Skip to main content

Clinical comparison between double-row and transosseous-equivalent repairs for medium to large size rotator cuff tears

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery volume 133, pages 1727–1734 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The transosseous-equivalent (TOE) repair of the rotator cuff tears was invented to make up for several shortcomings of the double-row (DR) repair. However, no studies have compared the clinical aspects of the DR repair and the TOE technique, supporting the superior results of the TOE technique over the DR repair, including the benefit of minimizing surgical steps. We asked whether differences existed between the two repairs regarding clinical outcomes, time and costs.

Materials and methods

Subjects included 55 using the DR repair and 119 using the TOE repair for the medium to large sized rotator cuff tears. Clinical outcomes were measured with a Visual Analog Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and shoulder strength. For practical aspects, operative time and number of suture anchors used for the medial and lateral rows were compared.

Results

Both repairs brought substantial improvements in pain and function. However, significant differences were not detected between the repairs in all the clinical measurements. Regarding operative time and costs, in the medium size tears, a statistical difference was found only in the anchors used for the lateral row. In the large size tears, the DR repair required more operation time than the TOE repair, while the TOE repair used more anchors for the lateral row.

Conclusion

This study failed to demonstrate clinical differences between the techniques. However, when stratifying rotator cuff tears according to the tear sizes, significant differences were found in operative time and cost: the DR repair had the advantage of cost effectiveness by saving anchors for the lateral row, while the TOE repair required less operative time with more anchors used for the lateral row in the large size tears. This finding provides evidence to support the use of the TOE repair to reduce surgical steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJ (2002) Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy 18:519–526

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baums MH, Spahn G, Steckel H, Fischer A, Schultz W, Klinger HM (2009) Comparative evaluation of the tendon-bone interface contact pressure in different single- versus double-row suture anchor repair techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1466–1472

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bisson L, Zivaljevic N, Sanders S, Pula D A cost analysis of single-row versus double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (in press)

  4. Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, Fink B, Greis PE (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37:674–682

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaiche L, Petrover D (2007) Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?: A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment. Am J Sports Med 35:1247–1253

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J B Jt Surg Am 66:563–567

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L, Rizzello G, Denaro V (2007) Arthroscopic management of calcific tendinitis of the subscapularis tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1482–1485

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M (2005) The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J B Jt Surg Am 87:1697–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerber C, Maquieira G, Espinosa N (2006) Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. J B Jt Surg Am 88:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25:4–12

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J B Jt Surg Am 73:982–989

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kilcoyne RF, Reddy PK, Lyons F, RC A Jr (1989) Optimal plain film imaging of the shoulder impingement syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153:795–797

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2003) Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 19:1035–1042

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mihata T, Fukuhara T, Jun BJ, Watanabe C, Kinoshita M (2011) Effect of shoulder abduction angle on biomechanical properties of the repaired rotator cuff tendons with three types of double-row technique. Am J Sports Med 39:551–556

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller BS, Downie BK, Kohen RB, Kijek T, Lesniak B, Jacobson JA, Hughes RE, Carpenter JE (2011) When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 39:2064–2070

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH, Park HK, Yu JW, Seo JB (2008) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 36:1310–1316

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park MC, Pirolo JM, Park CJ, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2009) The effect of abduction and rotation on footprint contact for single-row, double-row, and modified double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 37:1599–1608

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park MC, Idjadi JA, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2008) The effect of dynamic external rotation comparing 2 footprint-restoring rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 36:893–900

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ (2007) Part I: footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Should Elb Surg 16:461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park MC, Jun BJ, Park CJ, Ahmad CS, ElAttrache NS, Lee TQ (2007) The biomechanical effects of dynamic external rotation on rotator cuff repair compared to testing with the humerus fixed. Am J Sports Med 35:1931–1939

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ (2007) Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Should Elb Surg 16:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Park MC, Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS, Tibone JE (2006) “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 22(1360):e1–e5

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quigley RJ, Gupta A, Oh JH, Chung KC, McGarry MH, Gupta R, Tibone JE, Lee TQ (2013) Biomechanical comparison of single-row, double-row, and transosseous-equivalent repair techniques after healing in an animal rotator cuff tear model. J Orthop Res 31:1254–1260

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ruotolo C, Fow JE, Nottage WM (2004) The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. Arthroscopy 20:246–249

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2001) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. J B Jt Surg Am 83-A:1814–1822

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sethi PM, Noonan BC, Cunningham J, Shreck E, Miller S (2010) Repair results of 2-tendon rotator cuff tears utilizing the transosseous equivalent technique. J Should Elb Surg 19:1210–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F (1997) Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Rel Res 344:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J, Hodler J, Gerber C (2008) The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J B Jt Surg Am 90:2423–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No author or related institute has received any financial benefit from research in this study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea

    Jin-Young Park, Seok Won Chung, Hassan Zulkifli, Jung-Hyun Cho & Kyung-Soo Oh

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, LeeChunTek Hospital, 130-1, Kyo-dong, Paldal-gu, Suwon, Gyounggi-do, South Korea

    Sang-Yoon Lee

Authors
  1. Jin-Young Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sang-Yoon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seok Won Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hassan Zulkifli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jung-Hyun Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kyung-Soo Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung-Soo Oh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, JY., Lee, SY., Chung, S.W. et al. Clinical comparison between double-row and transosseous-equivalent repairs for medium to large size rotator cuff tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133, 1727–1734 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1872-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1872-9

Keywords

  • Rotator cuff tear
  • Double row
  • Transosseous-equivalent