Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Return to play following ACL reconstruction: survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (AGA instructors)

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lack of consensus regarding appropriate criteria attesting patient’s unrestricted sports activities after ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to perform a survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons regarding their return to play guidelines in these patients.

Methods

A six-item questionnaire was distributed among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (instructors of the German speaking society of arthroscopy, AGA). Study participants were asked to choose from multiple choice answers and had the possibility answering in an open discussion field.

Results

The response rate of the survey was 85.7 %. A total of 83.5 % used autologous hamstring grafts for ACL reconstruction in athletes followed by BPTB (37.2 %) and quadriceps tendon graft (12 %). Approximately 63.5 % recommended a time point later than 6 months allowing return to play after ACL reconstruction in the athlete (after 4 and 6 months 2.3 and 35.3 %, respectively). 76.6 % recommended starting with sports specific rehabilitation after 4 months (21.6 % after 6 months). The most frequent criterion (multiple answers) to allow return to play was negative Lachman test (81.7 % positive answers) followed by free range of motion (78.4 %), negative pivot shift (60.1 %), anterior drawer (45.4 %), proprioception test (43.1 %), muscular strength analysis (40.8 %), single-leg hop jump test (39.0 %), KT 1000 measurement (16.1 %), and MRI (4.1 %). Of the surgeons 85.8 % did not use any of the given scores as criterion to allow return to competitive sports (subjective IKDC score 10.6 %, Lysholm score 8.3 %, objective IKDC score 7.4 %, Tegner activity scale 3.7 %).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the majority of surgeons do not consider muscle function, jump tests, alignment tests, and proprioception as relevant return to sports criterion. However, these are two crucial parameters for return to sports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ait Si Selmi T, Fithian D, Neyret P (2006) The evolution of osteoarthritis in 103 patients with ACL reconstruction at 17 years follow-up. Knee 13:353–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 45(7):596–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR (2011) Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(12):1697–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber-Westin SD, Smith ST, Campbell T, Noyes FR (2010) The drop-jump video screening test: retention of improvement in neuromuscular control in female volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 24(11):3055–3062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonfim TR, Paccola CA, Barela JA (2003) Proprioceptive and behavior impairments in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1217–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crossley KM, Zhang WJ, Schache AG, Bryant A, Cowan SM (2011) Performance on the single-leg squat task indicates hip abductor muscle function. Am J Sports Med 39:866–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deneweth JM, Bey MJ, McLean SG, Lock TR, Kolowich PA, Tashman S (2010) Tibiofemoral joint kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee during a single-legged hop landing. Am J Sports Med 38:1820–1828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Robak OR, Mølster A, Viset AT, Engebretsen L (2006) A sixteen-year follow-up of three operative techniques for the treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:944–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA (2009) Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 43:371–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao B, Zheng NN (2010) Alterations in three-dimensional joint kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees during walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gokeler A, Hof AL, Arnold MP, Dijkstra PU, Postema K, Otten E (2010) Abnormal landing strategies after ACL reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20:e12–e19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartigan EH, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2010) Time line for noncopers to pass return-to-sports criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40:141–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hertel P, Behrend H, Cierpinski T, Musahl V, Widjaja G (2005) ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone press-fit fixation: 10-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:248–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR (2006) Preparticipation physical examination using a box drop vertical jump test in young athletes: the effects of puberty and sex. Clin J Sport Med 16:298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ (2007) Contralateral limb strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22:543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hui C, Salmon LJ, Kok A, Maeno S, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2011) Fifteen-year outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft for “isolated” anterior cruciate ligament tear. Am J Sports Med 39:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Keays AC, Newcombe PA, Bullock MI (2007) A 6-year follow-up of the effect of graft site on strength, stability, range of motion, function, and joint degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft. Am J Sports Med 35:729–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kvist J (2004) Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation. Sports Med 34:269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madhavan S, Shields RK (2011) Neuromuscular responses in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament repair. Clin Neurophysiol 122:997–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mascarenhas R, Tranovich M, Karpie JC, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (2010) Patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the high-demand patient: evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26:S58–S66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Myklebust G, Holm I, Maehlum S, Engebretsen L, Bahr R (2003) Clinical, functional, and radiologic outcome in team handball players 6 to 11 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 31:981–989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakata K, Shino K, Horibe S (2008) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen bone plug free allogeneic tendons: 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 24:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Karlsson J (2006) Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:571–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C, Walsh C, West J (2005) The drop-jump screening test: difference in lower limb control by gender and effect of neuromuscular training in female athletes. Am J Sports Med 33(2):197–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19:513–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C, Walsh C, West J (2005) The drop-jump screening test: difference in lower limb control by gender and effect of neuromuscular training in female athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:197–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Orishimo KF, Kremenic IJ, Mullaney MJ, McHugh MP, Nicholas SJ (2010) Adaptations in single-leg hop biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1587–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Papannagari R, Gill TJ, Defrate LE, Moses JM, Petruska AJ, Li G (2006) In vivo kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and functional evaluation. Am J Sports Med 34:2006–2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR (2010) Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 38:1968–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Petersen W, Zantop T, Rosenbaum D, Raschke MJ (2005) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in female athletes. Part 2: prevention strategies. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin 6:157–165

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K (2006) Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med 34:721–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M (2009) Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 37:246–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D, Anderson K, Anderst W (2007) Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Grinsven S, van Cingel RE, Holla CJ, van Loon CJ (2010) Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1128–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weiler A, Peine R, Pashmineh-Azar A, Abel C, Südkamp NP, Hoffmann RF (2002) Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part I: biomechanical results after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy 18(2):113–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Martin Luther Hospital, Caspar Theyss Straße 27-31, Grunewald, 14193, Berlin, Germany

    Wolf Petersen

  2. Sporthopaedicum Straubing, Bahnhofsplatz 27, 94315, Straubing, Germany

    Thore Zantop

Authors
  1. Wolf Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thore Zantop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf Petersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersen, W., Zantop, T. Return to play following ACL reconstruction: survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (AGA instructors). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133, 969–977 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1746-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1746-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation