Acad Med Singapore 31(1):3–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM (2008) Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(7):1349–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher AA, Davis MW, Rubenach SE, Sivakumaran S, Smith PN, Budge MM (2006) Outcomes for older patients with hip fractures: the impact of orthopedic and geriatric medicine cocare. J Orthop Trauma 20(3):172–178 (discussion 179-80)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Menzies IB, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, Friedman SM (2012) The impact of comorbidity on perioperative outcomes of hip fractures in a geriatric fracture model. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3(3):129–134

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu T, Congdon N, Yan X, Jin L, Wu Y, Friedman D, He M (2012) A randomized, controlled trial of an intervention promoting cataract surgery acceptance in rural China: the Guangzhou Uptake of Surgery Trial (GUSTO). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(9):5271–5278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amir M, Rabbani MZ, Parvez MB (2009) Informed consent in elective surgical procedures: “what do the patients think”? J Pak Med Assoc 59(10):679–682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Falagas ME, Korbila IP, Giannopoulou KP, Kondilis BK, Peppas G (2009) Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am J Surg 198(3):420–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Collinge C, McWilliam-Ross K, Beltran MJ, Weaver T (2013) Measures of clinical outcome before, during, and after implementation of a comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program: is there a learning curve? J Orthop Traum. 27:672–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Folbert EC, Smit RS, van der Velde D, Regtuijt EM, Klaren MH, Hegeman JH (2012) Geriatric fracture center: a multidisciplinary treatment approach for older patients with a hip fracture improved quality of clinical care and short-term treatment outcomes. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3(2):59–67

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Butler M, Forte ML, Joglekar SB, Swiontkowski MF, Kane RL (2011) Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(12):1104–1115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee YH, Lim YW, Lam KS (2008) Economic cost of osteoporotic hip fractures in Singapore. Singapore Med J 49(12):980–984

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hershkovitz A, Beloosesky Y, Brill S (2012) Mobility assessment of hip fracture patients during a post-acute rehabilitation program. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 55(1):35–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hershkovitz A, Pulatov I, Brill S, Beloosesky Y (2012) Can hip-fractured elderly patients maintain their rehabilitation achievements after 1 year? Disabil Rehabil 34(4):304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hitendra K. Doshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doshi, H.K., Ramason, R., Azellarasi, J. et al. Orthogeriatric model for hip fracture patients in Singapore: our early experience and initial outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 351–357 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: