Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconstructive surgery using interference screw fixation for painful accessory navicular in adult athletes

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To examine the effectiveness of a new technique for reattaching the posterior tibial tendon (PTT) using a bone tunnel and interference screw after resection of the accessory navicular for painful accessory navicular (type II) in adult athletes.

Methods

Ten adult athletes (7 male, 3 female; mean age 30 years, range 23–45) underwent reconstruction using a bone tunnel with an interference screw for a painful accessory navicular. All patients complained of pain on the medial aspect of the foot after eversion sprain during sports activities and radiographs revealed type II accessory navicular. Clinical evaluation with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle–Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) before surgery was compared with that at most recent follow up (mean 30 months, range 24–39).

Results

Mean AOFAS score improved from a preoperative 62.8 ± 2.9 points (range 61–82) to a postoperative 92.1 ± 7.0 points (range 83–100; p < 0.01). Furthermore, mean VAS score improved from a preoperative 92.5 ± 5.4 points (range 85–100) to a postoperative 4.5 ± 3.8 points (range 0–10; p < 0.01). All patients could return to full sports activity at a mean of 14 weeks (range 12–18) after surgery.

Conclusions

The presented technique reconstructs the bone-tendon interface of the PTT at the primary navicular with sufficient fixation after resection of the accessory navicular, which preserves the strength of the PTT in adult athletes with an intractably painful accessory navicular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coughlin MJ (2007) Sesamoids and accessory bones of the foot, in Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL (ed) Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, vol 1, pp 531- 610

  2. Geist E (1925) The accessory scaphoid bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 7:570–574

    Google Scholar 

  3. Veitch JM (1978) Evaluation of the Kidner procedure in treatment of symptomatic accessory tarsal scaphoid. Clin Orthop 131:210–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seltzer SE, Weissman BN, Braunstein EM, Adams DF, Thomas WH (1984) Computed tomography of the hindfoot. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:488–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sella EJ, Lawson JP, Ogden JA (1986) The accessory synchondrosis. Clin Orthop 209:280–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung JW, Chu IT (2009) Outcome of fusion of a painful accessory navicular to the primary navicular. Foot Ankle Int 30:106–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Macnicol MF, Voutsinas S (1984) Surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:218–226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gluck GS, Heckman DS, Parekh SG (2010) Tendon disorders of the foot and ankle, part 3. The posterior tibial tendon. Am J Sports Med 38:2133–2144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kidner FC (1929) The pre-hallux (accessory scaphoid) in its relation to flatfoot. J Bone Joint Surg 11:831–837

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clark GC (1988) A modified Kidner procedure for symptomatic flat feet. Clin Orthop 228:258–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson DM, Julsrud ME, Erdmann BB, Jacobs PM, Ringstrom JB (1988) Modified KIdner procedure utilizing a Mitek bone Anchor. J Foot Ankle Surg 37:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakayama S, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kasanami R (2005) Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:531–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shurnas PS, Sanders A (2007) A novel approach to the symptomatic accessory navicular. Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery 6:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott AT, Sabesan VJ, Saluta JR, Wilson MA, Easley ME (2009) Fusion versus excision of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int 30:10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takao M, Oae K, Uchio Y, Ochi M, Yamamoto H (2005) Anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ligaments of the ankle with a gracilis autograft. A new technique using an interference fit anchoring system. Am J Sports Med 33:814–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wataru Miyamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miyamoto, W., Takao, M., Yamada, K. et al. Reconstructive surgery using interference screw fixation for painful accessory navicular in adult athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 1423–1427 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1574-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1574-8

Keywords

Navigation