Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Suture fixation versus cable cerclage of the tuberosities in shoulder arthroplasty-clinical and radiologic results

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The most important individual parameter linked to functional outcome following hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus is anatomical healing of the tuberosities. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the fixation method influences tuberosity healing and functional outcome.

Methods

Twenty-five consecutive patients with acute 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus were treated with hemiarthroplasty and cable fixation of the tuberosities. Twenty-nine previous patients with four-part fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty and suture fixation of the tuberosities were included as a control group. Functional evaluation was measured with the Constant Score 1 year after the operation. Radiographic evaluation included evaluation of the extent of tuberosity healing and head centralisation.

Results

The average Constant Score was 53.2 points in the suture group and 60.9 in the cable group (p = 0.29). An x-ray evaluation revealed that 40% of the tuberosities in the suture group were anatomically healed versus 75% (p = 0.027) in the cable group. In the suture group, 44% of the prostheses showed marked superior migration, whereas 25% of the prostheses in the cable group showed such migration (p = 0.027).

Conclusion

In our collective adding an encircling steel cable for the fixation of the tuberosities resulted in higher anatomical healing rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1090–1103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, Farrell E, Menth-Chiari W, Lajtai G, Hubner C, Resch H (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(2):217–219. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA (2003) Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12(6):569–577. doi:10.1016/S1058274603002131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(7):1215–1223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):401–412. doi:10.1067/mse.2002.124527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loew M, Heitkemper S, Parsch D, Schneider S, Rickert M (2006) Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(3):345–350. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.16909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frankle MA, Ondrovic LE, Markee BA, Harris ML, Lee WE 3rd (2002) Stability of tuberosity reattachment in proximal humeral hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):413–420. doi:10.1067/mse.2002.126098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krause FG, Huebschle L, Hertel R (2007) Reattachment of the tuberosities with cable wires and bone graft in hemiarthroplasties done for proximal humeral fractures with cable wire and bone graft: 58 patients with a 22-month minimum follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 21(10):682–686. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815917e0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(6):1077–1089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greiner SH, Diederichs G, Kroning I, Scheibel M, Perka C (2009) Tuberosity position correlates with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(3):431–436. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Konrad GG, Mehlhorn A, Kuhle J, Strohm PC, Sudkamp NP (2008) Proximal humerus fractures—current treatment options. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 75(6):413–421

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boileau P, Caligaris-Cordero B, Payeur F, Tinsi L, Argenson C (1999) Prognostic factors during rehabilitation after shoulder prostheses for fracture. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 85(2):106–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Demirhan M, Akpinar S, Atalar AC, Akman S, Akalin Y (1998) Primary replacement of the humeral head in iatrogenically displaced fracture-dislocations of the shoulder: a report about six cases. Injury 29(7):525–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frankle MA, Greenwald DP, Markee BA, Ondrovic LE, Lee WE 3rd (2001) Biomechanical effects of malposition of tuberosity fragments on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(4):321–326. doi:10.1067/mse.2001.113962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fialka C, Stampfl P, Arbes S, Reuter P, Oberleitner G, Vecsei V (2008) Primary hemiarthroplasty in four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: randomized trial of two different implant systems. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(2):210–215. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(4):516–520. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ (2006) Grammont reversed prosthesis for acute complex fracture of the proximal humerus in an elderly population with 5 to 12 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92(6):543–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wall B, Walch G (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Hand Clin 23 (4):425-430, v-vi. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2007.08.002

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nijs S, Lerut P, Broos P The non-reconstructable proximal humerus fracture: reversed or anatomical arthroplasty? In: Supplement: 7th European Trauma Congress, Ljubljana, 2006. p 222

  20. Hettrich CM, Boraiah S, Dyke JP, Neviaser A, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2010) Quantitative assessment of the vascularity of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(4):943–948. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Musculoskeletal Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeck-Str. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany

    Sven-Oliver Dietz

  2. Department of Traumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Paul Broos & Stefaan Nijs

Authors
  1. Sven-Oliver Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Broos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefaan Nijs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven-Oliver Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, SO., Broos, P. & Nijs, S. Suture fixation versus cable cerclage of the tuberosities in shoulder arthroplasty-clinical and radiologic results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 793–800 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1470-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1470-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation