Intramedullary nail versus extramedullary plate fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures: decision analysis
- 860 Downloads
The best options of internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients remain controversial. We determined whether intramedullary nail or extramedullary plate provides better treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures using a decision analysis tool that considers quality of life.
A decision analysis model was constructed containing final outcome score and the probability of mortality within 1 year, infection, and mechanical complications. Final outcome was defined as health-related quality of life and was used as a utility in the decision tree. Probabilities were obtained by literature review, and health-related quality of life was evaluated by asking 30 orthopedic experts to complete a questionnaire. A roll back tool was used to determine the best surgical option, and sensitivity analysis was performed to compensate for decision model uncertainty.
The decision model favored intramedullary nailing in terms of quality of life. In one-way sensitivity analysis, intramedullary nailing was more beneficial than the extramedullary plating, when probability of mechanical complication after intramedullary nailing was below 0.258.
In terms of quality of life, the decision analysis model showed that intramedullary nailing was more beneficial for patients with an unstable intertrochanteric fracture.
KeywordsUnstable intertrochanteric fracture Internal fixation Intramedullary nail Extramedullary plate Decision analysis
The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity.
Conflict of interest
- 3.Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ (2003) Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:899–904Google Scholar
- 8.Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2005) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000093Google Scholar
- 15.Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P (2002) Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:372–381Google Scholar
- 22.Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C, Greenwood R, Harries WJ, Chesser TJ (2010) A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31–A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:792–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lunsjo K, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Skytting B, Tidermark J, Berntson PO, Allvin I, Norberg S, Hjalmars K, Larsson S, Knebel R, Hauggaard A, Stigsson L (2001) Extramedullary fixation of 569 unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a randomized multicenter trial of the Medoff sliding plate versus three other screw-plate systems. Acta Orthop Scand 72:133–140Google Scholar