Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

Controversies exist over which type of graft is best for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of ACL reconstruction using either hamstring (HT) autografts or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing HT autografts with BPTB autografts for ACL reconstruction. Data analyses were performed using Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.0.

Results

Nine RCTs (738 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The combined results of the meta-analysis indicated there was a significantly lower rate of negative Pivot test [relative risk (RR) 0.87, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 0.79–0.96, P = 0.004], anterior knee pain (RR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.45–0.96, P = 0.03) and of kneeling pain (RR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.27–0.91, P = 0.02) in the HT group than in the BPTB group.

Conclusions

ACL reconstruction with HT autografts or BPTB autografts achieved similar postoperative effects in terms of restoring knee joint function. HT autografts were inferior to BPTB autografts for restoring knee joint stability, but were associated with fewer postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C (2000) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 28:124–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto A, Yoshiya S, Muratsu H et al (2006) A comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and bone-hamstring tendon-bone autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gorschewsky O, Klakow A, Riechert K, Pitzl M, Becker R (2005) Clinical comparison of the tutoplast allograft and autologous patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone) for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: 2- and 6-year results. Am J Sports Med 33:1202–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett G, Stokes D, White M (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years: allograft versus autograft patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 33:1505–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prodromos C, Joyce B, Shi K (2007) A meta-analysis of stability of antografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 15:851–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harilainen A, Sandelin J (2009) A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices-rigidfix, bioScrew, and intrafix-randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:699–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS (2006) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. BMJ 332:995–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kartus J, Magnusson L, Stener S, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1999) Complications following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-5-year follow-up of 604 patients with special emphasis on anterior knee pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:2–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shelbourne KD, Trumper RV (1997) Preventing anterior knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 25:41–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31:2–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE Jr (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring. Am J Sports Med 32:1986–1995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz P, Nizard R (2007) ACL reconstruction a meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:180–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, Richmond JC (2005) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 21:791–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J et al (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37:2470–2478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenza M, Belloti JC, Gomes Dos Santos JB, Matsumoto MH, Faloppa F (2009) Surgical interventions for treating acute fractures or non-union of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD007428

  16. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J (2008) Chapter 6: searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 (updated February 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org

  17. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008) Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 (updated February 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from http://www.cochrane-handbook.org

  18. Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB Jr (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med 29:272–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC et al (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts—a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1503–1513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Sernert N, Kohler K, Karlsson J (2003) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 31:19–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lidén M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J (2007) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-Year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35:740–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:86–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Feller JA, Webster KE (2003) A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:564–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ (2007) A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med 35:384–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor DC, DeBerardino TM, Nelson BJ, Duffey M, Tenuta J, Stoneman PD, Sturdivant RX, Mountcastle S (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods. Am J Sports Med 37:1946–1957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Drogset JO, Strand T, Uppheim G, Odegård B, Bøe A, Grøntvedt T (2010) Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1085–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann CM, Springer J, Siebold R, Paessler HH (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:653–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hefti F, Mueller W, Jacob RP et al (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FF (1998) Use of the international knee documentation committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:107–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Poolman RW, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M (2007) Hamstring tendon autograft better than bone patellar-tendon bone autograft in ACL reconstruction: a cumulative meta-analysis and clinically relevant sensitivity analysis applied to a previously published analysis. Acta Orthop 78:350–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83:713–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jing L, Jialiang W (2001) The methods and evaluation principles of systematic review. Natl Med J China 81:53–55

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moher D, Cook D, Eastwood S et al (1999) Improving the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials: the QUORUM statement. Lancet 354(9193):1896–1900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Verhagen AP, de Vet HCW, de Bie RA et al (2001) The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 54:651–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nagano M, Yoshiya S, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M, Mizuno K (1997) Remodeling and healing process of bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in a bone tunnel: a histological study in dogs. Trans Orthop Res Soc 22:78

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC (1999) Hamstrings tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:549–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Hidaka C, Warren RF (1993) Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1795–1803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Papageorgiou CD, Ma CB, Abramowitch SD, Clineff TD, Woo SL-Y (2001) A multidisciplinary study of the healing of an intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament graft in a goat model. Am J Sports Med 29:620–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Weiler A, Hoffman RFG, Bail HJ, Rehm O, Sudkamp NP (2002) Tendon healing in a bone tunnel: part II: histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy 18:124–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Victor J, Bellemans J, Witvrouw E et al (1997) Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—prospective analysis of patellar tendon autografts compared with allografts. Int Orthop 21:93–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C (2000) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med 28:124–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Sernert N et al (2000) Comparison of traditional and subcutaneous patellar tendon harvest. A prospective study of donor site-related problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using different graft harvesting techniques. Am J Sports Med 28:328–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Ruikang Hospital of Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical College, Nanning, 530011, China

    Shuzhen Li, Yueping Chen, Zonghan Lin & Wei Cui

  2. Department of Orthopaedics Trauma and Hand Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530027, China

    Jingmin Zhao & Wei Su

Authors
  1. Shuzhen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yueping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zonghan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jingmin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Su.

Additional information

Shuzhen Li and Wei Su contributed equally to the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., Chen, Y., Lin, Z. et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 1287–1297 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1532-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1532-5

Keywords

search

Navigation